The Performance of Some Outranking Methods for Weapon Locating and Fire Correction Radar Selection: a Comparative Study | ||||
| The International Conference on Mathematics and Engineering Physics | ||||
| Article 7, Volume 8, International Conference on Mathematics and Engineering Physics (ICMEP-8), April 2016, Page 1-18 PDF (237.29 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/icmep.2016.29618 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Amr A. Abdelhalim1; Aly M. Ragab2; Kamel A. Elhadad3 | ||||
| 1Corresponding author:Military Technical College, Cairo, Egypt. Tel.: +2 010 074 087 87. | ||||
| 2Department of Operations Research, Institute of Statistical Studies and Research, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt. | ||||
| 3Military Technical College, Cairo, Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Abstract Selection of the best weapon locating and fire correction radar is a key success factor for artillery in performing the tasks entrusted to it as an essential part of the army.The importance and complexity of the problem due to involving conflicting criteria call for analytical methods rather than intuitive decisions. This paper illustrates the application of sixdifferent outrankingmethods to the problem of selecting such radar among a finite set of candidate alternatives. The attributes (criteria) aredefined to express the performance of particular alternatives (radars) relevant for thedecision maker.The agreement between the obtained ranks are measured using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Radar selection; Outranking methods; Performance score; Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 165 PDF Download: 262 |
||||
