Data Extraction Method for Better Failure Time Prediction of Landslides | ||||
| International Journal of Advances in Structural and Geotechnical Engineering | ||||
| Volume 07, Issue 01, February 2023, Page 1-10 PDF (858 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/asge.2023.218446.1054 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Imaya Ariyarathna  1; Katsuo Sasahara2
| ||||
| 1Life Environment Conservation Science, Ehime University, Japan | ||||
| 2Research and Education Faculty, Kochi University, Japan | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Time prediction methods based on monitoring surface displacement (SD) are effective for early warning against shallow landslides. However, failure time prediction by Fukuzono’s original inverse-velocity (INV) method is less accurate due to variation in the inverse-velocity (1/v) caused by noise in the measured SD, which amplifies the fluctuation in the resultant 1/v. Therefore, the present study incorporates pre-analysis to acquire better prediction by reducing the effect of noise on the measured SD. The data extraction (DE) and moving average (MA) methods are used to filter the measured SD for better smoothing of 1/v. The reproducibility of the measured SD and the scattering are assessed using the root mean square error (RMSE) and determining factor (f), respectively, to select the optimum SD interval (∆x) for data extraction in the DE method. The data, treated by the DE and MA methods, are utilized to predict the failure time based on the INV method and the relationship between velocity and acceleration on a logarithmic scale (VAA) method. Accordingly, ∆x gives the smallest sum of the normalized RMSE and normalized (1-f), which offers a better prediction. When the SD at failure changes, ∆x is changed. The best prediction is obtained by DE preprocessing with the VAA method because it minimizes the effect of the individual 1/v by reducing the scatter in the relationship between velocity and acceleration. However, the time prediction using data processed by the MA method shows poor prediction due to some scattering of the inverse velocity. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Shallow landslide; Failure time prediction; Model slope; Monitoring surface displacement | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 95 PDF Download: 113 |
||||
