COMPARING PIXEL-BASED TO OBJECT-BASED IMAGE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR ASSESSING LULC CHANGE IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT OF NORTHERN WEST SAUDI ARABIA
(2023). COMPARING PIXEL-BASED TO OBJECT-BASED IMAGE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR ASSESSING LULC CHANGE IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT OF NORTHERN WEST SAUDI ARABIA. EKB Journal Management System, 15(1), 55-76. doi: 10.21608/ejec.2023.286642
. "COMPARING PIXEL-BASED TO OBJECT-BASED IMAGE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR ASSESSING LULC CHANGE IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT OF NORTHERN WEST SAUDI ARABIA". EKB Journal Management System, 15, 1, 2023, 55-76. doi: 10.21608/ejec.2023.286642
(2023). 'COMPARING PIXEL-BASED TO OBJECT-BASED IMAGE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR ASSESSING LULC CHANGE IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT OF NORTHERN WEST SAUDI ARABIA', EKB Journal Management System, 15(1), pp. 55-76. doi: 10.21608/ejec.2023.286642
COMPARING PIXEL-BASED TO OBJECT-BASED IMAGE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR ASSESSING LULC CHANGE IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT OF NORTHERN WEST SAUDI ARABIA. EKB Journal Management System, 2023; 15(1): 55-76. doi: 10.21608/ejec.2023.286642

COMPARING PIXEL-BASED TO OBJECT-BASED IMAGE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR ASSESSING LULC CHANGE IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT OF NORTHERN WEST SAUDI ARABIA

The Egyptian Journal of Environmental Change
Article 7, Volume 15, Issue 1, March 2023, Page 55-76  XML PDF (8.25 MB)
Document Type: Peer-reviewed articles
DOI: 10.21608/ejec.2023.286642
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Abstract
Land use and land cover (LULC) changes in many developing countries are inevitable. In Tabuk, a region northwest of Saudi Arabia, rapid urbanization and an agricultural evolution have led to dramatic changes in LULC over the last 30 years. Increasing land demand to meet food production desire has led to expanding these agricultural areas into previously undeveloped deserted or barren areas. This places immense pressure on valuable water reserves, therefore correctly defining irrigated or non-irrigated agricultural land is important to meet the need for intensive and sustainable agriculture development. The pixel-based image classification technique is often used to assess LULC changes (e.g., Maximum Likelihood Classification (MLC) and Support Vector Machine (SVM)). Object-based image analysis (OBIA) has also been widely used for LULC change detection. Therefore, the paper aims to compare the most common image classification methods for assessing LULC change in the agricultural arid of Tabuk using medium-resolution data from Landsat (1985-2015).
Based exclusively on overall accuracy assessments, there was no advantage to preferring one image analysis method over another for the purposes of assessing LULC changes in arid environments using medium spatial resolution imagery. Visual interpretation, however, shows that the OBIA provided more accurate and satisfying results. Both pixels-based and object-based results indicate their possible further applicability for assessing LULC changes and corresponding studies. The result suggests that OBIA has the potential to be an alternative method over pixel-based methods for assessing LULC information taken over the spatially mixed land cover of arid Saudi Arabia.
Keywords
Arid area; Land use change; Remote sensing; Image Classification; OBIA
References

 

1-     Abd El-Kawy, O. R., Rød, J. K., Ismail, H. A., & Suliman, A. S. (2011). Land use and land cover change detection in the western Nile delta of Egypt using remote sensing data. Applied geography, 31(2), 483-494.‏

2-     Albalawi, E. K., & Kumar, L. (2013). Using remote sensing technology to detect, model and map desertification: a review. J Food Agric Environ, 11, 791-797.

3-     Al-Ahmadi, M. E. (2009). Hydrogeology of the Saq Aquifer Northwest of Tabuk, Northern Saudi Arabia. Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Earth Sciences, 20, 51-66.

4-     Al-Bilbisi, H., and Makhamreh, Z. 2010. A comparison of pixel-based and object-based classification approaches in arid and semi-arid areas of Dead Sea region using Landsat imagery, DIRASAT: Human and Social Sciences, 37 (3): 649-659.

5-     Al-Shayaa, M. S., Baig, M. B., & Straquadine, G. S. (2012). Agricultural extension in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Difficult present and demanding future. J. Anim. Plant Sci, 22(1), 239-246.

6-     Alqurashi, A. F., & Kumar, L. (2014). Land Use and Land Cover Change Detection in the Saudi Arabian Desert Cities of Makkah and Al-Taif Using Satellite Data. Advances in Remote Sensing, 3(03), 106.

7-     Anderson, J. R. (1976). A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data (Vol. 964): US Government Printing Office.

8-     Bhaskaran, S., Paramananda, S., & Ramnarayan, M. (2010). Per-pixel and object-oriented classification methods for mapping urban features using Ikonos satellite data. Applied geography, 30(4), 650-665.

9-     Campbell, J. B. (2002). Introduction to Remote Sensing. New York: The Guilford Press; 3 edition.

10- Campbell, & Wynne. (2011). Introduction to remote sensing: Guilford Press.

11- Canty, M. J. (2014). Image analysis, classification and change detection in remote sensing: with algorithms for ENVI/IDL and Python: CRC Press.

12- Congalton, R. G. (1991). A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37(1), 35-46.

13- Congalton, R.G. and Green, K. (2009) Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices. 2nd Edition, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton.

14- Chavez, P.S., Jr. 1996. Image-based atmospheric corrections–revisited and improved. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 62(9): pp.1025-1036.

15- Foody, G.M. and Mathur, A. (2004) A Relative Evaluation of Multiclass Image Classification by Support Vector Machines. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42, 1335-1343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2004.82725

16- Foody, G. M. (2002). Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment, 80(1), 185-201.

