Monitoring Urban Growth and Change Detection in Built-up Areas with High-Resolution Satellite Imageries
Mostafa, Y., besheer, M., Abbas, Y., ALI, M. (2023). Monitoring Urban Growth and Change Detection in Built-up Areas with High-Resolution Satellite Imageries. EKB Journal Management System, 51(5), 269-285. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2023.212966.1233
Yasser Mostafa; mohamed besheer; Yusuf Abbas; Mohamed ALI. "Monitoring Urban Growth and Change Detection in Built-up Areas with High-Resolution Satellite Imageries". EKB Journal Management System, 51, 5, 2023, 269-285. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2023.212966.1233
Mostafa, Y., besheer, M., Abbas, Y., ALI, M. (2023). 'Monitoring Urban Growth and Change Detection in Built-up Areas with High-Resolution Satellite Imageries', EKB Journal Management System, 51(5), pp. 269-285. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2023.212966.1233
Mostafa, Y., besheer, M., Abbas, Y., ALI, M. Monitoring Urban Growth and Change Detection in Built-up Areas with High-Resolution Satellite Imageries. EKB Journal Management System, 2023; 51(5): 269-285. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2023.212966.1233

Monitoring Urban Growth and Change Detection in Built-up Areas with High-Resolution Satellite Imageries

JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences
Article 1, Volume 51, Issue 5, September and October 2023, Page 269-285  XML PDF (2.38 MB)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.21608/jesaun.2023.212966.1233
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Yasser Mostafa email orcid 1; mohamed besheer2; Yusuf Abbas2; Mohamed ALI3
1Civil Eng. Dpt. Faculty of Engineering, Sohag University
2Civil Eng. Dept., Faculty of Engineering, Assuit University, Assuit, Egypt
3Civil Engineer MSc Student
Abstract
Recent developments in remote sensing provide very high-resolution imageries that are partially in competition with aerial images. This paper presents an evaluation of using IKONOS-2 and WorldView-2 satellite imageries for monitoring the growth of the built-up areas in the southern part of Assiut City between 2006 and 2016. In addition, a comparison between aerial orthoimage and satellite imagery was carried out. Also, a set of satellite imagery was downloaded from the Google Earth Pro application, and used in this study to determine the rate of spatial growth in the southern part of Assiut City between 2011 and 2022.
The results of this study show that: Most map features can be detected and manually recognized from WorldView-2 imageries at a good level, while building detection was perfect. The applied change detection technique using IKONOS-2 imagery and WorldView-2 imagery shows that the growth of the built-up area in the south part of Assiut City between 2006 and 2016 is 783499.2 m2, representing about 16.89 % of the total test area. Recent satellite imageries from open sources such as Google Earth were used successfully to determine the rate of spatial growth of the southern part of Assiut City in the period from 2011 to 2022. The spatial growth in this period was found to be increased dramatically, especially between 2014 and 2016. Remarkable negative changes were found in the agricultural lands due to the spatial growth of the built-up area in the south direction of Assiut City.
Keywords
Urban growth; Change detection; image processing; information contents
References
  1. Almutairi, A., 2000, Monitoring land-cover change detection in an arid urban environment: A comparison of change detection techniques. M.SC Thesis, college of Arts and Sciences, West Virginia University. USA.
  2. Bing Li, Yong Xian, Daqiao Zhang, Juan Su, Xiaoxiang Hu, Weilin Guo (2021)  Multi-Sensor Image Fusion: A Survey of the State of the Art
  3. Journal of Computer and Communications, Vol.9 No.6, June 21, 2021
  4. Congalton, R.G., 1991.A review of assessing the accuracy of classification of remotely sensed data, Remote Sensing of Environment, 37:35–46.
  5. Congalton, R.G., and K. Green, 2008. Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices, Second edition, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, Florida).
  6. Erdas imaging 9.1 field guides, 2008. volume one, version 9.1 (Erdas), Atlanta, USA.
  7. Farrag A. Farrag, Yasser G. Mostafa, Nasser A. Mohamed (2020) Detecting Land Cover Changes Using VHR Satellite Images: A Comparative Study. Journal of Engineering Sciences Assiut University, Faculty of Engineering, Vol. 48 No. 2 March 2020 PP. 200–211
  8. Farrag, A., and Mostafa, Y., 2006 "Comparison of Land Cover Change Detection Techniques with Satellite Images: Case Study in Assiut, Egypt" Civil Engineering Research Magazine, Faculty of Engineering, Al-Azhar University, Volume 28, No. (3), pp. 983- 996.
  9. Gene Dial, Howard Bowen, Frank Gerlach, Jacek Grodecki, and Rick Oleszczuk,
  10. 2003. IKONOS satellite, imagery, and products. Remote Sensing of Environment 88, pp. 23–36
  11. Ghassemian, H., 2016. "A review of remote sensing image fusion methods". Information Fusion, 32, pp.75-89.
  12. González-Audícana, M., Saleta, J.L., Catalán, R.G. and García, R., 2004. "Fusion of multispectral and panchromatic images using improved IHS and PCA mergers based on wavelet decomposition". IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote sensing, 42(6), pp.1291-1299.
  13. Mitchell H.B., 2010. Image Fusion Theories, Techniques and Applications.Scientific
  14. Publishing Services Pvt. Ltd., Chennai, India, 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
  15. James Anderson., 2002, A comparison of four change detection techniques for two urban areas in the United States. Masters of Arts in geography, Eberly College of Arts and Sciences, West Virginia University USA.
  16. Lillesand and Kiefer., 1994, Remote sensing and image interpretation (third edition). John wiley & Sons, Inc. New York. chichester. Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore.
  17. Mas, J.F. 1999. Monitoring land-cover changes: a comparison of change detection techniques. Int. J. Remote Sensing. 20: 139-152.
  18. Mamdouh M. El-Hattab 2016, Applying post classification change detection technique to monitor an Egyptian coastal zone (Abu Qir Bay). The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, Volume 19, Issue 1, June 2016, Pages 23-36
  19. Radhadevi, P. V.   V.Nagasubramanian, Archana Mahapatra, S.S.Solanki,  Krishna
  20. Sumanth and Geeta Varadan, 2004. Potential of High-Resolution Indian Remote Sensing Satellite Imagery for Large Scale Mapping.
  21. http://www.isprs.org/proceedings/XXXVIII/1_4_7-W5/paper/Radhadevi-153.pdf . accessed June. 18, 2010.
  22. Sahin, H.G. Buyuksalih, H. Akcin, H.  Topan, S.  Karakis, A. and Marangoz M.2004. Information Content Analysis of KVR-1000 Ortho-Image Based on the Available Topographic M aps in the GIS Environment. EARSEL Workshop on Remote Sensing for Developing Countries, Cairo, 2004.
  23. Samadzadegan F, M Hahn, H Bagherzadeh & M Haeri, 2004. On the geometric accuracy and information content of IKONOS high resolution imagery for map revision. In: XX. Congress of ISPRS, (İstanbul, Türkey).
  24. Satellite imaging corporation web site,2010.
  25. http://www.satimagingcorp.com/satellite-sensors/ikonos.html
  26. Satellite Imaging Corporation website, 2019. "Page Title: IKONOS Satellite Sensor" https://www.satimagingcorp.com/satellite-sensors/ikonos/ Accessed on 14 July, 2019.
  27. Story, M., and R.G. Congalton, 1986. Accuracy assessment: A user’s perspective, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 52(3):397–399.
Statistics
Article View: 215
PDF Download: 467