Limitations and Role of disciplinary judge in evidentiary process | ||||
| L' Egypte Contemporaine | ||||
| Article 11, Volume 113, Issue 547 - Serial Number 3, July 2022, Page 68-108 PDF (240.07 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/espesl.2022.144246.1016 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Author | ||||
| Eslam Mohamed Osman | ||||
| مدرس القانون العام كلية الحقوق - جامعة بني سويف | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Evidence plays an essential and important role in determining the administrative responsibility before the administrative judiciary, because the judge considers him decisive to convince the facts before him or not, And since the criminal judge and the disciplinary judge took the doctrine of free proof, which is based on the complete freedom of the judge in proving the lawsuit before him, so we had to discuss the role of the criminal judge and the disciplinary judge and the limits and the role of each of them in proving the lawsuit before them. Our choice of the topic of research 'limits and role of the disciplinary judge in proof' comes from the great importance of proof in general and evidence in the disciplinary field in particular, and given that there are no provisions for proof before the disciplinary judiciary, it was necessary to discuss this research the issue of the role that the disciplinary judge is based on proof And the limits that he must adhere to and not to be infringed. : | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| the principles; authority; evidence; criminal | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 82 PDF Download: 87 |
||||
