Ultrasound-guided penile block for circumcision instead of anatomical landmark method in newborn babies | ||||
| Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology | ||||
| Volume 13, Issue 1, January 2021 PDF (2.27 MB) | ||||
| DOI: 10.1186/s42077-021-00158-2 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Serap Aktas Yildirim   ; Hamiyet Ozcan; Ayda Turkoz
| ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Background The primary objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the newborn’s penile block performed by the surgeon using the classical landmark method and the penile block performed by the anesthesiologist with ultrasound guidance. Results This prospective, single-blinded, randomized clinical study included a total of forty newborn babies scheduled to undergo elective circumcision. The babies were randomized into two treatment groups of ultrasound (US)-guided penile block (group I; n = 20) and classical landmark method dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB) (group II; n = 20) group. Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) score was used to determine the block efficacy and postoperative pain and analgesic requirements. Intraoperative and postoperative FLACC scores, intraoperative analgesic needs, discharge time, complications, first oral intake time, and parent’s satisfaction were also recorded. Conclusions Intraoperative analgesic needs and pain scores are lower in newborn babies who performed penile block with ultrasound-guided compared to the landmark method. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Newborn circumcision; Ultrasound-guided penile block; Landmark method penile block; Intraoperative analgesic need; Parent’s satisfaction | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 15 PDF Download: 21 |
||||
