Dehydroepiandrosterone supplementation within a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in patients with poor ovarian response | ||||
| The Egyptian Journal of Fertility of Sterility | ||||
| Article 2, Volume 14, Issue 1 - Serial Number 11106352, January 2011, Page 6-10 PDF (1.36 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/egyfs.2011.254862 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Author | ||||
| Ayman Nady Abdelmeged | ||||
| Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Minia Infertility Research Unit, Minia University, Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Objective: The aim of this study was to compare IVF treatment outcomes between pre- and post-treatment cycles among a cohort of women with known decreased ovarian reserve, using dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) supplementation. Materials Methods: A prospective cohort study in a private assisted reproduction centre. Twenty-five women with significantly diminished ovarian reserve had IVF cycle before and after 50 mg/day DHEA for 2 months, with otherwise identical hormonal stimulation. Results: After treatment with DHEA, patients demonstrated a significant improvement in day 3 FSH (7.1 ± 0.5 vs. 9.9 ± 1.5 mIU/ml) (p < 0.05), day 3 E2 (325.46 ± 9.7 vs. 227.37 ± 16.95 pmol/L) (p < 0.05), day 3 testosterone (79.84 ±10.93 vs. 54. 64 ±10.31 μg/dl) (p < 0.05) , day 3 DHEA-S (99.94 ± 15.4 vs. 62 .54 ± 16.3 μg/dl) (p < 0.05), number of follicles demonstrated by ULS on the day of hCG administration[Total (9 ±1.5 vs.6 ± 1.5) (p=0.01), ≥ 14 mm (4.5±1.5 vs.3.5 ± 1.5) (p = 0.01) and ≥ 17 mm( 4.5 ±1.5 vs. 2.5 ±1.5 ) (p = 0.01)], serum E2 level on the day of hCG administration (4760±1524 vs. 3800±1684 pmol/L)(p < br />= 0.001), number of oocytes retrieved (7.5 ± 0.5 vs. 5.5 ± 0.5 ) (p = 0.01) and number of mature oocytes (Metaphase II) (5.5± 0.5 vs. 3.5± 0.5 )( p = 0.01). Although there were significant differences in fertilization rate (72.6 % vs. 45.8 %) (p < 0.005), percentage of grade I/II embryos (73.6 % vs. 50.4%) (p= 0.005), cumulative embryo score per oocyte retrieved (18.5±1.2 vs. 10.5±1.2) (p = 0.001) and cancellation rate (15% vs. 40%) (p = 0.001).These were not reflected on biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy rate/cycle or clinical pregnancy rate/embryo transfer. Conclusions: DHEA supplementation for poor responder patients could have beneficial effects on ovarian follicular function, improvement in hormonal profile and embryological data. However, large prospective randomized placebo controlled trials are waited to demonstrate the improvement in clinical pregnancy rate after DHEA supplementation. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Key Words: DHEA; GnRH antagonist; poor responders; IVF | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 52 PDF Download: 34 |
||||
