The Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement Using Conventional versus Stereolithographic Tooth Supported Surgical Guide; (Randomize Control Trial)
Makhlouf, A., kamel, A., Daif-Allah, K. (2023). The Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement Using Conventional versus Stereolithographic Tooth Supported Surgical Guide; (Randomize Control Trial). EKB Journal Management System, 6(2), 289-296. doi: 10.21608/aadj.2023.326292
Ahmed Ali Makhlouf; Assem Mohamed kamel; Khalid Seddiek Daif-Allah. "The Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement Using Conventional versus Stereolithographic Tooth Supported Surgical Guide; (Randomize Control Trial)". EKB Journal Management System, 6, 2, 2023, 289-296. doi: 10.21608/aadj.2023.326292
Makhlouf, A., kamel, A., Daif-Allah, K. (2023). 'The Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement Using Conventional versus Stereolithographic Tooth Supported Surgical Guide; (Randomize Control Trial)', EKB Journal Management System, 6(2), pp. 289-296. doi: 10.21608/aadj.2023.326292
Makhlouf, A., kamel, A., Daif-Allah, K. The Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement Using Conventional versus Stereolithographic Tooth Supported Surgical Guide; (Randomize Control Trial). EKB Journal Management System, 2023; 6(2): 289-296. doi: 10.21608/aadj.2023.326292

The Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement Using Conventional versus Stereolithographic Tooth Supported Surgical Guide; (Randomize Control Trial)

Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal
Volume 6, Issue 2, October 2023, Page 289-296  XML PDF (2.21 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/aadj.2023.326292
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Ahmed Ali Makhlouf1; Assem Mohamed kamel2; Khalid Seddiek Daif-Allah2
1Department of Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis and Dental Radiology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Alazhar University, Assuit, Egypt
2Department of Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis and Dental Radiology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Assuit, Egypt
Abstract
Aim: This can be done by computed tomography (CT), three dimensional implant 
planning software, image guided template production techniques, and computer aided 
surgery. Subjects and Methods: 20 implant placed in selected adult patients of both 
sexes ,divided into two groups. Group I: included 10 conventional implants placed 
in patients. Group II: Included 10 guided implants placed in patients (by using 
steriolithography.). Clinical photographs were taken before ,during and after procedures 
.Conebeam computed tomography was performed. Surgical procedure was done and 
implant were positioned. Implant evaluation clinically by implant primary stability 
by measuring the accuracy of the surgical guide on the postoperative image after 
implant insertion by recorded linear deviation(coronal ,apical )angular deviation ,and 
measurement of deviation in the post-operative implant position from the preoperative 
virtual implant planning. Results: We found noticeable high significant difference in 
group I than Group II in Coronal ,apical ,angular direction. Conclusion: The results 
proved the benefit of Using surgical guide template .It enables the clinician to optimize 
implant position, angle, diameter and length by dictating the drilling position and 
angulation
Keywords
Dental implant; Cone Beam Computed Tomography; Guided Implant; Steriolithography
Statistics
Article View: 93
PDF Download: 55