Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery in gynecological operations: a randomized controlled trial | ||||
| Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology | ||||
| Volume 12, Issue 1, January 2020 PDF (679.99 K) | ||||
| DOI: 10.1186/s42077-020-00116-4 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Amr Nady Abdelrazik   ; Ahmad Sameer Sanad
| ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Background To investigate the effects of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery on length of hospital stay, pain management, and complication rate. Results The length of hospital stay was reduced in ERAS groups when compared with the control groups (3.46 days vs 2.28 days; < 0.0001; CI − 1.5767 to − 0.7833 for laparotomy groups and 2.18 vs 1.76 days; = 0.0115; CI − 0.7439 to − 0.0961 for laparoscopy groups respectively). Intraoperative fluid use was reduced in both ERAS groups compared to the two control groups (934 ± 245 ml and 832 ± 197 ml vs 1747 ± 257 ml and 1459 ± 304 respectively; < 0.0001) and postoperative fluid use was also less in the ERAS groups compared to the control groups (1606 ± 607 ml and 1210 ± 324 ml vs 2682 ± 396 ml and 1469 ± 315 ml respectively; < 0.0001). Pain score using visual analog scale (VAS) on postoperative day 0 was 4.8 ± 1.4 and 4.1 ± 1.2 ( = 0.0066) for both laparotomy control and ERAS groups respectively, while in the laparoscopy groups, VAS was 3.8 ± 1.1 and 3.2 ± 0.9 ( = 0.0024) in control and ERAS groups respectively. Conclusion Implementation of ERAS protocols in gynecologic surgery was associated with significant reduction in length of hospital stay, associated with decrease intravenous fluids used and comparable pain control without increase in complication rates. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| enhanced recovery after surgery; Length of hospital stay and gynecological operations | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 18 PDF Download: 20 |
||||
