Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Polymeric and Conventional Concrete for Sustainable Construction: A Case Study of a New Clinic at Assiut University Hospital in Egypt. | ||||
| JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences | ||||
| Article 5, Volume 51, Issue 6, November and December 2023, Page 449-467 PDF (1.53 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/jesaun.2023.214792.1235 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Author | ||||
Ahmed AbdelMonteleb Mohammed Ali  
| ||||
| Associate Professor, Department of Architectural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Assiut University, Assiut, 71515, Egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| The building material industry has the largest share in global environmental emissions. In this study, the life cycle assessment (LCA) of polymeric concrete has been conducted and compared to conventional concrete to evaluate its environmental impact and identify areas for improvement for the construction of a new clinic at Assiut University Hospital in Egypt. The LCA was conducted (using SimaPro V9.5) from cradle to gate, including raw material extraction, transportation, and production. The LCA results showed that polymeric concrete had a lower environmental impact than conventional concrete regarding global warming, acidification, and eutrophication potential. In terms of the single score outcomes, climate change had a significant impact on both ordinary and polymer concrete, with the former scoring 0.90 mPt and the latter recording a much lower 0.14 mPt, indicating a 75% reduction. Furthermore, when considering the weighting results (midpoint result), it was found that specific environmental impacts, such as global warming, respiratory inorganic, and non-renewable energy impacts, had a more significant effect overall. Specifically, the global warming potential was found to be 8.95 Kg CO_2 eq. and 1.38 Kg CO_2 eq. for polymer and ordinary concrete, respectively. Lastly, the endpoint result showed that human health was impacted the most, with a total reduction of 84.24%. The DALY recorded for ordinary concrete was 3.69E-06, whereas, for polymer concrete, it was 5.8E-07. The findings of this study suggest that polymeric concrete can be a more sustainable alternative to conventional concrete for specific applications. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Life cycle assessment; Green building materials; Conventional concrete; Environmental impact; Assiut University Hospital Clinic | ||||
| References | ||||
|
[1] “Home - Egyptian Cement.” https://www.egyptian-cement.com/# (accessed May 31, 2023).
[2] B. Huang, F. Zhao, T. Fishman, W. Q. Chen, N. Heeren, and E. G. Hertwich, “Building Material Use and Associated Environmental Impacts in China 2000-2015,” Environ Sci Technol, vol. 52, no. 23, pp. 14006–14014, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1021/ACS.EST.8B04104/SUPPL_FILE/ES8B04104_SI_004.XLSX.
[3] M. Manjunatha, B. Kvgd, J. Vengala, L. R. Manjunatha, K. Shankara, and C. Kumar Patnaikuni, “Experimental study on the use of human hair as fiber to enhance the performance of concrete: A novel use to reduce the disposal challenges,” Mater Today Proc, vol. 47, pp. 3966–3972, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.MATPR.2021.04.039.
[4] R. B. Tangadagi, M. Manjunatha, S. Preethi, A. Bharath, and T. V. Reshma, “Strength characteristics of concrete using coconut shell as a coarse aggregate – A sustainable approach,” Mater Today Proc, vol. 47, pp. 3845–3851, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.MATPR.2021.03.265.
[5] B. L. N. S. Srinath, C. K. Patnaikuni, K. V. G. D. Balaji, B. S. Kumar, and M. Manjunatha, “A prospective review of alccofine as supplementary cementitious material,” Mater Today Proc, vol. 47, pp. 3953–3959, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.MATPR.2021.03.719.
[6] W. Lokuge and T. Aravinthan, “Effect of fly ash on the behaviour of polymer concrete with different types of resin,” Mater Des, vol. 51, pp. 175–181, Oct. 2013, doi: 10.1016/J.MATDES.2013.03.078.
[7] A. P. Gursel, H. Maryman, and C. Ostertag, “A life-cycle approach to environmental, mechanical, and durability properties of ‘green’ concrete mixes with rice husk ash,” J Clean Prod, vol. 112, pp. 823–836, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2015.06.029.
[8] D. K. Panesar, K. E. Seto, and C. J. Churchill, “Impact of the selection of functional unit on the life cycle assessment of green concrete,” International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 1969–1986, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1007/S11367-017-1284-0/METRICS.
[9] K. H. Yang, J. K. Song, and K. Il Song, “Assessment of CO2 reduction of alkali-activated concrete,” J Clean Prod, vol. 39, pp. 265–272, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2012.08.001.
