Multidrug Resistance in Gram Negative Bacteria Isolated from Cases of Mastitis in Buffaloes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Egyptian Journal of Animal Health | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Volume 3, Issue 3, July 2023, Page 169-183 PDF (1.46 MB) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Document Type: Original researches | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOI: 10.21608/ejah.2023.311930 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In Egypt, buffaloes are considered as the second largest source of milk. Mastitis is a prime hindrance for milk production with severs economic losses, but scarce data are available about subclinical type in Egyptian buffaloes. The target of this study was to (a) Estimation of some biochemical alteration in mastitic whey milk and its role in milk quality and quantity. Mastitis caused an increase in total whey protein, immunoglobulin and albumin in cows' milk samples with sub clinical mastitis, while α–lactalbumin, and β-lactoglobulin showed significant decreased. There was a highly significant decrease in α -casein and қ casein in sub clinical mastitic samples in comparing with the normal milk. In addition, there were a significant decrease in β-casein and non-significant decrease in γ casein milk protein fractions in sub clinical mastitic milk. (b) investigate the major gram-negative bacteria linked with buffalo’s mastitis, and (c) assess the antibiotic resistance pattern of the bacteria. To this end, 208 quarter milk samples were collected from 62 domesticated dairy buffaloes suffered from subclinical mastitis. Bacteriological assessment and biochemical methods, illustrated a total of 51 isolates (24.52%) represented different 10 Gram negative bacterial species. The most predominant ones were Klebsiella pneumoniae (25.49%), followed by Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis (13.73%) for each. The phenotypic antibiogram revealed that 50.9% of the isolated pathogens were resistant to three or more antibiotic groups. The most noticed resistance was versus ampicillin 43(84.31%) followed by both, tetracycline and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole 41(80.39%) for each one. Contrarily, the bacterial isolates were greatly sensitive to norfloxacin (68.6%), enrofloxacin (64.7%), then ciprofloxacin and amikacin (58.8%). On the other hand, the uniplex PCR, illustrated that 100% of the tested 13 Klebsiella pneumoniae strains carried bla ctx-m gene while 84.6% and 76.9% were positive to aacC and tet genes respectively., The implementation of high resistant associated Gram negative bacteria especially ESBL K. pneumoniae in subclinical mastitis considered a potential public health concern and requires good monitoring for achieving the efficient therapy. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Keywords | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buffalo mastitis; Gram negative bacteria; multidrug Klebsiella pneumonia; β lactamase; whey-proteins; Electrophoresis; α–lactalbumin; β-lactoglobulin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full Text | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Multidrug Resistance in Gram Negative Bacteria Isolated from Cases of Mastitis in Buffaloes
Saad S. N. Mansour1, Wessam Youssef 2 , Yasser Hana5, Randa S. Elias1, Hanan E. Nagib1 Ashraf S. Hakim3 Eman M Younis4 and Amany N. Dapgh5 1Buffalo Diseases Department, Animal Health Research Institute (AHRI), Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Nadi El-Seid Street, Dokki, P.O. Box 246, Giza 12618, Egypt 2Department of Biotechnology , Animal Health Research Institute (AHRI), Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Nadi El-Seid Street, Dokki, P.O. Box 246, Giza 12618, Egypt 3Microbiology and Immunology Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Egypt 4 Biochemistry, Toxicology and Feed Deficiency Department, Animal Health Research Institute (AHRI), Agricultural Research Centre (ARC), Dokki Giza, Egypt. 5Department of Bacteriology , Animal Health Research Institute (AHRI), Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Nadi El-Seid Street, Dokki, P.O. Box 246, Giza 12618, Egypt.
Abstract In Egypt, buffaloes are considered as the second largest source of milk. Mastitis is a prime hindrance for milk production with severs economic losses, but scarce data are available about subclinical type in Egyptian buffaloes. The target of this study was to (a) Estimation of some biochemical alteration in mastitic whey milk and its role in milk quality and quantity. Mastitis caused an increase in total whey protein, immunoglobulin and albumin in cows' milk samples with sub clinical mastitis, while α–lactalbumin, and β-lactoglobulin showed significant decreased. There was a highly significant decrease in α -casein and қ casein in sub clinical mastitic samples in comparing with the normal milk. In addition, there were a significant decrease in β-casein and non-significant decrease in γ casein milk protein fractions in sub clinical mastitic milk. (b) investigate the major gram-negative bacteria linked with buffalo’s mastitis, and (c) assess the antibiotic resistance pattern of the bacteria. To this end, 208 quarter milk samples were collected from 62 domesticated dairy buffaloes suffered from subclinical mastitis. Bacteriological assessment and biochemical methods, illustrated a total of 51 isolates (24.52%) represented different 10 Gram negative bacterial species. The most predominant ones were Klebsiella pneumoniae (25.49%), followed by Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis (13.73%) for each. The phenotypic antibiogram revealed that 50.9% of the isolated pathogens were resistant to three or more antibiotic groups. The most noticed resistance was versus ampicillin 43(84.31%) followed by both, tetracycline and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole 41(80.39%) for each one. Contrarily, the bacterial isolates were greatly sensitive to norfloxacin (68.6%), enrofloxacin (64.7%), then ciprofloxacin and amikacin (58.8%). On the other hand, the uniplex PCR, illustrated that 100% of the tested 13 Klebsiella pneumoniae strains carried bla ctx-m gene while 84.6% and 76.9% were positive to aacC and tet genes respectively., The implementation of high resistant associated Gram negative bacteria especially ESBL K. pneumoniae in subclinical mastitis considered a potential public health concern and requires good monitoring for achieving the efficient therapy. Key words: Buffalo mastitis, Gram negative bacteria, multidrug Klebsiella pneumonia, β lactamase, whey-proteins, Electrophoresis, α–lactalbumin, β-lactoglobulin.
