RE-OPERATIVE CSF DIVERSION VERSUS DIRECT SURGICAL ATTACK IN POSTERIOR FOSSA TUMOURS WITH SECONDARY HYDROCEPHALUS | ||||
Ain Shams Medical Journal | ||||
Volume 74, Issue 1, March 2023, Page 207-222 PDF (913.69 K) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/asmj.2023.298320 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
Ahmed Zahran1; Hussein Alsayed Moharram1; Mohamed Mostafa Hany1; Hatem A. Sabry1; Ibrahim Abdelmohsen 2 | ||||
1Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. | ||||
2Neurosurgery department, Faculty of medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Background: Posterior fossa tumors could usually be complicated by secondary hydrocephalus due to obstruction or compression of the 4th ventricle. Aim of the work: To analyze the efficacy of preoperative CSF diversion versus direct tumour attack in long-term management of hydrocephalus. Patients and Methods: A retrospective study carried out on 30 patients presenting with posterior fossa tumors and secondary obstructive hydrocephalus managed at Ain Shams University Hospitals. Results: About one third of posterior fossa tumour patients become shunt dependent, surgical excision alone could be life threatening. Midline posterior fossa tumors were associated with a higher incidence of shunt dependance compared with those that only affected the cerebellar hemispheres or the CPA. Conclusion: Less than one-third of patients with posterior fossa tumours require a CSF diversion during the course of their illness, the fact that refutes the role of prophylactic shunting or ETV. However, higher post-operative morbidity and mortality in cases with direct tumour attack raises the protective role of preoperative CSF diversion especially in midline posterior fossa tumours. Recommendations: Finally, previous results may need to be strengthened in the future study of more cases. | ||||
Statistics Article View: 69 PDF Download: 86 |
||||