EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES FOR DEBONDING OF CERAMIC BRACKETS (AN IN VITRO STUDY) | ||||
| Egyptian Orthodontic Journal | ||||
| Article 4, Volume 61, Issue 6, June 2022, Page 37-45 PDF (383.26 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/eos.2021.105244.1033 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Ahmed S. Khalil  1; Nazla Tamish2; Ahmed Elkalza3
| ||||
| 1Resident, Deparment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt | ||||
| 2Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt. | ||||
| 3Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics Faculty of Dentistry Alexandria University Egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Abstract Objective: To compare different techniques for debonding of ceramic brackets in terms of adhesive remnant index (ARI). Material and methods: A sample of 100 extracted human premolars were randomly and equally allocated into 5 groups of 20. Thereafter, monocrystalline ceramic brackets were bonded to teeth using light cure composite resin. Among the 5 groups; group I: served as control, group II: chemical assisted debonding using peppermint oil, group III: ultrasonic assisted debonding, group IV: diode laser assisted debonding, and group V: Er: YAG laser assisted debonding. Brackets were then debonded using a universal testing machine, followed by ARI assessment. Results: A statistically significant higher ARI scores was found solely in Er:YAG laser assisted debonding. Yet, no significant difference was found with chemical, ultrasonic, and diode laser assisted debonding. Conclusion: Er:YAG laser could be effective for debonding of ceramic brackets. Hence, this method might be recommended to alleviate enamel damage. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Keywords: Ceramic brackets; Er:YAG; Diode; Ultrasonic; Chemical | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 229 PDF Download: 300 |
||||