INTRODUCTION In low to middle income countries, milk and dairy products comprise the major protein source for much of the population. Buffaloes contribute to a predominately large proportion of the total milk production worldwide (13 %) (FAO 2019). In Egypt, buffalo achieves 47 % of the total livestock population compared to cattle and also considered one of the important countries that buffalo’s milk is highly output and consumed due to its high fat content, color and flavor (Arefaine and Kashwa, 2015). However, in spite of genetic upgrading and novel methods of livestock rearing, decreased productivity which in turn leads to a decrease in consumption (Ramesh and Divya 2014). Subclinical mastitis is one of the most prevalent economic issues of dairy industry globally. It is mostly caused by bacteria, and the infection implemented in inflammation and pathophysiological alterations in the udder tissue, leading to compromised milk quality and reducing the produced quantities (Viguier et al. 2009). Gram negative bacteria constitute important sets of bacteria. Some species are commensals and others are important human and animal’s pathogen. Gram negative bacterial mastitogens are mostly environmental pathogens, as Klebsiella pneumonia, Escherichia coli and Citrobacter spp. (Klaas and Zadoks 2018). Milk is an important part of the diet of human beings. It contains a wide range of dietary components of vital importance like water, proteins, lactose, minerals and vitamins. The exact composition of milk varies with the breed, species, feeding regimes, The identification of sub clinically mastitic causing pathogens and their antimicrobial sensitivity testing are important points in the implementation of control programs (Dhakal et al., 2007). Detection and evaluation of proteins in milk during the course of mastitis are important to elucidate the pathologic mechanism of bovine mastitis (Kato et al., 1989). Electrophoresis has played an important role in the study of milk proteins and has been an integral part of research on the genetic variants of the major proteins components of milk. Indeed, the designations of caseins are derived from electrophoretic analysis and minor caseins components were discovered by electrophoresis (Kostyra, 1990). Bovine milk contains 3.0-3.53 % (w/v) protein (Cole, 1986). Caseins are 2.4-2.79% of fluid milk and exist in milk as a micelle containing the four casein types: αs1- αs2- ß and k-casein (Kostyra, 1990). Whey proteins are serum albumin, α-lactalbumin, ß Lactoglobulin, and immunoglobulin In Egypt, it seems to be high prevalence of resistance against antimicrobial agents among different Gram negative bacteria due to uncontrolled widespread use of antibiotics in veterinary practice and the potential public health concern due to antibiotic residues (Ameen et al. 2019). Most of the mastitis researches have been performed in cows; but recently, reports indicated that dairy buffaloes are also affected with parallel frequency (Ali et al. 2011). So, the prime aim of this study concerned with survey of common Gram negative bacterial causative agents implemented in mastitic buffaloes in Giza in addition to assessment of multidrug resistance pattern.
