An in Vitro Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored Using Different Restorative Materials and Glass Fiber Posts | ||||
Egyptian Dental Journal | ||||
Article 7, Volume 68, Issue 2 - Serial Number 5, April 2022, Page 1827-1839 PDF (1.08 MB) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2022.112910.1926 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
Ahmed Elkabbany 1; Dina Farahat 2; Rabab Mehesen3; abdelreheem abdelkader 4 | ||||
1Department of Endodontics , Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt. | ||||
2Department of Dental Biomaterials, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University | ||||
3operative dentistry, faculty of dentistry, Mansoura university, Elmansoura city, Egypt | ||||
4Department of Fixed prosthodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Objectives: the aim of this study was to compare fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with fiber reinforced post and different resin composite restorative materials. Materials and Methods: Eighty sound extracted premolar teeth were divided in to 3 groups; A (10 teeth kept sound as +ve control), B (10 teeth prepared only as –ve control), C (60 teeth divided into subgroup a as prepared and restored without post, and subgroup b as prepared and restored with prefabricated fiber-reinforced post (Glassix plus, Harald Nordin SA, Switzerland)). Each subgroup was divided into 3 divisions (n=10); 1 (coronal restoration with Tetric EvoCeram), 2 (coronal restoration with Tetric N-ceram), and 3 (coronal restoration with Tetric N-ceram Bulk-fill). All the teeth in group C were prepared for MOD cavities, root canal cleaned, shaped and obturated. All the teeth were subjected to thermo-mechanical aging and the universal testing machine by applying vertical compressive force at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/ min. All the data were collected to be subjected to quantitative statistical analysis. Results: Group A showed the highest fracture resistance values, and Group B showed the lowest values. Two-way ANOVA showed a significant difference among all groups. Conclusions: Bulk-fill resin composite restorations supported with prefabricated fiber-reinforced post improved fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
fiber-reinforced post; nano-hybrid resin composites; fracture resistance; thermo-mechanical cycling; Bulk-fill resin composite | ||||
Statistics Article View: 259 PDF Download: 238 |
||||