TESTING AND ASSESSMENT OF SOME EGYPTIAN MARBLE TYPES | ||||
| JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences | ||||
| Article 6, Volume 50, Issue 3, May 2022, Page 38-55 PDF (1.37 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/jesaun.2022.135176.1131 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Hamed M. Gamil  1; Mostafa M. Elbeblawi2; Mahmoud M. Ahmed2; Mostafa T. Mohamed2
| ||||
| 1Mining Advisor and Chairman at Falcon Mining Company, Cairo, Egypt. | ||||
| 2Professors, Mining and Metallurgical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Marble is one of the most important materials in the field of interior design for houses and buildings. Marble is a natural material with aesthetic values that may vary from one type to another depending on its mineral compositions and its properties. In this research, the necessary tests were done for six types of Egyptian marble To compare the differences between geological, chemical, physicomechanical properties of the same marble type in the different areas and to quantify the different characteristics and uses of selected marble types. The tests were physical, mechanical (according to ASTM standards), chemical, as well as petrography analysis. South Sinai Teriesta marble samples had the highest values of major oxides, as SiO2 1.03%, MgO 0.638%, Al2O3 0.355%, Fe2O3 0.339%, and the lowest value of CaO 54.6%, compared with other studied marble types. Zaafarana marble samples had the lowest values of water absorption with average of 0.356% and the apparent porosity with average of 0.894%, the highest average values of: bulk density 2.729 gm/cm3, abrasion resistance 2.345, and compressive strength 100.29 MPa compared with other studied marble types. Elminya Selvia marble samples had the highest values of water absorption with average of 1.488% and the apparent porosity with average of 3.770%., the lowest average values of: bulk density with 2.468 gm/cm3, abrasion resistance 1.145, and compressive strength 41.37 MPa. Modulus of rupture ranged from 7.2 to 13.8 MPa, for dry and wet conditions and the flexural strength ranged from 6.4 to 12.25 MPa, for dry and wet conditions. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Marble; petrographic characteristics; physicomechanical properties | ||||
| References | ||||
|
[1] G.M. Wahab, M. Gouda, and G. Ibrahim, “Study of physical and mechanical properties for some of Eastern Desert dimension marble and granite utilized in building decoration,” Ain Shams Engineering Journal, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 907-915, 2019. [2] M.A. Abdel-Hamid, W.M. Draz, A.F. Ismael, M.A. Gouda, and S.M. Sleem, “Effect of petrographical characteristics on the engineering properties of some Egyptian ornamental stones,” International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 116-123, 2015. [3] M. Elbeblawi, M.A. Sayed, G.Y. Boghdadi, and H.H. Hamd-Allh,. “Using diamond core bit to determine the suitable operating parameters in drilling some marble rocks,” Journal of Engineering Sciences, Assiut University, Faculty of Engineering, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 723-745, March, 2013. [4] M.S. Afia, “Current Mining Development. Egyptian General Authority for Books,” 1998. [5] A.I Kandil and T.H. Selim, “Characteristics of the Marble Industry in Egypt: Structure, Conduct, and Performance,” International Business and Economics Research Journal (IBER), American University in Cairo, Egypt. vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 25-34, February, 2011. [6] A.I. Kandil and T.H. Selim “Characteristics of Marble Industry in Egypt: Structure, Conduct, and Performance,” International Business and Economics Research Journal (IBER), vol. 5, no. 3, March, 2006,. [7] F.A. Haggag, “Economic and Financial Valuation of the Marble Industry in Egypt,” American University in Cairo, Egypt, 2012.
[8] J.E. Tilton and W.A. Coulter, “Depletion and the long-run availability of mineral commodities,” Mining, minerals and sustainable development, vol. 14, pp. III-1, 2001. [9] Internazionale Marmo e Macchine Carrara S.P.A (IMM), “stone sector,” http://issuu.com/thetis/docs/stone_sector_2010?mode=embed&layout=http%3A2F%2Fskin.issuu.com%2Fv%2Flight%2Flayout.xml&showFlipBtn=true. [10] United State Geological Survey (USGS), “Minerals yearbook, advanced release, dimension stone ,” (2000-2017). [11] International Trade Center (ITC), “ https://www.trademap.org. [12] Export Council for Building Materials, Refractory and Metallurgy Industries (ECBM), http://ecbm-eg.org/ar/AllStatistics.aspx.
[13] Mining Industries and Marble Technology Center (MIMTC), Report. [14] https://www.elnuwregypt1.com/2021/02/Marble-and-granite-prices.html. [15] American Standard for Testing Material ASTM - C1721, Standard Guide for Petrographic Examination of Dimension Stone, 2015.
[16] American Standard for Testing Material ASTM - C97, Standard Test Methods for Absorption and Bulk Specific Gravity of Dimension Stone, 2009.
[17] American Standard for Testing Material ASTM - C241, Standard Test Method for Abrasion Resistance of Stone Subjected to Foot Traffic, 2009.
[18] American Standard for Testing Material ASTM - C170, Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Dimension Stone, 1990.
[19] American Standard for Testing Material ASTM - C99, Standard Test Method for Modulus of Rupture of Dimension Stone, 2009.
[20] American Standard for Testing Material ASTM - C880, Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Dimension Stone, 1999.
[21] American Standard for Testing Material ASTM - C503, Standard specification for marble dimension stone, 2015. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 565 PDF Download: 1,120 |
||||
