Proximal segment positioning using pre-bent plates locating surgical guides versus conventional maneuver in mandibular setback surgery. A randomized clinical trial.
Omara, M., Elhadidy, M., Khairy, N., Ali, S. (2023). Proximal segment positioning using pre-bent plates locating surgical guides versus conventional maneuver in mandibular setback surgery. A randomized clinical trial.. EKB Journal Management System, 69(3), 1847-1857. doi: 10.21608/edj.2023.212270.2561
Mohammed Omara; Maha Elhadidy; Nesrine Khairy; Sherif Ali. "Proximal segment positioning using pre-bent plates locating surgical guides versus conventional maneuver in mandibular setback surgery. A randomized clinical trial.". EKB Journal Management System, 69, 3, 2023, 1847-1857. doi: 10.21608/edj.2023.212270.2561
Omara, M., Elhadidy, M., Khairy, N., Ali, S. (2023). 'Proximal segment positioning using pre-bent plates locating surgical guides versus conventional maneuver in mandibular setback surgery. A randomized clinical trial.', EKB Journal Management System, 69(3), pp. 1847-1857. doi: 10.21608/edj.2023.212270.2561
Omara, M., Elhadidy, M., Khairy, N., Ali, S. Proximal segment positioning using pre-bent plates locating surgical guides versus conventional maneuver in mandibular setback surgery. A randomized clinical trial.. EKB Journal Management System, 2023; 69(3): 1847-1857. doi: 10.21608/edj.2023.212270.2561

Proximal segment positioning using pre-bent plates locating surgical guides versus conventional maneuver in mandibular setback surgery. A randomized clinical trial.

Egyptian Dental Journal
Volume 69, Issue 3 - Serial Number 2, July 2023, Page 1847-1857  XML PDF (1.87 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2023.212270.2561
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Mohammed Omara email orcid 1; Maha Elhadidyorcid 2; Nesrine Khairyorcid 3; Sherif Aliorcid 3
1Lecturer at Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
2Lecturer at Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
3Associate Professor at Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Abstract
Purpose: Condylar orientation in the glenoid housing is a critical and most demanding step after proximal segment separation in mandibular setback surgery, as it affects postoperative skeletal stability and occlusion. This study aimed to assess the proximal segment position after fixation using surgical guides and pre-bent plates compared to the manual free hand proximal segment seating.

Methods: Twenty patients with skeletal class III malocclusion were randomly allocated to two groups. Both proximal and distal segments were repositioned using osteotomy/screw holes and plate locating surgical guides with pre-bent plates osteosynthesis in the intervention group, while manual free hand proximal segment positioning was performed in the control group.

Results: Proximal segment position after fixation was assessed using computed tomography. Bodily and angular condylar deviation was significantly lower for the intervention group (X-axis: 0.03 ± 0.02, Y-axis: 0.02 ± 0.03, Z-axis: 0.03 ± 0.03 mm), (Axial: 0.24 ± 0.28, Coronal: 0.24 ± 0.19, Sagittal: 0.29 ± 0.13°) compared to the control group (X-axis: 1.38 ± 0.48, Y-axis: 1.35 ± 0.51, Z-axis: 1.66 ± 0.15 mm), (Axial: 2.79 ± 1.51, Coronal: 3.14 ± 2.28, Sagittal: 2.49 ± 1.40°).

Conclusion: Computer guided approach significantly decreased proximal segment displacement compared to the manual free hand technique.
Keywords
Computer guided surgery; Patient specific guides; Condylar positioning devices; Orthognathic Surgery; Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy
Statistics
Article View: 143
PDF Download: 64