Effect Of Er, Cr: YSGG And Er: YAG Lasers During Debonding Of Orthodontic Ceramic Brackets: In Vitro Study | ||||
| Dental Science Updates | ||||
| Article 4, Volume 4, Issue 1, March 2023, Page 35-43 PDF (1.36 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/dsu.2023.125963.1118 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Ibrahim Fouad Hachem  1; Walaa Elsayed Mohamed Elgemeay2; Rami Maher Ghali3; Abbadi Elkadi4
| ||||
| 1Orthodontics, faculty of dentistry, Suez canal university, Ismailia, Egypt. | ||||
| 2Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt. | ||||
| 3Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt | ||||
| 4Professor of Orthodontic Faculty of Dentistry King Salman International University Suez Canal University | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Abstract Introduction: Ceramic brackets debonding is considered a clinical challenge due to their low fracture toughness and high shear bond strength. The shear bond strength must be reduced to facilitate removal. Aim: Debonding polycrystalline ceramic brackets with Er: YAG and Er, Cr: YSGG lasers, and comparing their impacts on adhesive remnant index (ARI) and enamel surface roughness (ESR) to the traditional debonding technique. Materials & Methods: 60 polycrystalline ceramic brackets were bonded to 60 extracted premolars and divided into 3 groups: group 1(control group) contained 12 premolars that were debonded conventionally with a debonding plier, group 2:contained 24 premolars that were debonded with Er, Cr: YSGG laser and was divided into two equal subgroups: group 2A: the samples were irradiated with Er, Cr: YSGG laser at power 9 W & group 2B: the samples were irradiated with Er, Cr: YSGG laser at power 6 W, & group 3: contained 24 premolars that were debonded with Er: YAG laser and was divided into two equal subgroups: group 3A: the samples were irradiated with Er: YAG laser at power 9 W & group 3B: the samples were irradiated with Er: YAG laser at power 6 W. The debonded samples were examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) at 20x magnification for ARI scoring and at 60x magnification forenamel surface roughness after polishing. Results: Regarding ARI, the results showed that group 2A had the highest percentage for score 0 and group 3A for score 2, whileregarding ESR, group 2B had the highest percentage for score 2. Conclusion: Whencompared to the traditional procedure, using Er, Cr: YSGG and Er: YAG lasers to debond polycrystalline ceramic brackets may reduce the risk of enamel damage. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| ARI; Debonding; ESR; Polycrystalline; YAG; YSGG | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 152 PDF Download: 313 |
||||
