Antibacterial Effectiveness of Ginger Extract and Chlorhexidine as Root Canal Irrigants in Primary Teeth Contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis:An in Vitro Study | ||||
| Egyptian Dental Journal | ||||
| Article 21, Volume 68, Issue 2 - Serial Number 1, April 2022, Page 1307-1315 PDF (304.26 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/edj.2022.107784.1882 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
yassmin nooman   1; Mariem Wassel 2; Reham Elghazawy 3; soha El-Hady4
| ||||
| 1Master Degree student, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University | ||||
| 2Associate Professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University | ||||
| 3Lecturer, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University | ||||
| 4Professor, Department of Microbiology and Immunology , Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Objective: Irrigation of root canals with antibacterial solutions is a mandatory step to reduce / eliminate micro-organisms or their byproducts from the root canal system. Considering potential side effects and safety concerns of synthetic drugs, herbal alternatives may prove to be advantageous for endodontic usage. Aim: To compare the antimicrobial effect of 20% ginger ethanolic extract versus 2% chlorhexidine solution as root canal irrigants in primary teeth roots contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis (E.faecalis). Materials and methods: A total of 75 palatal roots of extracted primary molars were randomly divided into five groups (n=15/group): Group I (negative control group): roots were neither contaminated nor irrigated, Group II (positive control): roots were contaminated with E.faecalis and irrigated with sterile saline, Group III: irrigation with 20 % roots were infected with E. faecalis for 21 days. Thereafter, root canals were irrigated for five minutes with the assigned irrigant. Samples were taken from each canal and transferred to Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) culture medium. Bacterial counts were expressed as colony forming units/ml (CFU/ml). Results: CHX showed the highest antibacterial activity, followed by 95% ethanol and 20% ginger ethanolic extract solution. While statistically there was no significant difference between ginger ethanolic extract solution and 95% ethanol. Conclusion: 20% ginger ethanolic extract solution did not show a significant antibacterial effect on E.faecalis when compared to 95% ethanol or 2% CHX. ginger ethanolic extract solution, Group IV: irrigation with2% chlorhexidine (CHX) solution, GroupV: irrigation with 95% Ethanol solution. After mechanical preparation of root canals, the | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Ginger; Enterococcus faecalis; Chlorhexidine | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 356 PDF Download: 285 |
||||
