Comparative study between volume-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled ventilation in prevention of postoperative pulmonary atelectasis in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric sleeve surgery | ||||
| Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology | ||||
| Volume 12, Issue 1, January 2020 PDF (436.91 K) | ||||
| DOI: 10.1186/s42077-020-00080-z | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Ramy Mohammed Hassan   ; Hoda Omar Mahmoud; Wael Ahmed Abd el Aal; Mona Ahmed Mohamed Abdelmotaleb; Tarek Samir Shabana
| ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Background Atelectasis can result during general anesthesia from mechanical ventilation and decrease in lung volume particularly in morbidly obese patients undergoing abdominal laparoscopic sleeve surgery, which may result in the development of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), including hypoxemia and pneumonia, with an increased risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Objective To compare between volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) in prevention of postoperative pulmonary atelectasis in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric sleeve surgery. Methods This is a randomized prospective comparative clinical study with a total of 52 morbidly obese patients who were randomly divided into 2 groups; 26 patients in group (V) for VCV and 26 in group (P) for PCV arterial blood samples were obtained, and PaCO, PaO, and SaO were obtained and recorded. ABG analyses were also obtained 30 min, 12 h, and 24 h post-extubation, and PaCO, PaO, and SaO were obtained and recorded. Results The results of this study revealed no significant differences between PCV and VCV as regards the incidence of postoperative lung atelectasis immediately postoperative (69.2% with VCV vs 61.5% with PCV, = 0.368), 12 h postoperative (61.5% with VCV vs 53.8% with PCV, = 0.282), and 24 h postoperative (53.8% with VCV vs 46.2% with PCV, = 0.325). There were also no significant differences between VCV and PCV as regards baseline, intra-, and post-operative PaCO levels as well as baseline and postoperative SaO and PaO values. However, PCV showed better intraoperative oxygenation compared to VCV. SaO was 96.32% ± 1.85 and 97.25% ± 1.37 in VCV and PCV groups respectively ( = 0.027) while PaO was 212.75 mmHg ± 20.13 and 225.8 mmHg ± 18.69 in VCV and PCV groups respectively ( = 0.011). Conclusion Despite a slight improvement in intraoperative oxygenation parameters (PO, SaO) with PCV than VCV, there is no significant difference between VCV and PCV in the prevention of postoperative pulmonary atelectasis; moreover, there is no difference in postoperative oxygenation parameters in morbidly obese patients who undergo laparoscopic sleeve surgery. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| VCV; PCV; atelectasis | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 4 PDF Download: 8 |
||||