Materials and Method: Sampling A total of 208 quarter milk samples were gathered under aseptic conditions from 62 subclinical mastitic dairy buffaloes from organized farms (76 samples) and small holder (132 samples) in Giza governorate during 2021-2022. Before taking the samples, the teat was disinfected after washing and dryness of the udder. Nearly fifteen ml of the foremilk was thrown away and the next fifteen ml gathered into sterile screw-capped bottles and transported to the laboratory in ice box and stored at 4°C till examination. Sample preparation for electrophoresis: Fresh warm raw milk was obtained from Holstein cows. Within an hour after milking, milk samples were skimmed by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 15 min to remove their creams and cells. Samples were then treated with 0.1 M, hydrochloric acid at the controlled PH of 4.8 for casein precipitation. Treated samples were recentrifuged and the supernatants (Whey) were collected. The casein precipitate was separated from the whey by filtration. The casein fraction was washed with distilled water three times, maintaining the PH of the water at 4.7 by addition of dilute HCl. Casein solution was prepared by dissolving 1g casein in 100 ml of 100 mM Tris-Hcl buffer (PH 8.0) and heating in a boiling bath for 20 min. The solution was filtrated without cooling and stored at 4 °C until to be used. Casein solutions must be discarded after 2 days. The total whey protein was determined according to Henry, (1969), application of SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis according to Sambrook, et al. (1989). The protein standard is ranged from (10-250KDa) BioRad, using methods of Sambrook, et al. (1989 Bacteriological examination: All samples were centrifuged for fifteen minutes at 3000 rpm and a loopful was taken from the sediment and inoculated onto MacConkey's agar plates and incubated at 37°C for 24 then 48 hr. The growing surface colonies were identified by morphological appearance as well as traditional biochemical tests; oxidase, catalase, indole, methyl red, Voges–Proskauer, citrate utilization, urease, H2S production on TSI, nitrate reduction and motility tests (Quinn et al. 2011). Moreover, the bacterial isolates were confirmed biochemically using the VITEK-2 compact identification system (BioMerieux, France), following to manufacturer’s instruction using Gram –ve cards (Ling et al. 2003). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing: The antibiogram profile of the isolates was analyzed, via disk diffusion method using 12 antimicrobials from six various groups as follows: (i) aminoglycosides (amikacin 30 µg, gentamicin 10 µg), (ii) Beta-lactams and derivatives (ampicillin 10 µg, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 30 µg) (iii) cephalosporins (ceftiofur 30 µg, ceftriaxone 30 µg, cephalexin 30 µg), (iv) fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin 5 µg, enrofloxacin 5 µg, norfloxacin 10 µg), (v) sulfonamides (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 25 µg), and (vi) tetracyclines (tetracycline 30 µg). The disks were purchased from TM Media, (Titan Biotech Ltd India).The sensitivity/resistance was relied on the zone of inhibition diameter, following the guidelines of the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI 2020). Isolates that displayed simultaneous resistance to ≥ 3 various groups of antimicrobials were looked multi-resistant (Rafailidis and Kofteridis 2022).
Bacterial DNA extraction for PCR: Two hundred microliters were obtained from the thirteen K. pneumoniae’s overnight cultures, mixed with eight hundreds microliters of distilled water and boiled for ten minutes. The resulting solution was centrifuged and the supernatant used as the DNA template. DNA extraction from samples was carried out using the QIAamp DNA Mini kit (Qiagen, Germany, GmbH) with modifications from the manufacturer’s guidelines. The DNA extracts were subjected to uniplex PCR using primers specific for detection of aacC, bla ctx-m and tet genes which responsible for resistance against aminoglycoside, ESBL (β- lactmase) and tetracycline respectively. The primers sequences, and cycle conditions listed in Table (1). Amplification was performed using an applied biosystem 2720 thermal cycler. Following PCR performance, the reaction products were subjected to electrophoresis in a 1.0% (w/v) agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under UV light.
Table (1) The primers sequences, and cycle conditions
Results In the current study, a total of 51 (24.52%) Gram-negative bacterial isolates were obtained from 208 quarter mastitic buffalo’s milk samples in Giza, Egypt, Based on cultural colonial morphology and conventional biochemical tests; the bacteria isolated were belonging to Klebsiella spp. (16 isolates), Proteus spp. (9 isolates), Escherichia coli (7 isolates), Enterobacter spp. (7 isolates), Pseudomonas spp. (5 isolates), Citrobacter spp. (5 isolates), and Aeromonas spp. (2 isolates). Further advanced biochemical typing illustrated more species identification as shown in table (2).
Table (2): Comparison between traditional and Vitek2 compact identification of bacterial isolates (n≈ 51).
The detailed data obtained from in-vitro susceptibility assays were represented in tables 3 (a) and (b); a high percentage of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates were resistant to ampicillin (92.3%) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (76.9%), while 69.2% of them were resistant to gentamicin and tetracycline. On the other hand, most of the Gram negative isolates were less resistant to norfloxacin (31.4%), enrofloxacin (35.3%), ciprofloxacin and a mikacin (41.2%).
Table 3 (a): detailed antibiotic resistance profiles of bacterial isolates.
% calculated according to No. of isolates for each species.
Table 3 (b): detailed antibiotic resistance profiles of bacterial isolates
% calculated according to No. of isolates for each species.
Moreover, the antibiotic susceptibility test showed that 26 out of 51 isolates (50.9%) exposed phenotypic multiple resistance to 3 or more antibiotic groups. The most multidrug-resistant species was K. pneumoniae (8 isolates; 61.5%) as shown in figure 1. On the other sight, the most noticed resistance to antibiotic types was against ampicillin 43(84.3%) followed by both, tetracycline and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole 41(80.39%) for each one.
