Conformity and Homogeneity Indices for Head and Neck Cancer Patients using 3DCRT
Abotaleb, H., Maarouf, E., El-Hossary, F., Raaif, M., Kelany, M. (2017). Conformity and Homogeneity Indices for Head and Neck Cancer Patients using 3DCRT. EKB Journal Management System, 2(2), 19-25. doi: 10.21608/sjsci.2017.233211
Hanan A. Abotaleb; Ehab Maarouf; F. M. El-Hossary; M. Raaif; Mohamed Kelany. "Conformity and Homogeneity Indices for Head and Neck Cancer Patients using 3DCRT". EKB Journal Management System, 2, 2, 2017, 19-25. doi: 10.21608/sjsci.2017.233211
Abotaleb, H., Maarouf, E., El-Hossary, F., Raaif, M., Kelany, M. (2017). 'Conformity and Homogeneity Indices for Head and Neck Cancer Patients using 3DCRT', EKB Journal Management System, 2(2), pp. 19-25. doi: 10.21608/sjsci.2017.233211
Abotaleb, H., Maarouf, E., El-Hossary, F., Raaif, M., Kelany, M. Conformity and Homogeneity Indices for Head and Neck Cancer Patients using 3DCRT. EKB Journal Management System, 2017; 2(2): 19-25. doi: 10.21608/sjsci.2017.233211

Conformity and Homogeneity Indices for Head and Neck Cancer Patients using 3DCRT

Sohag Journal of Sciences
Volume 2, Issue 2, May 2017, Page 19-25  XML PDF (360.2 K)
Document Type: Regular Articles
DOI: 10.21608/sjsci.2017.233211
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Hanan A. Abotaleb email 1; Ehab Maarouf2; F. M. El-Hossary3; M. Raaif3; Mohamed Kelany4
1Sohag Armed Forced oncology Center, Sohag, Egypt
2Department of Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
3Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt
4Department of Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, El-Demerdash Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Abstract
This study aims to demonstrate the conformity and homogeneity level achieved by 3D conformal radiation therapy for head and neck malignant tumors patients. Conformity and homogeneity indices are good quantitative tools for assessing and comparing the dose conformity and homogeneity of various treatment plans of one patient. In this study fifteen patients with advanced head and neck tumors have been selected. For each patient, five plans were promoted by using four planning techniques which were, Field-in-Field (FIF), Bellinzona, Conpas, Forward-PlannedMultisegments (FPMS) with multiple energies denoted as FPMS (M) and another identical plan of FPMS but with using single energy denoted as FPMS (S). The CIRTOG recorded values of 1.46±0.16, 1.47±0.16, 1.52±0.18, 1.564±0.20, 1.58±0.21 for FPMS (M), FPMS (S), FIF, Conpas, and Bellinzona respectively. The HI recorded values of 0.187± 0.014,0.193±0.011, 0.196±0.031, 0.202±0.017, 0.219±0.02 for FPMS (S), FPMS (M), FIF, Bellinzona, and Conpas respectively. It has been observed from the results that FPMS technique either using multiple energies or single has the highest conformity and homogeneity followed by FIF technique. For conformity, Conpas has the third rank followed by Bellinzona technique. For homogeneity, Bellinzona has the third rank followed by Conpas technique.
Keywords
Head and neck; Conformity index; Homogeneity index; 3DCRT
Statistics
Article View: 75
PDF Download: 140