Describing the relationship between smart cities and sustainability by focusing on the characteristics of smart cities to help progress that is more effective
Sheriff Sabry, G. (2022). Describing the relationship between smart cities and sustainability by focusing on the characteristics of smart cities to help progress that is more effective. EKB Journal Management System, 28(1), 235-261. doi: 10.21608/jsfc.2022.299829
Gehad Sheriff Sabry. "Describing the relationship between smart cities and sustainability by focusing on the characteristics of smart cities to help progress that is more effective". EKB Journal Management System, 28, 1, 2022, 235-261. doi: 10.21608/jsfc.2022.299829
Sheriff Sabry, G. (2022). 'Describing the relationship between smart cities and sustainability by focusing on the characteristics of smart cities to help progress that is more effective', EKB Journal Management System, 28(1), pp. 235-261. doi: 10.21608/jsfc.2022.299829
Sheriff Sabry, G. Describing the relationship between smart cities and sustainability by focusing on the characteristics of smart cities to help progress that is more effective. EKB Journal Management System, 2022; 28(1): 235-261. doi: 10.21608/jsfc.2022.299829

Describing the relationship between smart cities and sustainability by focusing on the characteristics of smart cities to help progress that is more effective

المجلة العلمية لقطاع کليات التجارة بجامعة الأزهر
Volume 28, Issue 1, June 2022, Page 235-261  XML PDF (191.17 K)
Document Type: المقالة الأصلية
DOI: 10.21608/jsfc.2022.299829
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
Gehad Sheriff Sabry*
CIC- School of Business at Sheikh Zayed Campus
Abstract
الملخص
تم إجراء العديد من الأبحاث حول موضوع المدن الذكية، حيث تم التعرض في بعضاً من هذه الأبحاث إلى مبادئ المدن الذكية ومكوناتها وتقنياتها وكيفية بناء مدن ذكية.
 أم في هذا المقال قد حاولنا التعرض لمفهوم المدن الذكية من منظور مختلف وهو مفهوم استدامة المدن الذكية، حيث الربط بين مفهوم المدن الذكية والتنمية الحضرية المستدامة. فالمدن الذكية تعني الاندماج الطبيعي لأنظمة تكنولوجية المعلومات والتقنيات الحديثة والبنية التحتية المادية والبنية التحتية الاجتماعية والتجارية التي تتعاون فيما بينها لتزويد صانعي القرار ببيانات ذكية وقابلة للتنفيذ.
  لذا أصبحت المدن الذكية المستدامة من خلال ثورة تكنولوجيا المعلومات لديها القدرة على إيجاد حلول جديدة للمشاكل الحالية والمستقبلية، كما أصبح لديها القدرة على الاستفادة من استثمارات البنية التحتية الحالية وكذلك المخططة لتحسين نوعية حياة الناس من خلال تقديم خدمات أيسر وأسهل، وتوفير مناخ استثماري مناسب للشركات، وأيضاَ زيادة كفاءة الموارد الحكومية وشفافيتها. وبناءً عليه يمكن النظر إلى مفهوم استدامة المدينة الذكية كإطار لتحقيق رؤية متقدمة وحديثة للتحضر.
Abstract
Many types of research have been undertaken on smart cities, including their principles, components, technologies, and how to construct a smart city. However, we attempted in this paper to promote the smart city strategy by recognizing the notion of a sustainable urban development approach. That Smart city is a natural amalgamation of systems, IT infrastructure, physical infrastructure, and social and business infrastructure that the technologies collaborate to provide decision-makers with intelligent and actionable data. 
Where,  the sustainability of smart cities through the information technology revolution become has the ability to can finding novel solutions to current and future problems, make use of existing and planned infrastructure investments to improve people's quality of life, provide a favorable investment climate for businesses, and increase government resource efficiency and transparency. Therefore, we can be viewed the concept of sustainability of smart city as a framework for realizing an advanced and modern vision of urbanization.
 
Keywords
Keywords:  relationship; between- smart cities; sustainability- focusing characteristics -to -help progress -more -effective
References
References