Table 4(a): Protein electrophoretic pattern of normal and sub-clinical mastitic whey milk
Table 4 (b): Protein electrophoretic pattern of normal and sub-clinical mastitic whey milk
The detailed data of Protein electrophoretic pattern of normal and sub-clinical mastitic way milk were represented in table 4 (a) showed a significant increase in total fraction of protein of sub clinical mastitic milk comparing with normal milk, while four casein types: α, ß, k and γ casein of sub cilincal mastitc milk were significantly decreased.
Figure 1: the percentage pattern of Gram negative isolates multidrug resistance
Figure 2: the percentage pattern of antibiotic resistance. According to the results shown in figures (3-5); the uniplex PCR identified aacC, bla ctx-m and tet genes in 11, 13 and 10 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates (84.6, 100 and 76.9%) respectively.
Figure 3: uniplex polymerase chain reaction showing positive amplification of 448bp represented aacC gene in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. L: 100 bp DNA ladder.
Figure 4: uniplex polymerase chain reaction showing positive amplification of 545bp represented bla ctx-m gene in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. L: 100 bp DNA ladder.
Figure 5: uniplex polymerase chain reaction showing positive amplification of 293bp represented tet gene in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. L: 100 bp DNA ladder.
DISCUSSION Every time, mastitis is considered one of the most fundamental illnesses affecting the dairy industry, causing great economic losses in Egypt and worldwide (Azooz et al. 2020). Dairy farmers broadly use antibiotic remedy as an important tool to hinder the intra-mammary infection, particularly before calving. Also antibiotics are used to cure persistent udder infections (Rowe et al. 2021). Excessive use of antimicrobial agents in dairy farms leading to emerging resistance among different bacterial pathogens, and result in a major public health concern (Olivares-Pérez et al. 2015). Concerning the data obtained from bacteriological examination (table 2) revealed that out of 208 cultured samples from mastitic buffaloes, a total of 51 Gram negative bacterial isolates were recovered (24.52%). Our result near with that reported by Sayed et al. (2011) as (33.7%) but much less than that reported by Kabir et al. (2019) in which the contribution of Gram-negative bacteria was 68%. In contrast our results were much more than study performed by Bhutia et al. (2019) as (3.2%). The most frequent isolates recovered were Klebsiella pneumonia (13, 25.5%), followed by E. coli and Proteus mirabilis (7, 13.7%), Enterobacter cloacae, Citrobacter freundii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (5, 9.8%), Klebsiella oxytoca (3, 5.8%), and lastly Proteus vulgaris, Enterobacter aerogenes and Aeromonas hydrophila (3, 3.9%). Regarding both Klebsiella and Escherichia coli; our results were nearly coincided with previous studies (Sayed, 2014; Ahmed et al. 2016; Ahmed et al. 2018; Ameen et al. 2019) but much lower than that mentioned by Nehal, 2019 (33.9%). Cheng et al. (2019) mentioned that Klebsiella and Escherichia coli are considered from the major common bovine mastitis pathogens. The data obtained from tables 3 (a) and (b) revealed that Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates exposed high resistance pattern against ampicillin (92.3%) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (76.9%), while 69.2% of them were resistant to gentamicin and tetracycline. These results nearby Ribeiro et al. (2022), who reported high resistance pattern of the Klebsiella isolates was seen to ampicillin (91.8%), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (39.7%), and multidrug resistance to ≥ 3 classes of antimicrobials was existed in 20.4% isolates. Also, antibiogram results obtained by Marashifard et al. (2019) on E. coli isolated from bovine mastitis exposed that the highest rate of resistance was noticed versus tetracycline (18.6%), then trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (12.9%). Additionally, prevalence of resistance of Klebsiella spp. was high to amoxicillin/clavulanate (38%), followed by tetracycline (32%), further, a high proportion (27%) of isolates were multidrug resistant (Cheng et al. 2019).Osman et al. (2014) investigated ten K. pneumoniae isolates obtained from mastitic buffaloes in Egypt and reported a multidrug resistance pattern for 40% of the isolates.