[10] L. K. Turner and F. G. Collins, “Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: A comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete,” Constr Build Mater, vol. 43, pp. 125–130, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2013.01.023.
[11] A. Garbacz and J. J. Sokołowska, “Concrete-like polymer composites with fly ashes – Comparative study,” Constr Build Mater, vol. 38, pp. 689–699, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2012.08.052.
[12] W. Ferdous et al., “Optimal design for epoxy polymer concrete based on mechanical properties and durability aspects,” Constr Build Mater, vol. 232, p. 117229, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2019.117229.
[13] G. Asadollahfardi, A. Katebi, P. Taherian, and A. Panahandeh, “Environmental life cycle assessment of concrete with different mixed designs,” https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1579015, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 665–676, 2019, doi: 10.1080/15623599.2019.1579015.
[14] C. K. Chau, T. M. Leung, and W. Y. Ng, “A review on life cycle assessment, life cycle energy assessment and life cycle carbon emissions assessment on buildings,” Appl Energy, vol. 143, no. 1, pp. 395–413, 2015, doi: 10.1016/J.APENERGY.2015.01.023.
[15] D. N. Huntzinger and T. D. Eatmon, “A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing: comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies,” J Clean Prod, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 668–675, May 2009, doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2008.04.007.
[16] Z. Cao et al., “Toward a better practice for estimating the CO2 emission factors of cement production: An experience from China,” J Clean Prod, vol. 139, pp. 527–539, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.08.070.
[17] M. C. G. Juenger and R. Siddique, “Recent advances in understanding the role of supplementary cementitious materials in concrete,” Cem Concr Res, vol. 78, pp. 71–80, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2015.03.018.
[18] J. Aldred and J. Day, “IS GEOPOLYMER CONCRETE A SUITABLE ALTERNATIVE TO TRADITIONAL CONCRETE?” in 37th Conference on Our World in Concrete & Structures, Singapore, 2012, pp. 29–31.
[19] D. A. Salas, A. D. Ramirez, N. Ulloa, H. Baykara, and A. J. Boero, “Life cycle assessment of geopolymer concrete,” Constr Build Mater, vol. 190, pp. 170–177, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2018.09.123.
[20] M. M. Farid, A. M. Khudhair, S. A. K. Razack, and S. Al-Hallaj, “A review on phase change energy storage: materials and applications,” Energy Convers Manag, vol. 45, no. 9–10, pp. 1597–1615, Jun. 2004, doi: 10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2003.09.015.
[21] P. Duxson, J. L. Provis, G. C. Lukey, and J. S. J. van Deventer, “The role of inorganic polymer technology in the development of ‘green concrete,’” Cem Concr Res, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 1590–1597, Dec. 2007, doi: 10.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2007.08.018.
[22] E. Crossin, “The greenhouse gas implications of using ground granulated blast furnace slag as a cement substitute,” J Clean Prod, vol. 95, pp. 101–108, May 2015, doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2015.02.082.
[23] M. Manjunatha, S. Preethi, Malingaraya, H. G. Mounika, K. N. Niveditha, and Ravi, “Life cycle assessment (LCA) of concrete prepared with sustainable cement-based materials,” Mater Today Proc, vol. 47, pp. 3637–3644, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.MATPR.2021.01.248.
[24] M. Manjunatha, D. Seth, B. KVGD, and B. A, “Engineering properties and environmental impact assessment of green concrete prepared with PVC waste powder: A step towards sustainable approach,” Case Studies in Construction Materials, vol. 17, p. e01404, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.CSCM.2022.E01404.
[25] W. Chen, J. Hong, and C. Xu, “Pollutants generated by cement production in China, their impacts, and the potential for environmental improvement,” J Clean Prod, vol. 103, pp. 61–69, 2015, doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2014.04.048.
[26] A. A. M. Ali, “Environmental Impacts Assessment of Rice Straw Brick as a Substitutional Sustainable Building Material in Assiut University Hospital Clinic,” Journal of Advanced Engineering Trends, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 247–259, 2022, Accessed: May 26, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://jaet.journals.ekb.eg
[27] S. Seyis, “Mixed method review for integrating building information modeling and life-cycle assessments,” Build Environ, vol. 173, no. January, p. 106703, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106703.
[28] S. Su, Q. Wang, L. Han, J. Hong, and Z. Liu, “BIM-DLCA: An integrated dynamic environmental impact assessment model for buildings,” Build Environ, vol. 183, no. May, p. 107218, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107218.
