Phenotypic tests and Molecular detection of blaOXA-48 and blaNDM-1 genes among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolated from allograft liver recipients | ||||
Egyptian Journal of Medical Microbiology | ||||
Volume 29, Issue 3, July 2020, Page 29-36 PDF (521.06 K) | ||||
Document Type: New and original researches in the field of Microbiology. | ||||
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51429/EJMM29304 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
Samah M. Awad* 1; Enas M. Ghoneim1; Azza M. Abd El Aziz1; Yasmin A. El Shaaraway1; Mohammad Taha2 | ||||
1Department of Clinical Microbiology and Immunology, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Egypt | ||||
2Depatment of Hepatopancreatobiliary surgery, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Egypt | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Background: Infections with carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) cause significant morbidity and mortality in Liver transplant recipients. Accurate detection of CRE is the first step in combating this problem. Objectives: to study the distribution of pathogens and CRE causing infections in liver allograft recipients with special reference to the impact of pre-operative intestinal colonization with CRE on post-operative infections, and to investigate the phenotypic tests and to detect the frequency of blaOXA-48 and blaNDM-1 genes by duplex PCR. Methodology: A total of 23 CRE isolates were investigated for carbapenemase production by phenotypic methods such as the modified Hodge test (MHT), douple disc synergy test (DDST), E test and Rabidec Carba NP (RCNP) test. Production of blaOXA 48 and blaNDM-1genes was investigated by duplex PCR. Results: Frequency of CRE that harbored blaOXA-48 and blaNDM-1 genes, as obtained by PCR, was 47.8% for blaOXA-48, 20.1% for blaNDM-1 and 8.7% of CRE isolates co-produced the two genes. RCNP test exhibited Sensitivity of 90.9% and 100% versus 81.1% and 66.6% sensitivities by MHT in detecting blaOXA-48 and blaNDM-1genes respectively. E-test had a much higher sensitivity in identifying NDM-1 carpabenemase compared to DDST (100% versus 66.6% respectively).Conclusion: RCNP test can be done instead of MHT in detecting CRE, as it is more accurate, rapid and having excellent sensitivity in detecting blaNDM-1 and blaOXA-48 producing isolates. E-test is more reliable than DDST and can be a valid alternative to PCR in detecting MBL especially NDM-1 type. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
CRE; Enterobacteraece; allograft liver recipient | ||||
Statistics Article View: 56 PDF Download: 88 |
||||