Provisional Diagnosis versus Laboratory Diagnosis in Women with Vaginal Discharge | ||||
Journal of High Institute of Public Health | ||||
Article 1, Volume 30, Issue 2, April 2000, Page 147-154 | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/jhiph.2000.286589 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
Abdel Fattah H. Abdel Fattah1; Moustafa A. El Gebaly2 | ||||
1Department of Microbiology, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Egypt | ||||
2Department of Obstetric & Gynacology, Ministry of Health, Alexandra, Egypt | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Eighty cases of symptomatic and twenty cases of asymptomatic vaginal discharge attending a gynacological center for family planning were examined to evaluate the causative organisms for vaginal discharge. Also the correlation between the clinical diagnosis and the laboratory diagnosis was studied. The study showed that the laboratory diagnosis of candidal vaginitis was more significant [P<0.05 ] than the clinical ones while it was not the case in bacterial infection or trichomoniasis [P>0.05 ] C.albicans species was the most common isolates from symptomatic and asymptomatic cases [ 17 and 4 isolates respectively ] followed by C. stellatoidea and C. tropicalis. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Provisional Diagnosis; Laboratory Diagnosis; Women; Vaginal Discharge | ||||
Statistics Article View: 73 |
||||