One-year comparative clinical evaluation of ACTIVA Bioactive restorative material with Nano hybrid composite resin in class V cavity preparation
Essa, M., Nassar, A., Attia, R. (2022). One-year comparative clinical evaluation of ACTIVA Bioactive restorative material with Nano hybrid composite resin in class V cavity preparation. EKB Journal Management System, 68(2), 1875-1888. doi: 10.21608/edj.2022.113865.1933
Mona Essa; Ashraf Nassar; Reham Attia. "One-year comparative clinical evaluation of ACTIVA Bioactive restorative material with Nano hybrid composite resin in class V cavity preparation". EKB Journal Management System, 68, 2, 2022, 1875-1888. doi: 10.21608/edj.2022.113865.1933
Essa, M., Nassar, A., Attia, R. (2022). 'One-year comparative clinical evaluation of ACTIVA Bioactive restorative material with Nano hybrid composite resin in class V cavity preparation', EKB Journal Management System, 68(2), pp. 1875-1888. doi: 10.21608/edj.2022.113865.1933
Essa, M., Nassar, A., Attia, R. One-year comparative clinical evaluation of ACTIVA Bioactive restorative material with Nano hybrid composite resin in class V cavity preparation. EKB Journal Management System, 2022; 68(2): 1875-1888. doi: 10.21608/edj.2022.113865.1933

One-year comparative clinical evaluation of ACTIVA Bioactive restorative material with Nano hybrid composite resin in class V cavity preparation

Egyptian Dental Journal
Article 12, Volume 68, Issue 2 - Serial Number 5, April 2022, Page 1875-1888  XML PDF (1.82 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2022.113865.1933
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Mona Essa email orcid 1; Ashraf Nassar2; Reham Attiaorcid 3
1Assistant Professor Opertive Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry,Beni-Suef University
2Assistant Professor Restorative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, Tanta. Egyp
3Associate Professor, Faculty of Dentistry Zagazig Universty
Abstract
Abstract
Aim: to clinically evaluate and compare the difference between nanohybrid composite (such as Tetric EvoCeram (TEC), Ivoclar-Vivadent) with Activa™ bioactive composite in Class V lesions after one year of their application to the affected teeth.
Material and methods: Thirty patients (20 males & 10 females aged 25- 45 years) each one with at least two NCCLs, participated in this study. Total of 60 restorations were done, each patient have a couple of ClassV restorations one restored with Nano hybrid composite ( Tetric EvoCeram (TEC), Ivoclar-Vivadent) and the other with Activa™ bioactive composite, class V being prepared by only one operator. The teeth were divided into two experimental groups as follows: Group 1 (n = 30) – Nano hybrid composite and Group 2 (n = 30) – Activa™ bioactive composite. The restorations were evaluated at 1 week (baseline), 6 months and 12 months after placement. The parameters of evaluation and comparison were deepened on modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria.

Results: There was no statistical significant difference observed in the clinical performance of both Nano hybrid composite and Activa™ bioactive composite at 1 week, 6 months, and 1 year.

Conclusions: Both restorative materials , Nano hybrid composite and Activa™ bioactive composite after one year showed successful clinical performances for restoration of NCCL.
Keywords
Keywords: one year; Activa™ bioactive composite; class V
Statistics
Article View: 312
PDF Download: 504