  • Ahvenniemi, H., Huovila, A., Pinto-Seppä, I., & Airaksinen, M. (2017). What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities?
  • Andrade, J. B. S. O., Ribeiro, J. M. P., Fernandez, F., Bailey, C., Barbosa, S. B., & da Silva Neiva, S. (2016). The adoption of strategies for sustainable cities: A comparative study between Newcastle and Florianopolis focused on urban mobility. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, 681–694.
  • Assessing the local impacts of smart urban attributes. The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25, 97–113.
  • Angelidou, M. (2014). Smart city policies: A spatial approach. Cities, 41, S3–S11.
  • Ang, M. (2015). Smart cities: A conjuncture of four forces. Cities, 47, 95–106.
  • Antonsen, H. (2017) Platform Infrastructure as a Driver of Smart City Development. Master Thesis. University of Oslo, Norway.
  • Andrea Caragliu, Chiara Del Bo & Peter Nijkamp (2011)," Smart Cities in Europe" January 2009 Journal of Urban Technology 18(0048), Pages 65-82
  • Azamat Abdullaev, January 2011 "A Smart World: A Development Model for Intelligent Cities Cities TY  - BOOK. Publisher: IEEE
  • Bayulken, B., & Huisingh, D. (2015). Are lessons from eco-towns helping planners make more effective progress in transforming cities into sustainable urban systems: A literature review (part 2 of 2). Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, 152–165.
  • Caragliu, A., Del bo, C., Nijkamp, P. (2009). Smart cities in Europe. Serie research memoranda 0048 (VU University Amsterdam, faculty of economics, business administration and econometrics).
  • Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-garcia, J. R., Mellouli, S., & Nahon, K., et al. (2012). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. In Proceedings of the 45th international conference on system sciences, Hawaii.
  • Cosgrave, E., & Tryfonas, T. (2012). Exploring the relationship between smart city policy and implementation. In SMART 2012: The first international conference on smart systems, devices, and technologies, May 27–June 1, 2012, Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Cocchia, A. (2014). Smart and digital city: A systematic literature review. In Smart city (pp. 13–43). Berlin: Springer.
  • Cohen, B., & Amorós, J. E. (2014). Municipal demand-side policy tools and the strategic management of technology life cycles. Tec novation, 34(12), 797–806.
  • Dizdaroglu, D., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2016). Integrating urban ecosystem sustainability assessment into policy-making: Insights from the gold Coast City. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 59(11), 1982–2006.
  • Dhingra, M., & Chattopadhyay, S. (2016). Advancing smartness of traditional settlements-case analysis of Indian and Arab old cities. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 5(2), 549–563.
  • Dizdaroglu, D., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2014). A parcel-scale assessment tool to measure sustainability through urban ecosystem components: The MUSIX model. Ecological Indicators, 41(1), 115–130.
  • Edvardsson, I., Yigitcanlar, T., & Pancholi, S. (2016). Knowledge cities research and practice under the microscope: A review of the literature. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 14(4), 537–564.
  • Frenchman, D., Joroff, M., & Albericci, A. (2011). Smart cities as engines of sustainable growth. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, prepared for the World Bank Institute
  • George Cristian Lazaroiu and Mariacristina Rosica, 2012, "Definition methodology for the smart cities model, vol. 47, issue 1, 326-332
  • Gabrielle, F. (2017) the Origin and Implementation of the Smart-Sustainable City Concept the Case of Malmö-Sweden. Master Thesis, Lund University, University of Manchester, and the University of the Aegean. Sweden, Manchester, Lesvos, Greece.
  • Kramers, A., Höjer, M., Lövehagen, N., & Wangel, J. (2014). Smart sustainable cities–Exploring ICT solutions for reduced energy use in cities. Environmental Modeling & Software, 56, 52–62.
  • Lazaroiu, G. C., & Roscia, M. (2012). Definition methodology for the smart cities model. Energy, 47(1), 326–332.
  • Lee, J. H., Hancock, M. G., & Hu, M. C. (2014).Towards an effective framework for building smart cities: Lessons from Seoul and San Francisco. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 89, 80–99.
  • Marco Pellicano, Mario Calabrese, Francesca Loia, Gennaro Maione "Value Co-Creation Practices in Smart City Ecosystem, Journal of Service Science and Management, Vol.12 No.1, January 11, 2019
  • Nam and Pardo (2011), Conceptualizing Smart City with Dimensions of Technology, People, and Institutions, Vol.12 No.1, January 11, 2019.
  • National League of Cities (2016) Trends in Smart City Development.
  • OECD 2020, Smart Cities and Inclusive, Growth Building on the outcomes of the 1st OECD Roundtable on Smart Cities and Inclusive Growth, the paper are published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD.
  • Droege 1977 Intelligent Environments: Spatial Aspects of the Information Revolution Kindle Edition Book.
  • PwC and FICCI (2015) India: Surging to a Smarter Future.
  • Song, Y., Wang, X., Yi, T., Wu, P., Sutrisna, M. and Cheng, J. (2017) Trends and Opportunities of BIM-GIS Integration in the Architecture, Engineering and Construction Industry: A Review from a Spatio-Temporal Statistical Perspective. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 6, 397.
  • Yigitcanlar, T., & Lee, S. H. (2014). Korean ubiquitous Eco- city: A smart-sustainable urban form or a branding hoax?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 89, 100–114.
  • https://www.datek.no/dv-cms/resources/masterhaakoaan-1.pdf
  • https://www.pwc.in/assets/pdfs/publications/2015/india-surging-to-a-smarter-future.pdf
  • https://www.nlc.org/sites/default/files/2017-
  • https://www.scirp.org/(S(351jmbntvnsjt1aadkposzje))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=2431502>
Statistics
Article View: 69
PDF Download: 192