Arteriovenous Grafts Thrombectomy Salvage Procedures | ||||
Minia Journal of Medical Research | ||||
Article 12, Volume 30, Issue 4, October 2019, Page 72-77 PDF (255.58 K) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/mjmr.2022.221618 | ||||
![]() | ||||
Authors | ||||
Abdelmaksoud A. Elganady1; Ahmed El-Marakbi2; Ayman Ibrahim3 | ||||
1Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. | ||||
2Department of Vascular Surgeon, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt | ||||
3Department of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Objective: Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the access of choice for hemodialysis. The thrombosis of a definitive access for hemodialysis is an acute event that can interrupt dialysis treatment. The management of AVF thrombosis is usually the implantation of a catheter until the creation of a new access; causing depleting the patient’s vascular bed. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of open and Angio-jet mechanical thromboectomy for salvage of failed or failing synthetic arteriovenous grafts (AVGs). Materials and Methods: 90 thromboectomy procedures were done for AVGs from January 2008 to January 2012. Surgical thromboectomy was done for 60 cases and the other 30 were treated by endovascular mechanical thromboectomy using Angio-jet machine. We classified our studied patients into two groups; Group A (underwent surgical thromboectomy) and Group B (underwent endovascular thromboectomy). Results: 73 of the treated arteriovenous grafts (AVG) were completely thrombosed (failed accesses). Complementary angioplasty carried on for 66 cases (73.3%). 30 of these 66-angioplasty group required stenting of the underlying stenosis. Primary technique success was 95% (57/60) and 90.0% (27/30) for surgical and endovascular techniques respectively. Primary patency rate follows up for one year showed no significant difference for both groups. No significant difference in the complications rates between both techniques. The rate of restenosis and reintervention of the grafts and venous conduits is same in both stented and non-stent groups. Conclusion: No superiority of surgical technique over the endovascular one in terms of the primary technical success and for the mid-term patency rate. The endovascular technique could be preferred as the incidence of hematoma development was less and no incision was needed. Primary stenting of underlying venous stenosis is not recommended except in failure achievement of good venous outflow after angioplasty or at recurrent stenosis after the primary intervention. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
ArterioVenous Grafts; Thromboectomy; Endovascular Techniques; Angioplasty | ||||
Supplementary Files
|
||||
Statistics Article View: 177 PDF Download: 1,768 |
||||