Pregnancy Rate in Women with Normal Uterine Cavity and those with Corrected Uterine Cavitary Lesions in ICSI Cycles | ||||
Evidence Based Women's Health Journal | ||||
Article 5, Volume 12, Issue 3, August 2022, Page 270-277 PDF (362.35 K) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/ebwhj.2022.139884.1176 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
Ibrahim I. Mohamed1; Ahmed A. Sobh 1; Ahmed Kamel2; Sayed A. Mostafa2; Dina Habib2; Ahmed Yousef2 | ||||
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Egypt | ||||
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Aim: To investigate the pregnancy rate in women with normal uterine cavity and those with previously corrected uterine cavitary lesions, assessed by hysteroscopy in ICSI cycles. Study Design: A prospective cohort study. Materials and Methods: The study included women undergoing ICSI cycles. Patients were allocated into two groups, patients with normal uterine cavity (group 1, n=122) and patients with previously corrected uterine cavitary lesions (group < br />2, n=122). Office hysteroscopy was performed post-menstrual. The main outcome measure was clinical pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomes were the implantation rate and the take home baby rate. Results: In both groups the mean±SD of the total amount of gonadotrophins used, duration of stimulation, peak estradiol level, endometrial thickness and number of mature follicles, the implantation rate there was not statistically significant different in both groups (2.22 ± 0.84 vs. 2.46 ± 0.95, p=0.419). Also, the pregnancy rate showed no statistically significant difference between both groups (33.6% vs. 23.8%, p=0.089). Conclusion: Correction of uterine cavitary lesions makes the implantation rate and pregnancy rate to be comparable to women with normal uterine cavity. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Hysteroscopy; ICSI; pregnancy rate; uterine cavity | ||||
Statistics Article View: 178 PDF Download: 163 |
||||