Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided caudal epidural steroid injection in the treatment of refractory back pain with radiculopathy: An ultrasound study | ||||
| Minia Journal of Medical Research | ||||
| Volume 30, Issue 1, March 2019, Page 135-139 PDF (187.51 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjmr.2022.222871 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| A. Sherif1; M. I. Abdelkareem2; W. M. Ali2; A . S. Abbas2 | ||||
| 1Department of Rheumatology, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine at Assiut, Al Azhar University, Egyp | ||||
| 2Department of Rheumatology, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine at Assiut, Al Azhar University, Egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Objective: The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection (CESI) compared with fluoroscopy (FL)-guided CESI in patients with refractory back pain associated with radiculopathy. Methods This study was carried out on 50 persons selected from those attending the outpatient clinics of internal medicine department of Al-azhar university hospital, Assuit. From April 2018 to July 2018. The persons were divided into two groups: Group (A): included 25 patients who received US-guided CESI. They were 13 females and 12 males. Their age ranged from 30 to 60 years. Group (B): included 25 patients who received FL-guided CESI. They were 16 females and 9 males. Their age ranged from 27 to 57 years. Results: About 40% of patients were females & 60% of the patients were males. About 42.5% of patients had disease duration of 3-5 years, 37.5% of patients had disease duration of 5-10 years, 10% of patients had disease duration of 10-20 years, 5% of patients had disease duration of >20 years. About 15% of patients had BMI (18.5-24.9), 57.5% of patients had BMI (25-29.9), 27.5% of patients had BMI (>30). In this study There: There is a statistically significant difference between age and Ultrasound findings p. value <0.05. There is no significant difference between gender and Ultrasound findings. There is a statistically significant difference between disease duration and Ultrasound findings p. value<0.05. Conclusion: Caudal epidural injections are considered as the safest and easiest procedures of epidurals with minimal risk of coincidental dural puncture.US is excellent in guiding caudal epidural injection with similar treatment outcome as compared with FL-guided caudal epidural injection and ultrasound should be the preferred alternative when FL is not available. Caudal epidural steroid injection offer alternative effective approach in management of LDP of duration < 5 years, target level not L2-3/L3-4, -ve FST, LDP other than foraminal type and age <40 years and sufficient diameter of SH. Ultrasound is easy to perform with less complications and superior to FL in saving the procedure time owing to easy detection of the SH. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| lumber disc prolapse; Musculoskeletal ultrasonography; caudal epidural steroid injection; fluoroscopy; visual analogue scale; straight leg raising test; sacral hiatus; femoral stretch test; and body mass index | ||||
|
Supplementary Files
|
||||
|
Statistics Article View: 63 PDF Download: 360 |
||||