[29] International Organization For Standardization (ISO), “ISO - ISO 14040:2006 - Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Principles and framework,” 2006. https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html (accessed Sep. 04, 2020).
[30] International Organization For Standardization (ISO), “ISO - ISO 14041:1998 - Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Goal and scope definition and inventory analysis,” 1998. https://www.iso.org/standard/23152.html (accessed Sep. 04, 2020).
[31] International Organization For Standardization (ISO), “ISO - ISO 14042:2000 - Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Life cycle impact assessment,” 2000. https://www.iso.org/standard/23153.html (accessed Sep. 04, 2020).
[32] International Organization For Standardization (ISO), “ISO - ISO 14043:2000 - Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Life cycle interpretation,” 2000. https://www.iso.org/standard/23154.html (accessed Sep. 04, 2020).
[33] A. A. M. Ali, “Application of comparative life cycle assessment to a proposed building for reduced environmental impacts: Assiut University Hospital Clinic as a case study,” Journal of Architecture, Arts and Humanities Sciences, vol. 7, no. 31, 2021, doi: 10.21608/mjaf.2020.41904.1847.
[34] A. Martínez-Rocamora, J. Solís-Guzmán, and M. Marrero, “LCA databases focused on construction materials: A review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 58, pp. 565–573, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.243.
[35] Ecoinvent Centre, “Ecoinvent data v3.2,” Switzerland.: Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, 2016. http://www.ecoinvent.org/home.html (accessed Mar. 28, 2016).
[36] C. Ingrao, A. Messineo, R. Beltramo, T. Yigitcanlar, and G. Ioppolo, “How can life cycle thinking support sustainability of buildings? Investigating life cycle assessment applications for energy efficiency and environmental performance,” J Clean Prod, vol. 201, pp. 556–569, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.080.
[37] M. U. Hossain and S. Thomas Ng, “Influence of waste materials on buildings’ life cycle environmental impacts: Adopting resource recovery principle,” Resour Conserv Recycl, vol. 142, no. October 2018, pp. 10–23, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.11.010.
[38] A. A. M. M. Ali, A. M. Negm, M. F. Bady, M. G. E. Ibrahim, and M. Suzuki, “Environmental impact assessment of the Egyptian cement industry based on a life-cycle assessment approach: a comparative study between Egyptian and Swiss plants,” Clean Technol Environ Policy, vol. 18, no. 4, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10098-016-1096-0.
[39] S. G. Al-Ghamdi and M. M. Bilec, “Green Building Rating Systems and Whole-Building Life Cycle Assessment: Comparative Study of the Existing Assessment Tools,” Journal of Architectural Engineering, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2017, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000222.
[40] X. Bengoa and M. Margni, “IMPACT 2002 + : User Guide,” 2012.
[41] J. Smith, “Environment directorate working party on global and structural policies working party on development co-operation and environment development and climate change in egypt: focus on coastal resources,” 2004.
[42] C. Shi, a. F. Jiménez, and A. Palomo, “New cements for the 21st century: The pursuit of an alternative to Portland cement,” Cem Concr Res, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 750–763, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.016.
[43] ASEC, “ASEC Cement: Annual Report 2013,” 2013.
[44] M. L. Marceau, M. a Nisbet, and M. G. VanGeem, “Life cycle inventory of Portland cement concrete,” no. 3007, 2007.
[45] H. Alhazmi, S. A. R. Shah, M. K. Anwar, A. Raza, M. K. Ullah, and F. Iqbal, “Utilization of Polymer Concrete Composites for a Circular Economy: A Comparative Review for Assessment of Recycling and Waste Utilization,” Polymers 2021, Vol. 13, Page 2135, vol. 13, no. 13, p. 2135, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.3390/POLYM13132135.
[46] B. Dastjerdi, V. Strezov, M. A. Rajaeifar, R. Kumar, and M. Behnia, “Waste to Energy Technologies,” Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences, 2022, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-90386-8.00012-7.
[47] X. Li, Y. Zhu, and Z. Zhang, “An LCA-based environmental impact assessment model for construction processes,” Build Environ, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 766–775, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.1016/J.BUILDENV.2009.08.010.
[48] S. Shi et al., “Life cycle assessment of embodied human health effects of building materials in China,” J Clean Prod, vol. 350, p. 131484, May 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2022.131484.
[49] G. Hu et al., “Human health risk-based life cycle assessment of drinking water treatment for heavy metal(loids) removal,” J Clean Prod, vol. 267, p. 121980, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.121980.
| ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 281 PDF Download: 787 |
||||
