Comparative Histological Assessment of Osseodensification Implant Site Preparation Versus Conventional Drilling Technique
William, M., Sleem, H., AbdelMohsen, K., Mohamed, F., Baraka, N. (2022). Comparative Histological Assessment of Osseodensification Implant Site Preparation Versus Conventional Drilling Technique. EKB Journal Management System, 13(1), 26-34. doi: 10.21608/omx.2022.132935.1159
Mina William; Heba Sleem; Karim AbdelMohsen; Faisal Mohamed; Nuha Baraka. "Comparative Histological Assessment of Osseodensification Implant Site Preparation Versus Conventional Drilling Technique". EKB Journal Management System, 13, 1, 2022, 26-34. doi: 10.21608/omx.2022.132935.1159
William, M., Sleem, H., AbdelMohsen, K., Mohamed, F., Baraka, N. (2022). 'Comparative Histological Assessment of Osseodensification Implant Site Preparation Versus Conventional Drilling Technique', EKB Journal Management System, 13(1), pp. 26-34. doi: 10.21608/omx.2022.132935.1159
William, M., Sleem, H., AbdelMohsen, K., Mohamed, F., Baraka, N. Comparative Histological Assessment of Osseodensification Implant Site Preparation Versus Conventional Drilling Technique. EKB Journal Management System, 2022; 13(1): 26-34. doi: 10.21608/omx.2022.132935.1159

Comparative Histological Assessment of Osseodensification Implant Site Preparation Versus Conventional Drilling Technique

Egyptian Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 13, Issue 1, January 2022, Page 26-34  XML PDF (829.76 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/omx.2022.132935.1159
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Mina William1; Heba Sleem email 2; Karim AbdelMohsen3; Faisal Mohamed4; Nuha Baraka1
1MSc - Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University
2Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry - Ain Shams University
3Associate Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry - Ain Shams University
4Professor of Surgery, Anaesthesiology and Radiology, Faculty of Veterinary - Medicine -Cairo University
Abstract
Purpose: is to analyze histologically in a dog model how osseodensification (OD) implant site preparation method influence the
bone area fraction (BAF), the bone implant contact (BIC) and bone mineral density (BMD) around dental implants compared
to the conventional drilling method.
Materials and Methods: this experimental study was conducted on four dogs using split mouth fashion so that each side
received two implants with two different implant-site preparation technique. In the study group, Densah Burs were used to
osseodensify the osteotomy site where conventional cutting drills were used in the control group. Light Microscope (LM)
examination of HE-stained sections was used to evaluate BAF, while Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) was used to
evaluate BIC and BMD.
Results:osseointegration was almost similar in the control and experimental groups examined by both LM and SEM. There was
no statistically significant difference between both groups in BAF, BIC and BMD.
Conclusion: it can be concluded that OD technique using Densah Bur didn’t show any significant difference in the BAF, BIC
or BMD than the conventional drilling methods in the experimental duration used.
Keywords
Dental Implant; Osseodensification; BIC; Densah Bur
Statistics
Article View: 124
PDF Download: 344