Inflammation of the mammary gland leads to a variety of compositional changes in milk either because of local effects or because of serum components entering the milk and the movement of some normal milk components out of the alveolar lumen into the perivascular space (Harmon, 1994). As sowed in table 4 (a), Albumin content of milk in sub clinical mastitis was significantly elevated compared to the healthy ones these agree with Batavani et al., 2007 who reported the increase of albumin content during mastitis in cows. De Wit, 1998, said that the main site of albumin synthesis is in the liver, and the albumin enters the milk by leaking through the epithelial tight junction from the blood stream, while Shamay et al. (2005) found that the extra hepatic synthesis of albumin has been demonstrated in mammary gland epithelial cells, but in lesser amounts than the liver. The marked significantly increases of albumin in mastitic cow’s milk suggest that a major source of this elevation in the content of albumin in milk under inflammatory conditions is the mammary gland itself. Immunoglobulin in mammary secretions is serum- derived or produced in the udder and pass into the milk through the mammary epithelium. The concentrations of immunoglobulin in normal milk are low and depend on the degree of vascular permeability of the udder tissues (Henry et al., 2007). During inflammation this permeability barrier is broken, immunoglobulin concentrations increase in secretions from infected mammary glands. The increase in milk immunoglobulins may be effective in reducing severity of mastitis (Persson, 1992). The major function of immunoglobulins is opsonization of microorganisms for phagocytosis, and they are believed to prevent bacterial adherence to epithelial membranes, inhibit multiplication and neutralize toxins. The decrease in α –lactalbumin, β-lactoglobulin associated with the sub clinical mastitis agreed with results of previous investigations reported by (Ishikawa and Shimizu, 1982).This could be due to both inflammatory damage of the mammary secretary tissues and destruction of the blood milk permeability barriers which restrict and discriminate in transfer of protein from interstitial fluid into milk. Table 4 (b) showed that, The percentages of α casein, β casein, қ casein, and γ casein in mastitic samples were lower than those of healthy normal milk. This result may be explained by that milk from mastitic udders exhibits greatly increased proteolytic activity (Le Roux et al., 1995). Plasmin is the most important protease in milk from healthy udders but the non-plasmin proteases become more important with increasing severity of udder inflammation. This proteolysis leads to a decrease in the relative proportion of caseins (Henry et al., 2007). On the other hand, our results demonstrated that most of the Gram negative isolates were sensitive to norfloxacin (68.6%), enrofloxacin (64.7%), ciprofloxacin and amikacin (58.8%). Also, Ribeiro et al. (2022) mentioned that norfloxacin was the most efficient antimicrobial against Klebsiella isolates. Regarding the genes responsible for antibiotic resistance, our results revealed that Klebsiella isolates harbored aacC, bla ctx-m and tet genes with high proportional (84.6, 100 and 76.9%), respectively. Particularly, the existence of bla ctx-m gene which is responsible for resistance against β lactams in the isolates constitutes a significant hazardous pattern to human representing what is termed extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) pathogens (Bandyopadhyay et al. 2018). The authors also detected twelve ESBL producing Klebsiella pneumoniae that carried blaCTX-M-15 gene with 63.2% among 19 buffaloes suffered from mastitis. On the other hand, the presence of aacC and tetA genes also potentially interfere with the mastitis therapy programs (Nobrega et al. 2021).
CONCLUSION Mastitis resides an illness causing great economic losses to the dairy industry, and the success of mastitis remedy is relied on the choice of proper antimicrobial therapies. Therefore, periodic monitoring of the antibiotic sensitivities of pathogenic bacteria isolated from dairy mastitic buffaloes, as well as molecular pattern of this resistance would be an essential tool in detecting emergence and spreading of antimicrobial resistance. High prevalence of resistance rate for antibiotics among Gram negative bacteria isolated from mastitic buffaloes may be indicating significant public health concern. Isolation of multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, a typical nosocomial pathogen from sub clinical mastitic buffalo milk, repeats the necessity to keep an eye on farm animals for ESBL producing Enterobacteriaceae and asserts on avoiding the indiscriminating usage or misuse of antibiotics in animal husbandry sector. Infected animals should be identified as rapid as possible as it is the potential source of infection to non-infected animals. Identification of the causative agent is an essential step in the application of antimicrobial therapy and herd management. Protein percent of milk serum whey protein, immunoglobulin, and albumin increased during subclinical mastitis. While α -casein, қ casein, and β-casein decreased in sub clinical mastitis. In subclinical mastitis, an increase in relative amount of γ-casein and a decrease in β-casein were noticed. On the other hand, the relative amount of immune globulins increased, but no changes were found in the remaining components of whey-proteins. In the obvious acute case, a relative increase in amount of γ-casein and flattening of theβ-casein peak were observed. Moreover, some abnormalities appeared in the α-casein peak. Of the changes in whey-proteins, the increase in relative amount of immune globulins and serum albumin.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
References | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abdel-Khalek, A. and El-Sherbini, M. (2005): Prevalence of contagious pathogeno of bovine subclinical mastitis and relationship to bacterial and somatic cell counts. 4th Int. Sci. Conf., Mansoura pp 1-10.
Anwer, W.; Mohga F. Badawi and Gehan Z. Moustafa (2003): Environmental micro-organisms causing mastitis in dairy cattle reared under different hygienic measures. J. Egypt. Vet. Med. Ass. 63 (1): 161-170.
