Binary Oppositions in Margaret Atwood's The Edible Woman | ||||
| مجلة کلية الآداب .جامعة بورسعيد | ||||
| Article 4, Volume 26, Issue 26, October 2023, Page 1-44 PDF (477.88 K) | ||||
| Document Type: المقالة الأصلية | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/jfpsu.2023.233586.1300 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Author | ||||
ِAshraf Ibrahim Zidan 
| ||||
| Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Arts, Port Said University | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| . This paper, titled "Binary Oppositions in Margaret Atwood's The Edible Woman," comprises two integral sections: a theoretical framework and an applied study. The theoretical framework delves into the concept of binary oppositions through a structuralist lens, providing a comprehensive definition and understanding within the realm of literary analysis. In the applied study, the focus narrows to Atwood's 1969 novel, The Edible Woman. Here, the analysis scrutinizes the contrasting dichotomies woven throughout the characters, narrative, and writing style of the novel. By dissecting these opposing elements, the study uncovers profound layers of meaning and underscores the inherent tension and complexity within the text. In The Edible Woman, various pairs of characters are utilized by the author to explore contrasting dynamics and themes, particularly related to identity, gender roles, and societal expectations. Furthermore, the distinctive narrative structure plays a pivotal role in conveying the evolving psychological state of the protagonist, Marian. A striking symbol of her transformation and shifting mental state is found in the contrasting depictions of her two trips to the supermarket. The marked differences in language and style employed to describe these outings serve to accentuate Marian's profound character evolution, her passage from confusion and loss to regained identity and clarity. يتألف هذا البحث وعنوانه "المعارضات الثنائية في رواية مارجريت أتوود امرأة صالحة للأكل" من قسمين متكاملين: إطار نظري، ودراسة تطبيقية. يتعمق الإطار النظري في مفهوم المعارضات الثنائية من خلال عدسة نظرية البنيوية، الأمر الذي يوفر تعريفًا وفهمًا شاملين في مجال التحليل الأدبي. وفي الدراسة التطبيقية، يسلط البحث الضوء على رواية أتوود لعام 1969 "امرأة صالحة للأكل". وفي هذا الصدد، يدقق الباحث في تحليل الانقسامات المتناقضة المنسوجة في الشخصيات والسرد وأسلوب الكتابة في الرواية من خلال تشريح هذه العناصر المتعارضة، كما تكشف الدراسة عن طبقات عميقة من المعنى، وتؤكد التوتر والتعقيد المتأصل في النص. وقد استخدمت المؤلفة في هذه الراواية أزواجًا مختلفة من الشخصيات لاستكشاف الديناميكيات والموضوعات المتناقضة، ولا سيما المتعلقة بالهوية وأدوار الجنسين والتوقعات المجتمعية. علاوة على ذلك، تؤدي البنية السردية المميزة دورًا محوريًا في نقل الحالة النفسية المتطورة لبطلة الرواية "ماريان"؛ إذ يجد القارئ رمزًا مدهشًا لتحولها وحالتها العقلية المتغيرة في الصور المتناقضة لرحلتيها إلى السوبر ماركت، وتعمل الاختلافات الملحوظة في اللغة والأسلوب المستخدم لوصف هذه الرحلات على إبراز التطور العميق لشخصية "ماريان"، وكيفية انتقالها من الارتباك والخسارة إلى استعادة الهوية والوضوح. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Binary Opposition; Margaret Atwood; Feminism; Identity; Patriarchy; Structuralism; The Edible Woman; المعارضة الثنائية; مارجريت أتوود; النسوية; الهوية; الذكورية; البنيوية; إمرأة صالحة للأكل | ||||
| References | ||||
|
Abrams, M. H. A Dictionary of Literary Terms. Seventh ed., Heinle & Heinle, 1999. Ahmadi, Alimorad, et al. "Binary oppositions in the structure of Masnavi stories". Journal of Language Teaching and Research, vol. 4, no. 4, 2013, pp. 724-730. Banerjee, Prantik & Arpita Mukherjee. “Surviving Consumerism and Eating Disorders in Margaret Atwood’sThe Edible Woman”. Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), vol. 21, no. 8, 2016, pp. 21-25. Barry, Peter. Beginning Theory: An Introduction to Literary and Cultural Theory. Second Ed.. Manchester University Press, 2002. Bratanovic, Edita. “The Psychological State of the Mind of Female Characters in Margaret Atwood’s Novel “The Edible Woman”. International Academic Conference on Research in Social Science, 8-10 November 2019, Oxford. Bressler, Charles E. Literary Criticism: An Introduction to Theory and Practice. Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1994. Buchbinder, David. Contemporary Literary Theory and the Reading of Poetry. Macmillan, 1991 Culler, Jonathan. The Pursuit of Signs: Semiotics, Literature, Deconstruction. Routledge, 2001. Davidson, Tess. “Structuralism: A Helpful Overview.” YouTube, uploaded by DavidsonArtonline, 14 March, 2020, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDc8d8LiSwk. Grace, Sherrill. Violent Duality: A Study of Margaret Atwood. Véhicule Press, 1980. Huiqing, Jiang. “Deconstruction of Binary Oppositions in John Donne’s A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning”. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), vol. 7, no. 6, 2019, pp. 34-39. Kuczok, M. “Conceptual Metaphors for the Notion of Christian Life in John Henry Newman‟s Parochial and Plain Sermons”. Newman Studies Journal, vol. 7, no. 2, 2010, pp. 29-40. Lentricchia, Frank, and Thomas McLaughlin, editors. Critical Terms for Literary Study. University of Chicago Press, 1990. Markos, Louis. “Structualism Lecture.”YouTube, uploaded by Joao Kzehaya, 1 June, 2014, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPhsB_yZspQ. Paradis, Careta. “Binary opposition: A spatial configuration of comparison of opposite properties along a meaning dimension.” Abstract from Oppositeness/contrariety: from Spatial Perception to Spatial Cognition (or the other way round?), Verona, Italy, 2013. Patterson, J. “The Taming of Externals: A Linguistic Study of Character Transformation in Margaret Atwood’s The Edible Woman”. Studies in Canadian Literature, vol. 7, no. 2, 1982. https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/SCL/article/view/7981. Pesquera, Mª Loreto Ballesteros. The Quest for Female Identity in Margaret Atwood’s The Edible Woman. Universidad de Valladolid, 2016. Putri, A. & P. Sarwoto. “Saussurian Binary Opposition as the Narrative Structure of Williams’Summer and Smoke”. Journal of Language and Literature, vol. 16, no. 1, 2016, pp. 82-98. Ray, Supryiam. The Bedford Glossary of Critical and Literary Terms. St Martin's Press, 2008. Selden, Raman, et al. A Reader’s Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory. Fifth ed., Longman, 2005. Tyson, Lois. Critical Theory Today: A User-friendly Guide. Routledge, 2006. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 134 PDF Download: 81 |
||||
