A Stylistic Approach to Power Relation Shifts in Arthur Miller’s The Crucible

Aziz, A. G., & Qunayeer, H. S. (2014). Social hysteria vs individual dilemma: A pragmatic study of character relationship in Arthur Miller's The Crucible. European Scientific Journal, 238-256. Retrieved from https://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/4874

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1978). Some universals in language usage. (J. Gumperz, Ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085

Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 349 - 367. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3 

Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. New York: Cambridge University press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752

Culpeper, J. (2013). Impoliteness. Handbook of Pragmatics, 1-18.

Culpeper, J., Haugh, M., & Kádár, D. Z. (2017). The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness. (D. Z. Michael Haugh, Ed.) London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7

Eelen, G. (1999). Politeness and ideology: A critical review. International Pragmatics Association, 163-173. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.9.1.09eel

Eelen, G. (2001). A critique of politeness theories. Manchester: St. Jerome. https://doi.org/10.4236/ahs.2015.43016

Harding, S. (1991). Whose Science? Whose knowledge? New York: Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501712951

Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman's place. New York: HARPER & ROW. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500000051

Leavy, P. (2014). The Oxford handbook of qualitative research. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199811755.001.0001  

Mann, M. (1986). The sources of social power: A history of power from the beginning to AD (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511570896

McGill, W. (1981). The Crucible of History: Arthur Miller's John Proctor. The New England Quarterly, 54(2), 258-264. https://doi.org/10.2307/364974

Mesthrie, R. (2011). The Cambridge handbook of Sociolinguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511997068

Miller, A. (2002). The Crucible. Boston, Massachusetts: McDougal Littell, a division of Houghton. https://www.worldcat.org/title/crucible-and-related-readings/oclc/244150244

Mohammed, H. N., & Abbas, N. F. (2015, December). Pragmatics of impoliteness and rudeness. American International Journal of Social Science, 195-205. http://www.aijssnet.com/journals/Vol_4_No_6_December_2015/24.pdf

Mulyanto, M., Setiawan, S., & Kurnia, F. D. (2019). Pragmatic analysis of the dialogues in Arthur Miller’s drama “The Crucible”. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, 61, 55-67. doi:10.7176/JLLL/61-06

Pable, A. (2007). The construction of a period dialect: The language of Arthur Miller's The Crucible and its sources. Trier: WVT, Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.

Thorpe, C., Yuill, C., Hobbs, M., Todd, M., Tomely, S., & Weeks, M. (2015). The sociology book: big ideas simply explained. New York: Dorling Kindersley LTD. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947010387024

Wardhaugh, R., & Fuller, J. (2015). An introduction to sociolinguistics (7 ed.). Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://www.worldcat.org/title/introduction-to-sociolinguistics/oclc/885027160

Wilson, A. L., & Cervero, R. M. (2001). Power in practice: Adult education and the struggle for knowledge and power in society. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass Inc. https://doi.org/10.21225/D5X60J