Socket shield technique versus sticky bone in immediate dental implant in esthetic zone | ||||
Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science | ||||
Article 2, Volume 25, Issue 4, October 2022, Page 445-453 PDF (1.39 MB) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/ajdsm.2021.62599.1164 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
Ahmed Moustafa abdelraheem 1; Ahmed el feky2; Ahmed Mohammed Hosny 3 | ||||
1oral and maxillofacial surgery, Faculty of dental medicine, Alazhar university, Cairo, boys. | ||||
2Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of dental medicine, Cairo, Boys, Al-Azhar University | ||||
3oral and maxillofacial surgery department , faculty of dental medicine, boys Cairo, alazhar university. | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Objective: The present study was performed to evaluate immediate implant placement with socket-shield technique versus using bone graft filling the jumping gap in the form of sticky bone in maxillary aesthetic zone. Material and Methods: sixteen patients were included in this study (n=16). They were divided into two groups; group (I): eight Patients were subjected to socket shield procedure with immediate implant placement. Group (II): eight Patients were subjected to immediate implant placement with sticky bone in the jumping gap. After surgery each patient were evaluated clinically for: pain values, esthetic results using pink esthetic score (PES) and implant stability using ostell device. All patients received immediate and 6 months postoperative CBCT to assess bone density and the dimensional changes in the labial bone plates. Results: The mean vertical bone loss value after 6 months in group I was 0.28 ± 0.13 mm contrary to group II which was 0.46 ± 0.19 mm which was statistically significant. The mean horizontal bone loss value after 6 months in group I was 0.17 ± .099 mm while in group II it was 0.25 ± 0.13 mm which was statistically not significant. Conclusion: Both Socket shield technique and GBR using sticky bone preserved the labial bone thickness and height with superiority of socket shield in preservation of its height. Key Words: Immediate implant; Socket shield; Sticky bone; | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Immediate implant; Socket shield; Sticky bone | ||||
Statistics Article View: 222 PDF Download: 283 |
||||