Clinical and radiographic evaluation of peri-implant tissue changes associated with use of standard versus customized healing abutments | ||||
Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science | ||||
Article 6, Volume 26, Issue 2, April 2023, Page 229-239 PDF (870.21 K) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/ajdsm.2023.179122.1389 | ||||
![]() | ||||
Authors | ||||
Taha Mohammed Almadani ![]() ![]() | ||||
1Periodontology, Oral medicine, Diagnosis and Oral Radiology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, (Boys Cairo) Al-Azhar university. | ||||
2Department of Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Diagnosis & Oral Radiology. al-azhar University | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Background: Risks of esthetic complications has been reported following dental implant insertion; hence it was hypothesis that a customized healing abutment could improve the peri-implant tissue healing. Aim: To evaluate healing around implants received a customized compared to a standard healing abutment. Patients & Methods: Twelve patients (eight females and four males aged 33-43) had two nearly comparable partial edentulous spaces on both sides of one jaw, split mouth technique were applied to divide theme into two groups: Group 1 sites received delayed implant with standard healing abutment; Group 2 sites received delayed implant with a customized healing abutment that fabricated in resin. Results: Twenty four implants were inserted successfully in the two groups. The Papilla Index was significantly higher in the customized than in the standard group at 2 and 3 months. The bone loss at mesial and distal sites was significantly higher in the customized than in the standard group at 6 and 9 months. Conclusion: Customized healing abutment group showed most favorable outcomes compared with that of standard healing abutment assessed with the criteria of PI and MBL. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Healing abutment; peri-implant soft tissue; gingival emergence profile; delayed implant; template for customization | ||||
Statistics Article View: 151 PDF Download: 231 |
||||