Flexor Digitorum Superficialis Tendon Injuries in Zone II: To Repair or Not | ||||
| The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery | ||||
| Article 11, Volume 47, Issue 4, October 2023, Page 319-325 PDF (2.77 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/ejprs.2023.319998 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Ahmed Gadallah   ; Adnan Gamal Etman ; Mohamed M Abelhalim
| ||||
| The Department of Plastic, Burn and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Background: Attaining favorable functional results after flexor tendon repair in zone II has always been a complex task. This is primarily due to the cramped positioning of the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) and the two slips of the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) within a narrow fibroosseous tunnel. Such a confined space significantly increases the risk of postoperative adhesions and consequent limitations in postoperative range of motion and strength. The primary objectives of tendon restoration revolve around enhancing tendon healing and minimizing adhesion formation. Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes after surgery by assessing postoperative range of motion (ROM) and radiological findings using Musculoskeletal Ultrasound (MSK US). Specifically, we aim to compare the results between cases where both the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) and flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) tendons are repaired in Zone II flexor tendon injuries, and cases where only the FDP tendon is repaired. Additionally, we will examine the formation of granulation tissue as a parameter in our evaluation. Patients and Methods: This interventional clinical trial involves a total of fifty individuals who have experienced flexor tendon injuries in zone II. The patients were selected from those who underwent surgery at El Dmerdash Hospital, based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria outlined in our study. A random sampling method was employed to divide the patients into two groups. Group I consist of twenty-five patients (the study group) who underwent repair of both the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) and flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) tendons. Group II comprises twenty-five patients (the control group) who underwent repair of only the FDP tendon. Results: In our investigation, 50 cases with four strand repairs of zone II flexor tendon injuries were considered. The rehabilitation and follow-up procedures were the same for both groups. According to Strickland criteria, the results were measured in terms of total range of motion and revealed significant differences between the two groups. Group with repair of both FDP and FDS has a higher range of motion. MSK US showed a higher rate of granulation tissue formation in group I but was not statistically significant. 319 Conclusion: In the management of flexor tendon injuries zone II, we recommend repairing both FDP tendon and FDS tendon to keep the integrity of full motion of the digit. Repairing both slips of FDS in addition to FDP tendon may increase the granulation tissue formation which impairs gliding but that can be avoided by routine post-operative physiotherapy and avoid bulky intra-operative repair. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Flexor Tendon; Zone II; FDP; FDS; Adhesion; Range of motion; Flexor repair | ||||
| References | ||||
|
Griffin M, Hindocha S, Jordan D, Saleh M, Khan W. "Suppl 1: An Overview of the Management of Flexor Tendon Injuries." The open orthopaedics journal, 6: 28. 2012. 2- Sadek A.F., Hweidi A.S. and Ahmed M.A.: Outcomes of staged reconstruction of Zone 2 flexor tendon injuries in recent wide-awake surgical settings and an earlier case series [published online ahead of print, 2021 Oct 26]. J. Hand Surg. Eur. Vol., 17531934211053267, 2021. 3- Uslu M., Isik C., Ozsahin M., Ozkan A.R., Yasar M., Orhan Z., Inanmaz M.E. and Sarman H.: "Flexor tendons repair: Effect of core sutures caliber with increased number of suture strands and peripheral sutures. A sheep model." Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, 100 (6): 611-616, 2014. 4- Thomopoulos S., Kim H.M., Das R., Silva M.J., Sakiyama- Elbert S., Amiel D. and Gelberman R.H.: The effects of exogenous basic fibroblast growth factor on intrasynovial flexor tendon healing in a canine model. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 92 (13): 2285, 2010. 5- McDonald E., Gordon J.A., Buckley J.M. and Gordon L.: "Comparison of a new multifilament stainless steel suture with frequently used sutures for flexor tendon repair." The Journal of hand surgery, 36 (6): 1028-1034, 2011. 6- Tang J.B., Zhang Y., Cao Y. and Xie R.G.: "Core suture purchase affects strength of tendon repairs." The Journal of hand surgery, 30 (6): 1262-1266, 2005. 7- Frueh F.S., Kunz V.S., Gravestock I.J., Held L., Haefeli M., Giovanoli P. and Calcagni M.: "Primary flexor tendon repair in zones 1 and 2: Early passive mobilization versus controlled active motion." The Journal of hand surgery, 39 (7): 1344-1350, 2014. 8- Elliot D. and Giesen T.: "Avoidance of unfavourable results following primary flexor tendon surgery." Indian journal of plastic surgery: official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India, 46 (2): 312, 2013. 9- Wada A., Kubota H., Miyanishi K., Hatanaka H., Miura H. and Iwamoto Y.: "Comparison of postoperative early active mobilization and immobilization in vivo utilising a four-strand flexor tendon repair." Journal of hand surgery, 26 (4): 301-306, 2001. 10- Saillard P.J., Amadio P.C., Zhao C., Zobitz M.E. and An K.N.: Gliding resistance after FDP and FDS tendon repair in zone II: an in vitro study. Acta. Orthop. Scand., 73 (4): 465-470, 2002. 11- Tang J.B., Xie R.G., Cao Y., Ke Z.S. and Xu Y.: A2 pulley incision or one slip of the superficialis improves flexor tendon repairs. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 456: 121-127, 2007. 12- Zhao C., Amadio P.C., Zobitz M.E. and An K-N.: Resection of the flexor digitorum superficialis reduces gliding resistance after zone II flexor digitorum profundus repair in vitro. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 27: 316-321, 2002. 13- Goggins T., Syme D. and Murali S.R.: "(iv) Acute flexor tendon injury and rehabilitation of hand injuries." Orthopaedics and Trauma, 28 (4): 219-224, 2014. 14- Strickland J.W. and Glogovac S.V.: "Digital function following flexor tendon repair in zone II: A comparison of immobilization and controlled passive motion techniques." The Journal of hand surgery, 5 (6): 537-543, 1980. 15- Strickland J.W.: "Development of flexor tendon surgery: Twenty- five years of progress." Journal of hand surgery, 25 (2): 214-235, 2000. 16- Caulfield R.H., Maleki-Tabrizi A., Patel H., Coldham F., Mee S. and Nanchahal J.: "Comparison of zones 1 to 4 flexor tendon repairs using absorbable and unabsorbable four-strand core sutures." Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 33 (4): 412- 417, 2008. 17- Sandow M. and McMahon M.: "Active mobilization following single cross grasp four-strand flexor tenorrhaphy (Adelaide repair)." Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 36 (6): 467-475, 2011. 18- Braga-Silva J. and Kuyven C.: "Early active mobilization after flexor tendon repairs in zone two." Chirurgie de la main, 24 (3): 165-168, 2005. 19- Starnes T., Saunders R.J. and Means K.R.: "Clinical outcomes of zone II flexor tendon repair depending on mechanism of injury." The Journal of hand surgery, 37 (12): 2532-2540, 2012. 20- Al-Qattan M.: "Zone 2 lacerations of both flexor tendons of all fingers in the same patient." Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 36 (3): 205-209, 2011. 21- Klein L.: "Early active motion flexor tendon protocol using one splint." Journal of Hand Therapy, 16 (3): 199206. 2003. 22- Tang J.: "Flexor tendon repair in zone 2C." The Journal of Hand Surgery: British & European Volume, 19 (1): 72-75, 1994. 23- Barrie K.A., Tomak S.L., Cholewicki J., Merrell G.A. and Wolfe S.W.: "Effect of suture locking and suture caliber on fatigue strength of flexor tendon repairs." The Journal of hand surgery, 26 (2): 340-346, 2001 | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 184 PDF Download: 188 |
||||
