Surface Roughness of Bis-GMA Free Resin Composite in Comparison With Bis-GMA Containing Resin Composite (In-vitro Study)
yousry, M., Zayed, M., Mahmoud, N. (2023). Surface Roughness of Bis-GMA Free Resin Composite in Comparison With Bis-GMA Containing Resin Composite (In-vitro Study). EKB Journal Management System, 69(3), 2437-2445. doi: 10.21608/edj.2023.210354.2545
Menna Allah yousry; Mohamed Mostafa Zayed; Nermin Alsayed Mahmoud. "Surface Roughness of Bis-GMA Free Resin Composite in Comparison With Bis-GMA Containing Resin Composite (In-vitro Study)". EKB Journal Management System, 69, 3, 2023, 2437-2445. doi: 10.21608/edj.2023.210354.2545
yousry, M., Zayed, M., Mahmoud, N. (2023). 'Surface Roughness of Bis-GMA Free Resin Composite in Comparison With Bis-GMA Containing Resin Composite (In-vitro Study)', EKB Journal Management System, 69(3), pp. 2437-2445. doi: 10.21608/edj.2023.210354.2545
yousry, M., Zayed, M., Mahmoud, N. Surface Roughness of Bis-GMA Free Resin Composite in Comparison With Bis-GMA Containing Resin Composite (In-vitro Study). EKB Journal Management System, 2023; 69(3): 2437-2445. doi: 10.21608/edj.2023.210354.2545

Surface Roughness of Bis-GMA Free Resin Composite in Comparison With Bis-GMA Containing Resin Composite (In-vitro Study)

Egyptian Dental Journal
Volume 69, Issue 3 - Serial Number 5, July 2023, Page 2437-2445  XML PDF (435.4 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2023.210354.2545
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Menna Allah yousryorcid 1; Mohamed Mostafa Zayedorcid 2; Nermin Alsayed Mahmoud email orcid 3
1MSc Student, Msc Student, Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Minia University
2Associate Professor, Conservative Dentistry Faculty of Dentistry.sinai University Kantara Branch, Cairo, Egypt
3Lecturer Of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Minia University
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the Surface Roughness of Bis-GMA Free Resin Composite and Bis-GMA Containing Resin Composite.
Material and Methods: Two resin composites were assessed, Bis-GMA free composite (Admira Fusion) and Bis-GMA containing composite (Grandio). A total of 80 resin composite specimens were prepared in a Teflon mold (10 mm x 2 mm), categorized into two groups of (40 specimens) each was tested based on the type of resin composite, each group was categorized into 4 subgroups based on tested immersion solutions (n=10). Immersion solution used were artificial saliva, Coffee, Coca-Cola, and Tea. Readings of surface roughness (Ra) was obtained by profilometer after 24 hours, 2 weeks and one month of exposure to respective solutions.
Results: In terms of statistical significance, there was no difference between Bis-GMA Free Resin Composite and Bis-GMA Containing Resin Composite. Specimens immersed in cola showed the highest mean value of surface roughness among the different tested solutions.
Conclusion: Both tested types of resin composite have similar surface roughness behavior. All tested storage solutions caused surface roughness except artificial saliva. Cola caused marked surface roughness in both resin composites. Surface roughness was time-dependent, increasing with the passage of time.
Keywords
Surface Roughness; Admira Fusion; Grandio
Statistics
Article View: 169
PDF Download: 141