توسيط الإنصاف المدرک في العلاقة بين التعاملات التفضيلية في مکان العمل وسلوک العمل الابتکاري للموظف "دراسة تطبيقية على موظفي شرکات الأدوية بجمهورية مصر العربية"
النجار, ., إبراهيم عشري, ., الدمرداش ابراهيم السيد العشري, . (2020). توسيط الإنصاف المدرک في العلاقة بين التعاملات التفضيلية في مکان العمل وسلوک العمل الابتکاري للموظف "دراسة تطبيقية على موظفي شرکات الأدوية بجمهورية مصر العربية". EKB Journal Management System, 44(4), 135-185. doi: 10.21608/alat.2020.232802
حميدة النجار; تامر إبراهيم عشري; محمد الدمرداش ابراهيم السيد العشري. "توسيط الإنصاف المدرک في العلاقة بين التعاملات التفضيلية في مکان العمل وسلوک العمل الابتکاري للموظف "دراسة تطبيقية على موظفي شرکات الأدوية بجمهورية مصر العربية"". EKB Journal Management System, 44, 4, 2020, 135-185. doi: 10.21608/alat.2020.232802
النجار, ., إبراهيم عشري, ., الدمرداش ابراهيم السيد العشري, . (2020). 'توسيط الإنصاف المدرک في العلاقة بين التعاملات التفضيلية في مکان العمل وسلوک العمل الابتکاري للموظف "دراسة تطبيقية على موظفي شرکات الأدوية بجمهورية مصر العربية"', EKB Journal Management System, 44(4), pp. 135-185. doi: 10.21608/alat.2020.232802
النجار, ., إبراهيم عشري, ., الدمرداش ابراهيم السيد العشري, . توسيط الإنصاف المدرک في العلاقة بين التعاملات التفضيلية في مکان العمل وسلوک العمل الابتکاري للموظف "دراسة تطبيقية على موظفي شرکات الأدوية بجمهورية مصر العربية". EKB Journal Management System, 2020; 44(4): 135-185. doi: 10.21608/alat.2020.232802

توسيط الإنصاف المدرک في العلاقة بين التعاملات التفضيلية في مکان العمل وسلوک العمل الابتکاري للموظف "دراسة تطبيقية على موظفي شرکات الأدوية بجمهورية مصر العربية"

المجلة المصرية للدراسات التجارية
Article 10, Volume 44, Issue 4, October 2020, Page 135-185  XML PDF (2.1 MB)
Document Type: المقالة الأصلية
DOI: 10.21608/alat.2020.232802
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
حميدة النجار1; تامر إبراهيم عشري2; محمد الدمرداش ابراهيم السيد العشري
1کلية التجارة - جامعة المنصورة
2کلية التجارة - جامعة المنصور
Abstract
Abstract
The main objective of this research was to determine the effect of preferential treatments in the workplace as an independent variable and perceived fairness of employees as a mediating variable on the Employees' innovative work behavior. And based on the data obtained from the questionnaire that was distributed to all staff of the research and development department in the registered pharmaceutical companies that were Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics, where the total number of workers in the R&D department in those companies was (537) workers, so the response rate was (418) valid form as 77.8%. And through the use of the method of Partial Least Squares (PLS). The results of this study confirmed the research hypothesis concerning the mediation of perceived fairness on the relationship between preferential treatments at workplace and employee Innovative work behavior. Also, according to the results, those findings indicate that perceived fairness had a direct effect on Innovative work behavior. Implications for management and future research are discussed.
Keywords: Perceived fairness, Innovative work behavior, Idea generation, Idea connection, Implementation starting activities, Involving others, Innovation outcomes, preferential treatments, favoritism, nepotism
References
  1. Abdalla, F. H. - Maghrabi, S. - Raggad, G. B. (1998), ‘‘Assessing the Effect of Nepotism on Human Resource Managers Toward Nepotism A Cross Cul-tural Study’’, International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 19, No: 8, p. 554-70.
  2. Abdalla, H. F.- Maghrabi, A. S. - Al-Dabbagh, T. H. (1994), “Research Note: Assessing the Effect of Nepotism on Human Resource Managers”, Inter-national Journal of Manpower, Vol. 15, No: 1, p. 60-67.