Attia, E.R.H.; Amal, A. El Rashidy and Metias, K.N. (2003): Comparative study between electric conductivity, California mastitic test and somatic cell count for rapid diagnosis of subclinical mastitis in lactating cow. The 7th Sci. Cong Egyptian society cattle Diseases, PP. 25-29.
Auldist, M.J.; Coats, B.J.; Mayes, J. and McDowell, G.H. (1996): Effects of somatic cell count and stage of lactation on raw milk composition and the yield and quality of cheddar cheese. Dairy Res. 63: 269-280.
Batavani, R.A.; Asri, S. and Naebzadeh, H. (2007): The effect of sub clinical mastitis on milk composition in dairy cows. Iranian J. Vet. Res. 20: 205-211.
Bauer, A.W.; Kirby, M.M.; Sherris, J.C. and Turch, M. (1966):Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 45: 493-496
Bradley, A.J. and Green, M.J. (2001): Aetiology of clinical mastitis in six somerset dairy herdo. Vet. Rec.; 148 (22): 683-686.
Cole, E.H. (1986): Veterinary clinical pathology. 4th.Ed. Philadelphia, W.B.Saunders Co., 362.
Coulon, J.B.; Gasqui, P.; Barnouin, J. and Pomies, D. (2002): Effect of mastitis and related-germ on milk yield and composition during naturally–occurring udder infections in dairy cows. Anim. Res. 51: 383-393.
Cruikshank, R.; Duguid, J.P.; Mormoion, B.P. and Swaim, R.H.A. (1975): The practice of medical microbiology 12th Ed., Vol. Churchill livingstone London, U.K.
DeBoer, E. and Heuvelink, A.F. (2000): Method for the detection and isolation of shiga-toxin producing E-coli J. of Applied Microbiology Symposium Supplement, 88: 133-143.
De Wit, J.N. (1998): Nutritional and functional characteristics of whey proteins in food products. J Dairy Sci. 81: 597-608.
Dhakal, I.P. (1997): Drug selection and use on clinical mastitis in buffaloes at Chitwan Valley of Nepal. Bubalus bubalis, 11: 56-70.
Dhakal, I.P.; Dhakal, P.; Koshihara, T. and Nagahata, H. (2007): epidemiological and bacteriological survey of buffalo mastitis in Nepal. J. Vet. Med. Sci., 69 (12): 1241-1245.
Eberhart, R.J.; Harmon, R.J.; Jasper, D.E. and Spencer, S.B. (1987): Current concepts of bovine mastitis 3rd Ed. Natl. Mastitis Counc., Inc., Arlington, VA.
El-Balkemy, F.A.; Esmat, M.; Afaf Menazie and Azza N. Farag (1997): Evaluation of screening tests used for detection of subclinical mastitis. 4th Sci. Cong. Egyptian Society for cattle Disease, 7-9 Dec. Assiut, Egypt: 181-191.
El-Gamal, A.M. (1989): Studies on subdinical mastitis among dary farms. M.V.Sc. Thesis. Fac. of Vet. Med. Zagazig Univ.
El-Khodery, S.A. and Hoedemakes, M. (2005): Incidence and type of mastitis in the livestock of Nothern Germany concerning management factors. 4th Int. Sci. Conf., Mansoura, 5-6 April, 973-987.
El-Kholy, A.M. and Hosein, H.I. (1990): Studies on sub clinical mycotic mastitis in cows. Assiut Vet. Med J., 22 (44): 111-115.
Finegold, S.M. and Martin, W.J. (1982): Bailley and Scott's Diagnostic Microbiology. 6th Ed. C.V.Mosoly Co.St. Louis. Toronto, London
Fox, L.K.; Shook, G.E. and Schultz, L.H. (1985): Factors related to milk loss in quarters with low somatic cell counts. J. Dairy Sci 68: 2100-2107.
Harmon, R.J. (1994): Physiology of mastitis and factors affecting somatic cell counts. J Dairy Sci., 77: 2103-2112.
Hatem, M.E.; Saleh, S.M.; Shelaish, M.A.; Hafez, R.S. and Abozeid, A.A. (1984): Staphylococus aureus Subclinical mastitis in a machine-milked dairy head with reference to treatment with gentamycin Vet. Med. J., 32 (3): 171-179.
Hawari, A.D. and Al-Dabbas, F. (2008): Prevalence and distribution of mastitis pathogens and their resistance against antimicrobial agents in dairy cows in Jordan. American J. animal & Vet. Sci., 3 (1):36-39
Henry, H. (1969): Determination of total protein (Hawks clinical chemistry) Long Press.38-70.
