A Cognitive Linguistic Analysis of Force Dynamics in Trump's Speeches | ||||
مجلة الدراسات الإنسانية والأدبية | ||||
Article 9, Volume 25, Issue 3, June 2021, Page 328-358 | ||||
Document Type: المقالة الأصلية | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/shak.2021.226210 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Author | ||||
د.عبدالله عاطف | ||||
Abstract | ||||
The focal point of paper attempts to investigate the impact of Force dynamics in Trump's speeches from a cognitive linguistic perspective. The researcher, from a cognitive linguistic perspective, relies upon Talmy's Theory of force dynamics in Trump's Speeches. Such theory is based upon two major facets: steady Steady-State Force-Dynamics and Shifting Force-Dynamics where there is conflict between agonist and antagonist to prevail and to be salient and stronger and to carry out his/her agenda. The researcher concludes that Trump has cognitively managed to prove that he is a powerful president that is characterized with determination, willingness, force, insistence, persistence. Thus, he is a highly qualified president in the Americans' eyes. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Cognitive linguistics; cognitive semantics; force dynamics; Steady-State Force-Dynamics and Shifting Force-Dynamics | ||||
Supplementary Files
|
||||
References | ||||
References Almanna, A. & Al-Shehari, K. (2019). The Arabic-
English Translator as Photographer. A Linguistic Account.
Routledge
Croft, W. & Cruse, A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge
University Press.
Hart, C. (2011). Force-interactive patterns in immigration
discourse: A Cognitive Linguistic approach to CDA.
Discourse & Society 22 (3), 269-286.
Hasan, H. (2019). Image Schemata and Force Dynamic Analysis
of Conflict in Anthony Burgess' Nineteen Eighty-Five: A
Rhetorical Cognitive Approach
Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of
Meaning, Imagination, and Reading. University of
Chicago Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. (1999). Grammar and
Conceptualization. Berlin & New York: Mouton de
Gruyter.
Langacker, Ronald W. (2007). Cognitive Grammar. In
Geeraerts, D. & Cuyckens, H.(2007) (edited)’s The
Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford
University Press.
Oakley, T. (2019). Force Dynamic Dimensions of Rhetorical
Effect.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333033790
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics:
metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Talmy, L. (2000a). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Vol. 1
Concept Structuring Systems. Massachusetts:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Talmy, L. (2000b). Toward A Cognitive Semantics. Vol. 11:
Typologyand Process in Concept Structuring.
Takahashi, H. (2012). A Cognitive Linguistic Analysis of the
English Imperative With special reference to Japanese
imperatives. John Benjamins Publishing Company
Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
| ||||
Statistics Article View: 216 |
||||