FIELD EVALUATION OF SOME ATTRACTANTS FOR ATTRACTING ADULTS OF FRUIT FLIES | ||||
| Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research | ||||
| Article 9, Volume 83, Issue 4, December 2005, Page 1625-1634 PDF (2.39 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/ejar.2005.254980 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Author | ||||
| MOHAMED H. SAAFAN | ||||
| Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Evaluation of different attractants for adults of the Mediterranean fruit fly (MFF), Ceratitis capitata (Wied.) and Peach fruit fly (PFF), Baettoc-era zonata (Saund.) was carried out at three locations (orchards) in Sinuris & Ibshaway, Fayoum Governorate through an experiment during May-June, 2003. The mean capture per trap per day "CTD" for MFF adults were 0.20, 0.31, 0.54, 0.58 and 0.83 fly for Buminal 2.5 %, Buminal 5 %, Buminal 10 %, Di-ammonium phosphate 2 % and Di-ammonium phosphate 3 %, respectively. For PFF adults, "CID" were 1.87 flies for Buminal 2.5 %, 2.23 flies for Buminal 5 %, 2.82 flies for Buminal 10 0/0, 6.78 flies for Di-ammonium phosphate 2 % and 5.34 flies for Di-ammonium phosphate 3 %. Di-ammonium phosphate concentrations were more attractant for males and females of MFF & PFF adults than Buminal concentrations. All the attractants attracted PFF adults more than MFF adults, also, all the attractants attracted females more than males for MFF and PFF adults. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 82 PDF Download: 263 |
||||
