Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Nano Chitosan and Chlorohexidine versus Sodium Hypochlorite as Final Rinse against Enterococcus Faecalis | ||||
| Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls | ||||
| Article 2, Volume 10, Issue 1, January 2023, Page 11-17 PDF (800.11 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/adjg.2022.75908.1369 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Sarah Mohamed Nour ElDeen  1; wael kamel 2; Mohammed Rokaya3; Mohamed Aly Sherif4
| ||||
| 1Dental Practitioner in Governmental Medical Center in El Sherouk City | ||||
| 2Professor and head of Endodontic Department Faculty of Dental Medicine, Future University, Professor of Endodontic Department Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. | ||||
| 3Associate Professor and head of Endodontic Department Faculty of Dentistry, Horus University, Egypt, Associate Professor of Endodontic, Endodontic Department Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University- Assiut Branch, Egypt. | ||||
| 4Professor of Microbiology and Immunology Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of nano chitosan and chlorohexidine versus sodium hypochlorite as final rinse against Enterococcus faecalis. Methods: Forty single rooted teeth were selected. All root canals were prepared manually to #50 file. Finally, the teeth were sterilized by gamma rays. Each root canal was inoculated with 0.5 ml of E. faecalis. Specimens were divided randomly into 4 main groups (10 specimens each) according to the irrigating solutions. Group 1: nano chitosan 0.2%, group 2: Chlorhexidine 2%, group 3: alternating solution of nano chitosan 0.2% & Chlorhexidine 2%, and group 4: Sodium hypochlorite 3%. The mean of bacterial count before and after final irrigation by the tested solutions were measured. Results: The highest mean difference value of bacterial count was found in 3% sodium hypochlorite, followed by alternating solution of 0.2% nano chitosan & 2% chlorhexidine, then 2% chlorhexidine, and 0.2% nano chitosan came lastly. However, there was no statistically significant difference among the tested groups. Conclusions: alternating solution of 0.2% nano chitosan & 2% chlorhexidine when used as antibacterial irrigant gives promising results and can be used as an alternative to NaOCl solution. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Nano chitosan; Chlorohexidine; Enterococcus Faecalis; Final rinse | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 149 PDF Download: 128 |
||||