  3. Ahmed, Fiza; Hassan, Atif; Ayub, Malik Umer; Klimoski, Richard J. (2018) :High commitment work system and innovative work behavior: The mediating role of knowledge sharing, Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS), ISSN 2309-8619, Johar Education Society, Pakistan (JESPK), Lahore, Vol. 12, Iss. 1, pp. 29-51
  4. Amabile, T.M. (1988) A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-167.
  5. Arasli, H., Alpler, N. N., & Doh, W. (2015). The role of employability and nepotism on frontline employees' service sabotage. In International Interdisciplinary Business- Economics Advancement Conference (pp. 246-258). Ft. Lauderdale, FL: University of South Florida.
  6. Arasli, H., & Tumer, M. (2008). Nepotism, favoritism and cronyism: A study of their effects on job stressand job satisfaction in the banking industry of north Cyprus. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 36(9), 1237-1250.
  7. B. Charles Tatum Richard J. Eberlin, (2008),"The relationship between organizational justice and conflict style", Business Strategy Series, Vol. 9 Iss 6 pp. 297 - 305
  8. Bandura, A. (1977) Social learning theory, Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs,.
  9. Bysted, Rune. (2013). Innovative employee behavior: The moderating effects of mental involvement and job satisfaction on contextual variables. European Journal of Innovation Management. 16. 10.1108/EJIM-09-2011-0069.
  10. Briggs, E. (2012). Who’s your daddy? Addressing nepotism from a cultural perspective. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Undergraduate Research (NCUR) 2012 (pp. 268-271). Ogden, UT: Weber State University.
  11. Büte, Mustafa. (2011). The Effects of Nepotism and Favoritism on Employee Behaviors and Human Research Management Practices: A Research on Turkish Public Banks. Amme idaresi dergisi. 44. 135-153.
  12. Chen, C. C., Gaspar, J. P., Friedman, R., Newburry, W., Nippa, M. C., Xin, K., et al. (2015). Paradoxical relationships between cultural norms of particularism and attitudes toward rela- tional favoritism: A cultural reflectivity perspective. Journal of Business Ethics. Advance online publication.
  13. Cropanzano, R., & Greenberg, J. (1997), Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze, C L Cooper & I T. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New York: Wiley & Sons.
  14. De Spiegelaere, Stan and Van Gyes, Guy and De Witte, Hans and Niesen, Wendy and Hootegem, Geert Van, On the Relation of Job Insecurity, Job Autonomy, Innovative Work Behaviour and the Mediating Effect of Work Engagement (September 2014). Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol. 23, Issue 3, pp. 318-330, 2014, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2480708 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/caim.12079
  15. Emel Aközer (2003). National Qualifications Framework for Higher Education in Turkey, and Architectural Education: Problems and Challenges of Implementation. Journal of Higher Education and Science 3(1):27
  16. Ford, R., & McLaughlin, F. (1986). Nepotism: Boon or bane? Personal Administrator, 31, 78-89.
  17. Fu, I. (2015). Favoritism: Ethical dilemmas viewed through multiple paradigms. The Journal of Values-Based Leadership, 8(6), 1-7. Retrieved from http://scholar.valpo.edu/jvbl/
  18. Gráinne M. Fitzsimons,.et al (2008). Automatic Effects of Brand Exposure on Motivated Behavior: How Apple Makes You "Think Different". Journal of Consumer Research 35(1):245.
  19. H Kremer, I Villamor, H Aguinis (2019). Innovation leadership: Bestpractice recommendations for promoting employee creativity, voice, and knowledge sharing - Business Horizons, 2019.
  20. Iweins, Caroline & Desmette, Donatienne & Yzerbyt, Vincent & Stinglhamber, Florence. (2013). Ageism at work: The impact of intergenerational contact and organizational multi-age perspective. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 22. 331-346. 10.1080/1359432X.2012.748656.
  21. Jones, Robert & Stout, Tracy. (2015). Policing Nepotism and Cronyism Without Losing the Value of Social Connection. Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 8. 2-12. 10.1017/iop.2014.3
  22. Judge, T. A., & Colquitt, J. A. (2004), Organizational justice and stress: The mediating role of work family conflict, Journal of Applied Psychology, 89 (3), 395 404.
  23. Kiechel, W. (1984). How to Relate to Nepotism. Fortune, February 1984. 143-144.
  24. Kayabaşı, Yeltekin (2005), Politik Yozlasmaya Çözüm Olarak Anayasal İktisat, Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  25. Lukes, M. and Stephan, U. (2017), "Measuring employee innovation", International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 136-158
  26. Kim, J., Song, E., & Lee, S. (2013). Organizational change and employee organizational identification: Mediation of perceived uncertainty. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 41(6), 1019-1034.