17- Galletti, C. S., & Myint, S. W. (2014). Land-use mapping in a mixed urban-agricultural arid landscape using object-based image analysis: A case study from Maricopa, Arizona. Remote Sensing, 6(7), 6089-6110.

18- Goodin, D. G., Anibas, K. L., & Bezymennyi, M. (2015). Mapping land cover and land use from object-based classification: an example from a complex agricultural landscape. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 36(18), 4702-4723.

19- Kraemer, R., Prishchepov, A. V., Müller, D., Kuemmerle, T., Radeloff, V. C., Dara, A., & Frühauf, M. (2015). Long-term agricultural land-cover change and potential for cropland expansion in the former Virgin Lands area of Kazakhstan. Environmental Research Letters, 10(5), 054012.‏

20- Jensen. (2004). Digital change detection. Introductory digital image processing: A remote sensing perspective, 467-494

21- Kux, H., & Souza, U. D. (2012). Object-based image analysis of WORLDVIEW-2 satellite data for the classification of mangrove areas in the city of São Luís, Maranhão State, Brazil. ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 1, 95-100.

22- Laliberte, A. S., Rango, A., Havstad, K. M., Paris, J. F., Beck, R. F., McNeely, R., & Gonzalez, A. L. (2004). Object-oriented image analysis for mapping shrub encroachment from 1937 to 2003 in southern New Mexico. Remote sensing of Environment, 93(1-2), 198-210.‏ ISO 690

23- Lu, D., Hetrick, S., Moran, E., & Li, G. (2010). Detection of urban expansion in an urban-rural landscape with multitemporal QuickBird images. Journal of applied remote sensing, 4(041880), 041880.

24- Li, M., Zang, S., Zhang, B., Li, S., & Wu, C. (2014). A review of remote sensing image classification techniques: The role of spatial-contextual information. European Journal of Remote Sensing, 47, 389-411.

25- Lillesand T. M. and Kiefer R. W., “Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation,” John Willey and Sons, New York, 1999.

26- Lillesand, T., Kiefer, R. W., & Chipman, J. (2014). Remote sensing and image interpretation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

27- Löw, F., Fliemann, E., Abdullaev, I., Conrad, C., & Lamers, J. P. A. (2015). Mapping abandoned agricultural land in Kyzyl-Orda, Kazakhstan using satellite remote sensing. Applied geography, 62, 377-390.

28- Lu, D., Mausel, P., Brondizio, E., & Moran, E. (2004). Change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25(12), 2365-2401.

29- Lu, D., & Weng, Q. (2007). A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28(5), 823-870.

30- Mountrakis, G., Im, J. and Ogole, C. (2011) Support Vector Machines in Remote Sensing: A Review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 66, 247-259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.11.001

31- Myint, S. W., Gober, P., Brazel, A., Grossman-Clarke, S., & Weng, Q. (2011). Per-pixel vs. object-based classification of urban land cover extraction using high spatial resolution imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115(5), 1145-1161.

32- Ram, B., & Kolarkar, A. (1993). Remote sensing application in monitoring land-use changes in arid Rajasthan. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 14(17), 3191-3200.

33- Rastgoo, M., & Hasanfard, A. (2021). Desertification in Agricultural Lands: Approaches to Mitigation. In Deserts and Desertification. IntechOpen.

34- Rouse Jr, J. W., Haas, R. H., Deering, D. W., Schell, J. A., & Harlan, J. C. (1974). Monitoring the vernal advancement and retrogradation (green wave effect) of natural vegetation (No. E75-10354).‏

35- Shalaby, A. and Tateishi, R. (2007) Remote Sensing and GIS for Mapping and Monitoring LC and Land-Use Changes in the Northwestern Coastal Zone of Egypt. Applied Geography, 27, 28-41.

36- The General Authority for Statistics. (2015). Population and housing census. https://www.stats.gov.sa/en/13. Retrieved 2015

37- Turner, W., Rondinini, C., Pettorelli, N., Mora, B., Leidner, A. K., Szantoi, Z., Herold, M. (2015). Free and open-access satellite data are key to biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 182, 173-176.

38- USGS. (2015). Landsat data. Accessed December 2015 from https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/

39- Vapnik, V. N. (1999). An overview of statistical learning theory. Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on, 10(5), 988-999.

40- Vijayan, L., & AlTalhi, F. A. (2015). Significance of Meteorological Parameters in the Implementation of Agriculture Engineering Practices in and Around Tabuk Region, KSA. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 3(5), 53-65.

41- Walter, V. (2004). Object-based classification of remote sensing data for change detection. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 58(3), 225-238.

42- Wang, X., Liu, S., Du, P., Liang, H., Xia, J., & Li, Y. (2018). Object-based change detection in urban areas from high spatial resolution images based on multiple features and ensemble learning. Remote Sensing, 10(2), 276.‏

43-                    Whiteside T.G., Boggs G.S. and Maier S.W . (2011) Comparing object- based and pixel- based classifications for mapping savannas, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 13(6), 884 – 893.

44- Zhang, Z., Li, N., Wang, X., Liu, F., & Yang, L. (2016). A comparative study of urban expansion in Beijing, Tianjin and Tangshan from the 1970s to 2013. Remote Sensing, 8(6), 496.

45- Zhu, Z.; Woodcock, C.E. Continuous change detection and classification of land cover using all available Landsat data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2014, 144, 152–171.

46- Zheng, B., Myint, S. W., Thenkabail, P. S., & Aggarwal, R. M. (2015). A support vector machine to identify irrigated crop types using time-series Landsat NDVI data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 34, 103-112.

Statistics
Article View: 316
PDF Download: 328