Free-hand Versus Fully guided Monoblock Implant Placement In Full Mouth Rehabilitation Of Edentulous Maxillary Arches: A One-Year Clinical Study | ||||
| Egyptian Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | ||||
| Volume 14, Issue 1, January 2023, Page 29-41 PDF (2.02 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/OMX.2023.217407.1193 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Mostafa Ahmed* ; Mai Ahmed | ||||
| B.D.S., M.Sc., Ph.D. (A. Professor of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Oral & Dental Medicine, Cairo University) | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Objectives: Single-piece Monoblock implants promote the utilization of slightly-aggressive surgical maneuvers to restore edentulous spans with the least postoperative pain accompanied by a tremendous implant success rate. Moreover, the monoblock implants could be utilized in cases of several component restorations through Immediately or Progressively- loaded maxillary and/ or mandibular arches. Purpose of the study: to compare, clinically and radiographically between free-hand and fully-guided placement of monoblock implants in total full mouth rehabilitation of edentulous maxillary arches. Materials & methods: 16 completely edentulous cases were included based on certain inclusion criteria. Conventional dentures were constructed for all patients followed by, a cone beam radiograph, Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group (A) is the Free-hand implant placement group and Group (Ba is the ): fully-guided implant placement group. In both groups, 8 monoblock implants were placed in the central incisor region, canine region, second premolar & first molar region bilaterally. Clinical assessment included: prosthetic fitness, prosthetic maintenance, and prosthesis comfort while radiographic assessment included bone density and bone height measurements. Assessments were carried out 3, 6, 9 & 12 months after implant placement. Patient satisfaction was assisted utilizing a three-point scale patient satisfaction questionnaire. Results: Regarding Patient satisfaction: a non-significant difference was observed between both groups, on the same line, Regarding bone healing around implants: a non-significant difference was revealed. Conclusion: Within the limitation of this study, regarding the relatively small sample size, it could be concluded that the clinical and radiographic outcomes revealed that, a non-significant difference was observed between both groups, throughout the whole study period. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Monoblock implants; Edentulous Maxilla; Prosthetic maintenance; Patient satisfaction; Progressive Loading | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 55 PDF Download: 104 |
||||
