Output Indices in 2D versus 3D/4D Ultrasonography in Fetal Craniocerebral Anomalies | ||||
Minia Journal of Medical Research | ||||
Article 5, Volume 30, Issue 4, October 2019, Page 20-22 PDF (420.17 K) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/mjmr.2022.221604 | ||||
![]() | ||||
Authors | ||||
Mustafa. A. A Osman1; Mohamed S. A. Shehata2; Khaled M. S. Abd-Elaziz3; Mohamed H. Rashad4 | ||||
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, El-Hussein University Hospital, Al-Azhar University | ||||
2Department of Radiology, El-Hussein University Hospital, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt | ||||
3Department of Pediatrics, El-Hussein University Hospital, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt | ||||
4Department of Neurology, El-Hussein University Hospital, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Objective: to compare the acoustic output of conventional two-dimensional US and 3D/4D US in a group of pregnant women with fetal craniofacial malformations. Method: Fifty women with suspected craniocerebral anomalies during routine prenatal ultrasound examination are included in the study. For ultrasound assessment, we used a Doppler ultrasound system. Subsequently, 3D/4D images were obtained using a suitable probe. During both examinations, changes in thermal index (TI) and mechanical index (MI) were recorded. Results: Comparison between TI and MI of the different ultrasound techniques revealed no statistically significant differences. The reported TI for the studied modalities was 0.277 ± 0.01, 0.271 ± 0.008 and 0.249 ± 0.01 (p=0.43) while MI was 1.12 ± 0.012, 0.87 ± 0.014 and 1.19 ± 0.37 (p=11) for B mode, 3D and 4D techniques respectively. Conclusion: 3D/4D ultrasound imaging is comparable to 2D imaging regarding thermal and mechanical indexes in women with fetal craniocerebral anomalies. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Craniocerebral anomalies; 3D/4D ultrasound; thermal index; mechanical index | ||||
Supplementary Files
|
||||
Statistics Article View: 89 PDF Download: 431 |
||||