SURGICAL GLOVE BAG VERSUS NO GLOVE BAG FOR RETRIEVAL OF THE GALLBLADDER FOLLOWING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: A RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE STUDY
Bessa, S., Sharaan, M., Abdelaziz, M., Saad elnemr, M. (2022). SURGICAL GLOVE BAG VERSUS NO GLOVE BAG FOR RETRIEVAL OF THE GALLBLADDER FOLLOWING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: A RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE STUDY. EKB Journal Management System, 4(1), 48-49. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2022.123761.1373
Samer Saad Bessa; Mohamed Abdalla Sharaan; Mohamed Rabie Abdelaziz; Mohammed Maamon Saad elnemr. "SURGICAL GLOVE BAG VERSUS NO GLOVE BAG FOR RETRIEVAL OF THE GALLBLADDER FOLLOWING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: A RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE STUDY". EKB Journal Management System, 4, 1, 2022, 48-49. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2022.123761.1373
Bessa, S., Sharaan, M., Abdelaziz, M., Saad elnemr, M. (2022). 'SURGICAL GLOVE BAG VERSUS NO GLOVE BAG FOR RETRIEVAL OF THE GALLBLADDER FOLLOWING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: A RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE STUDY', EKB Journal Management System, 4(1), pp. 48-49. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2022.123761.1373
Bessa, S., Sharaan, M., Abdelaziz, M., Saad elnemr, M. SURGICAL GLOVE BAG VERSUS NO GLOVE BAG FOR RETRIEVAL OF THE GALLBLADDER FOLLOWING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: A RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE STUDY. EKB Journal Management System, 2022; 4(1): 48-49. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2022.123761.1373

SURGICAL GLOVE BAG VERSUS NO GLOVE BAG FOR RETRIEVAL OF THE GALLBLADDER FOLLOWING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: A RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE STUDY

ALEXMED ePosters
Article 1, Volume 4, Issue 1, March 2022, Page 48-49  XML
Document Type: Preliminary preprint short reports of original research
DOI: 10.21608/alexpo.2022.123761.1373
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Samer Saad Bessa1; Mohamed Abdalla Sharaan1; Mohamed Rabie Abdelaziz2; Mohammed Maamon Saad elnemr email 2
1Hepatobiliarypancreatic unit, Surgery department, Faculty of medicine, Alexandria university
2Department of Surgery Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University
Abstract
INTRODUCTION:
Gallstone disease constitutes a worldwide major health problem as it is responsible for 1.4 million visits and 750,000 cholecystectomies per year in the United States. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the “Gold standard” for treatment of symptomatic gallstone diseaseand is one of the most common abdominal laparoscopic procedures worldwide.Intraoperative perforation of the gallbladder is among the common complications to be taken into consideration as bile or stone spillage could give rise to early or late postoperative complications. It has been reported to occur with a range of 10% - 36% in different studies. To avoid sequalae of GB perforation especially surgical site infection (SSI), several methods and devices have been used for gallbladder retrieval from the abdominal cavity following LC. No one method has been shown to be superior to another.

AIM OF THE WORK:
The aim of this randomized comparative study is to compare the surgical site infections and / or complications with and without the use of a powder-free surgical glove bag for gallbladder retrieval following iatrogenic gallbladder perforation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated gallstone disease.
Keywords
GLOVE BAG; RETRIEVAL; GB perforation
Supplementary Files
Statistics
Article View: 194