Henry, O.; Anakalo, S. and Jackin, N. (2007): Effect of mastitis on raw milk compositional quality.J.Vet.Sci.3: 237-242.
Hodges, R.T.; Jones, Y.S. and Holland, J. T. S. (1984): Characterization of staphylocci associate with clinical and subclinical bovine mastitis. New Zealand Vet. J. 32 (9): 141-145.
Ibtisam, E.; Mohamed; G.E.; Mohamed, G.; Eaud El Own, O.A.O. (1993): A study on the incidence and etiology of bovine mastitis in sudan 2nd Sci. Cong. Egyptian Society for Cattle Diseases, 5-7 Dec. Assiut, Egypt, 326-332.
Ishikawa, H. and Shimizu, T. (1982): Protein composition of whey from subclinical mastitis and effect of treatment with levamisole. J. Dairy Sci. 65: 653-658.
Ismail, T.M. and Hatem, M.E. (1998): Prevalence of sub clinical mastitis in a dairy cottle herd in the eastern region of Saudi Arabia. Proc. 8th Sci. Cong., Fac. Vet. Med., Assiut Univ., Egypt.
Janosi, S. and Baltay, Z. (2004): Correlations among the somatic cell count of individual bulk milk, result of the California Mastitis test and bacteriological status of the uddes in dairy cows. Acta Vet. Hung. 52: 173-183.
Joshi, S.V.; Prasad, J. and Rekib, A. (1976): Studies on the field diagnosis of SCM. Indian Vet. J. 53 (10): 752-756.
Kader, M.A.; Samad, M.A.; Seha, S. and Taleb, M.A. (2002): Prevalence and etiology of subclinical mastitis with antibiotic sensitivity to isolated organism among Milch cows in Bangladesh. I. J. D. S., 55, 4: 218-223.
Kato K.; Mori K.; and Katoh N. (1989): Different protein patterns in normal and mastitic milks as revealed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Japans J. Vet. Sci 6:1275-1278.
Kitchen, B.J. (1981): Review of the progress of dairy science: Bovine mastitis: milk compositional changes and related diagnostic tests. J. Dairy Res., 48, 167-188.
Kostyra, E. (1990): Changes in protein fractions of milk obtained from cows with mastitis caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Preliminary studies. Rocz. Pantsw. Zakl. Hig., 41: 263-268.
Le Roux, Y.; Clin, O. and Laurent, F. (1995): Proteolysis in samples of quarter milk with varying somatic cell counts. 1. Comparison of some indicators of endogenous proteolysis in milk. J. Dairy Sci, 1289-1297.
Li, J.; Zhou, H.; Yuan, L.; He, T. and Hu, S. (2009): Prevalence, genetic diversity, and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis in Zhejiang Province, China. Journal of Zhejiang University 10(10): 753-760.
Makovec, J.A. and Ruegg, P.L. (2003): Results of Milk Samples Submitted for Microbiological Examination in Wisconsin from 1994 to 2001. J. Dairy Sci. 86: 3466–3472.
Malinowski, E.; Klassowska, A. and Szalbierz, M. (1992): Pathogenicity to the mommary gland of micro-organisms isolated from clinical and subclinical bovine mastitis. Medycyna-Veterynaryina. 18 (10): 467-469.
Miles, H.; Lesser, W. and Sears, P. (1992):The economic implications of bioengineered mastitis control. J Dairy Sci, 75: 596-605.
Mohamed, Ibtisam, E.; Mohamed, G.E. and El-Owni, O.A.O. (1993): A study on the incidence and etiology of bovine mastitis in Sudan. Proc. 2nd Sci. Cong. Egyptian society for Cattle Diseases, 5-7 Dec., Assiut. Egypt.
Nazem, A.M. and Azab, M.H. (1998): Detection of apparently normal milk by screening and confirmatory methods. Pro 8th Sci Cong., Assiut Univ., Egypt.
Nickerson, S.C. (1985): Immune mechanisms of the bovine udder: an overview. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 187: 41-45.
Oliver, S.P.; Gillespie, B.E.; Headrick, S.J.; Moorehead, A.; Lunn, P.; Dowlen, H.H.; Johnson, D.L.; Lamar, K.C.; Chester, S.T. and Moseley, W.M. (2004):Efficacy of extended ceftiofur intramammary therapy for treatment of subclinical mastitis in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 87(8): 2393-2400.
Persson, K. (1992): Studies on inflammation in the bovine teat with regard to its role in the defense against udder infections. Dissertation, Uppsala, Sweden, 11-17.
Phuektes, P.; Mansell, P.D.; Dyson, R.S.; Hooper, N.D.; Kick, J.S. and Browning, G.F. (2001): Molecular epidemiology of streptococcus uberis isolated from diary cows with mastitis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39 (4): 1460-1466.
