The antimicrobial effect of eugenol on lactobacilli isolated from children’s saliva compared to chlorhexidine (in-vitro study) | ||||
Egyptian Dental Journal | ||||
Article 2, Volume 68, Issue 2 - Serial Number 1, April 2022, Page 1141-1148 PDF (592.65 K) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2022.110223.1900 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
Rehab Samir Salma 1; Moustafa A Matar 1; Sherif S Darwish 1; Nader A. Elseoudy2; Moustafa A. Kandil2; Mohab H. Mehelba2; Walid A Lotfy 3 | ||||
1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Pharos University in Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt. | ||||
2Senior Student, Faculty of Dentistry, Pharos University in Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt. | ||||
3Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Pharos University in Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Background: Eugenol is a frequent component of dental biomaterials and is known to exhibit a range of antimicrobial activity. However, there is a lack of reports on evaluating the antimicrobial activity of eugenol versus chlorhexidine on oral lactobacilli. Material and methods: In the current study, we evaluated the in vitro antimicrobial activity of eugenol by agar diffusion method on 15 Lactobacillus isolates initially isolated from pre-school children and compared the efficacy of eugenol with chlorhexidine. Results: the study showed inhibition zones of eugenol ranged from 6 to 10 mm, while those of chlorhexidine ranged from 7 to 11mm. The statistical analysis using paired t-test revealed a significant difference (P < 0.001) for eugenol and chlorhexidine groups with respect to their antimicrobial efficacy against oral lactobacilli. The minimum inhibitory concentration of eugenol and chlorhexidine were 100-400 and 20-40 micro gm/ml, respectively. Conclusion: The effectiveness of eugenol against lactobacilli was promising in inhibiting caries | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Antimicrobial; Chlorhexidine; Early childhood caries; Eugenol; Lactobacilli | ||||
Statistics Article View: 249 PDF Download: 214 |
||||