Hippocampal Sparing Radiotherapy in Patients with Brain Metastasis: Benefits and Risks. | ||||
| Zagazig University Medical Journal | ||||
| Article 9, Volume 30, Issue 1, January and February 2024, Page 74-81 PDF (706.19 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/zumj.2022.171852.2669 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
sherif zawawy   1; Islam Ramadan2; shabaan Alasaal3; mohamed farouk4; hani eldeep 5
| ||||
| 1Clinical oncology department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Egypt. | ||||
| 2clinical oncology department, AlQabari Hospital , Alexandria, Egypt. | ||||
| 3clinical oncology department, faculty of medicine, Alexandria University. | ||||
| 4Department of Clinical Oncology. Faculty of medicine, Alexandria University, Egypt. | ||||
| 5Neurology department, faculty of medicine, Alexandria University, Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Background: Whole brain irradiation is associated with late adverse events as memory and learning decline due to damage of the hippocampus. The primary objective is to assess memory changes for patients treated with hippocampal sparing IMRT. The secondary objectives are to evaluate local recurrence rate within the hippocampus, response rate and assess time to radiological progression. Methods: Patients were randomized into two groups, the first received conventional whole brain radiotherapy and the second received hippocampal sparing whole brain IMRT, each received 30 Gy over 10 fractions. Patients had baseline memory assessment using Hopkins verbal learning test Revised before and 4 months after radiotherapy and MRI brain before treatment and every 2 months thereafter. Results: 41 patients were assessed, first group (n=20) and second group (n=21). The median follow up duration was 6 months. Regarding neurocognitive outcomes, the first group showed statistically significant decline for total and delayed recalls obtained 4 months after radiotherapy compared to the base line level (p= 0.009 and 0.001) while hippocampus sparing group had no statistically significant differences between pre and post treatment (p= 0.746 and 0.478). No statistically significant differences between both groups regarding partial response rate (40% vs 42.8%) (p= 0.5), median time to radiological progression (3 vs 4 months) (p=0.5) or acute GI – II toxicities (80% vs 61.9%) for group I and II respectively. None of group II patients relapsed within the hippocampus. Conclusions: Hippocampal sparing WBRT is an effective and feasible technique for preservation of neurocognitive functions while maintaining intracranial control. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| brain metastasis; hippocampus sparing radiotherapy; whole brain radiotherapy | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 101 PDF Download: 48 |
||||