Politis, I.; Barbano, D.M. and Gorewit, R.C. (1992): Distribution of plasminogen and plasmin in fractions of bovine milk. Journal of Dairy Science, 75: 1402-1410.
Quinn, P.J.; Carter, M.E.; Markey, Band Corter, G.R. (1994): Clinical veterinary Microbiology. Walfe publishing, an imprint of mosby-year book Europe limited.
Radostits, O.M.; Lesl, eK.E. and Fetrow, J. (1994): Hend Health Food Animal Production Medicine. 2nd Ed., Toronto: W. B. Saunders Company, 229-273.
Radostitis, O.M.; Gay, C.C.; Blood, D.C. and Hincheliff, K.W. (2000): Veterinary Medicine. 9th Edn., W. B. Sawndersco Ltd., London.
Sadek, O.A. (2008): Human health risks associated with consumption of milk from subclinical mastitic animals in Assiut governorate. Ph.D thesis, Fac. Vet. Med., Assiut Univ., Egypt.
Saini, S.S.; Sharma, J.K. and Kwatra, M.S. (1994): Prevalence and etiology of sub clinical mastitis among Gross-breed Cows and buffaloes in Punjab. Indian J. Dairy Sci., 47 (2): 103-106.
Sambrook, J.; Fritsch, E.F. and Maniatis, T. (1989): Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual, (second ed.), 18: 47-59.
Sargeant, J.M.; Lesile, K.E.; Shirley, J.E.; Pulkrabek, B.J. and Lim, G.H. (2001): Sensitivity and specificity of somatic cell ount and California Mastitis test for identifying intramammary infection in early lactation. J. Dairy Sci., 84: 2018-2024.
Scalm, O.W.; Crrolle, J. and Jain, N.C. (1971): Bovine mastitis. Lea and Febiger Philadelphia.
Schmitz, S.; Pfaffi, M.W.; Meyer, H.H.D. and Brukmaier, R.M. (2004): Short-term changes of mRNA expression of various inflammatory factors and milk proteins in mammary tissue during LPS-induced mastitis. Domestic Animal Endocrinology, 26: 111-126.
Schultz, L.H.; Brown, R.W.; Jasper, D.E.; Berger, R.W.M.; Natzke, R.P.; Philpot, W.N.; Smith, J.W. and Thomson, P.D. (1978): Current Concepts of Bovine Mastitis. 2nd Ed. The National Mastitis Council, Inc. Washington DC, USA. pp: 6-9.
Sexena, R.K.; Dutta, G.N.; Borah, P. and Buragohain, J. (1993): Incidence and etiology of bovine subclinical mastitis. Indian Vet. J., 70 (11): 1079-1080.
Shamay, A.; Homans, R.; Fuerman, Y.; Levin, I.; and Mabjeesh, S.J. (2005): Expression of albumin in non-hepatic tissues and its synthesis by the bovine mammary gland. J Dairy Sci., 88: 569-576.
Sharma, S.D. and Rai, P. (1977): Studies on the incidence of bovine mastitis in uttar pralesh II. Sub clinical mastitis. Indian Vet. J., 54 (6): 435-439.
Shitandi, A. and Kihumbu, G. (2004): Assessment of the California mastitis test usage in small holder dairy herds and risk of violative antimiaobila residues. J. Vet. Sci, 5: 5-9.
Thorberg, B.M.; Danielsson-Tham, M.L.; Emanuelson, U. and Persson Waller, K. (2009): Bovine subclinical mastitis caused by different types of coagulase-negative staphylocooci. J. Dairy Sci. 92: 4962-4970.
Tijare, D.B.; Singh, A.K.; Chaturvedi, V.K. and Dhanesas, N.S. (1999): Sensitivity of indirect tests in detection of subclinical mastitis in buffaloes. Indian Vet. J., 76 (10): 912-915.
Vanfurth, R. and Van Zwet, T. (1986): In vitro determination of phagocytosis and intra cellular killing by polymerphonucleas and mononuclear phagocytes. Incited from; Weir DM. and Herzenberg LA., Handbook of Experimental Immunology, Vol. 2, Cellular Immunology Black Scientific publications, Oxford, UK, PP. 36.1-36.24.
Weinbreek, F.; Nieuwenhuijse, H.; Robijn, G.W. and De Kruif, C.G. (2004): Complexation of whey proteins with carrageenan. J. Agric. Food Chem., 11: 3550-3555.
Wielgosz-Groth, Z. and Groth, I. (2003): Effect of the udder health on the composition and quality of quentes milk from block-and white cows. Electron. J. Pol. Agr. U. Anim. Husbandry, 6, Issue 2. http:// www. ejpau. media. pl/ seriesvolume6/ issue2/ animal (ast-olihtm). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistics Article View: 78 PDF Download: 48 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||