Aortic Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch as a Risk Factor on Regression of Left Ventricular Mass | ||||
Zagazig University Medical Journal | ||||
Article 15, Volume 28, Issue 6, November 2022, Page 1289-1295 PDF (337.37 K) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/zumj.2022.147368.2594 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
Tamer Salem Alawady 1; Mamdouh Elsharawy2; Amr Hassan Mansour3; amr el sayed tawfek4; Mohamed Abdelbasit 5; Alawab Mohamed Mesallam6; Ashraf Hamed Abdelsalam7 | ||||
1cardiothoracic surgery department, faculty medicine, zagazig university, zagazig, egypt | ||||
2Cardiothoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt | ||||
3Department of Cardiothoracic surgery, Zagazig University, Egypt | ||||
4Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery,Zagazig Univeristy,Zagazig, Egypt | ||||
5Cardiology zagazig university | ||||
6Cardiothoracic surgery, Alahrar Educational hospital, Zagazig, Egypt | ||||
7Cardiothoracic surgery department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Objective: Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) of the aortic prosthesis is frequent trouble following aortic valve replacement (AVR). The residual high transprosthetic pressure gradient (PG) could interrupt left ventricular mass regression (LVMR). The purpose of this study was to assess the frequency of PPM as well as its impact on LVMR postoperatively. Methods: 106 patients were prospectively evaluated after AVR for aortic stenosis (AS) from Jan 2016 to Dec 2021. Patients were classified into three groups based on the effective orifice area index (EOAI) (cm2/m2); Group A (≥0.85), B (0.8-0.84), and C (< 0.8). Follow-up of LVMR was performed postoperatively on all patients after six months. Results: We didn’t record significant changes in basic data among studied groups away from the basal surface area, which was substantially higher in group C (Mean 2.4, P | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Keywords: Aortic valve replacement; Patient prosthesis mismatch; Prosthesis; LV; PPM | ||||
Statistics Article View: 136 PDF Download: 166 |
||||