  27. King, N., & Anderson, N. (2002). Managing innovation and change: A critical guide for organizations. London: Thompson.
  28. Liedtka, Jeanne. (2014). Perspective: Linking Design Thinking with Innovation Outcomes through Cognitive Bias Reduction. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 32. 10.1111/jpim.12163.
  29. Loewe, Markus- Blume, Jonas- Schönleber, Verena- Seibert, Stella- Speer, Johanna- Christian, Voss (2007), The Impact of Favouritism on the Business Climate: A Study on Wasta in Jordan, s. 216, Bonn 2007.
  30. Ma-Kellams, C., Spencer-Rodgers, J. and Peng, K. (2011) 'I am against us? Unpacking cultural differences in ingroup favoritism via dialecticism', Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(1), 15-27.
  31. Malik, Samreen. (2016). Impact Of Perceived Discrimination And Resultant Stress On Innovative Work Behavior Moderated By Spirituality Among Female Emoployees In Private Banks Of Rawalpindi. Archives of Business Research. 4. 10.14738/abr.46.2263.
  32. Myhill, Andy & Bradford, Ben. (2013). Overcoming cop culture? Organizational justice and police officers' attitudes toward the public. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management. 36. 10.1108/13639511311329732.
  33. Niehoff, B., Moorman, P., & Robert, H. (1993), Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior, Academy of Management Journal, 36 (3), 527-566.
  34. Ojedokun, Oluyinka. (2012). Role of Perceived Fair Interpersonal Treatment and Organization-Based Self-Esteem in Innovative Work Behavior in a Nigerian Bank. Psychological Thought. 5. 124-140. 10.5964/psyct.v5i2.33.
  35. Oktay, C. (1983), Yükselen Đstemler Karşısında Türk Siyasal Sistemi ve Kamu Bürokrasisi, Đstanbul Üniversitesi SBF Yayını, Đstanbul.
  36. Özler, H., Ergun, D. Ö. ve G. qE. Gümüştekin, (2007), “Aile İşletmelerinde Nepotizmin Gelişim Evreleri ve Kurumsallaşma”, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt. 17, ss.437-450.
  37. Kmieciak, R. (2020), "Trust, knowledge sharing, and innovative work behavior: empirical evidence from Poland", European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print
  38. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Contemporary approaches to assessing mediation in communication research. In A. F. Hayes, M. D. Slater, & L. B. Snyder (Eds.), The Sage sourcebook of advanced data analysis methods for communication research (p. 13–54). Sage Publications, Inc.
  39. Rada, Vinola Isabel (2018) Examining the Relationship Between Perceptions of Organizational Justice, Innovative Work Behavior, and Transformational Leadership after Controlling for Gender. Northcentral University, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2018. 13426671.
  40. Rajpaul-Baptiste, Cindy (2018) Antecedents and Consequences of Nepotism: A Social Psychological Exploration. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) thesis, University of Kent,.
  41. Rivera LA (2012). Hiring as Cultural Matching: The Case of Elite Professional Service Firms. American Sociological Review. 2012;77(6):999-1022.
  42. Runco, M.A. & I. Chand (1994). Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  43. Spranger, J. L., Colarelli, S. M., Dimotakis, N., Jacob, A., & Surinen, R., Kivmaki, M., Elovainio, M., & Virtanen, M. (2002). Organizational fairness and psychological distress in hospital physicians. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 30(3) 209–215.
  44. Sundbo, J. (1999) Empowerment of employees in small and medium-sized service firms, Employee relations, 21, 105-127.
  45. Sven Horak (2016). Same but different? Similarities and fundamental differences of informal social networks in China (guanxi) and Korea (yongo).
  46. Tajfel, H. (1978). The achievement of inter-group differentiation. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 77–100). London: Academic Press.
  47. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of inter-group conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel
  48. West, M.A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51(3), 355-387
  49. Yavuz, Mustafa & Gürhan, Nermin & Geniş, Bahadır. (2020). Nepotism perception and job satisfaction in healthcare workers. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi. 21. 468-476. 10.5455/apd.74234.
  50. Zhao J, et al. (2010) The protein kinase Hal5p is the high-copy suppressor of lithium-sensitive mutations of genes involved in the sporulation and meiosis as well as the ergosterol biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genomics 95(5):290-8
Statistics
Article View: 142
PDF Download: 497