Review of the Effectiveness of Composite Barrier Mesh Used for Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair
Mishra, R., Soares, A., Al-Qattan, A. (2019). Review of the Effectiveness of Composite Barrier Mesh Used for Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair. EKB Journal Management System, 75(5), 2801-2805. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2019.32982
R. K. Mishra; Abinadabe dos Santos Pires Soares; Abdullah Jassim Al-Qattan. "Review of the Effectiveness of Composite Barrier Mesh Used for Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair". EKB Journal Management System, 75, 5, 2019, 2801-2805. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2019.32982
Mishra, R., Soares, A., Al-Qattan, A. (2019). 'Review of the Effectiveness of Composite Barrier Mesh Used for Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair', EKB Journal Management System, 75(5), pp. 2801-2805. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2019.32982
Mishra, R., Soares, A., Al-Qattan, A. Review of the Effectiveness of Composite Barrier Mesh Used for Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair. EKB Journal Management System, 2019; 75(5): 2801-2805. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2019.32982

Review of the Effectiveness of Composite Barrier Mesh Used for Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair

The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine
Article 9, Volume 75, Issue 5, April 2019, Page 2801-2805  XML PDF (232.09 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejhm.2019.32982
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
R. K. Mishra email 1; Abinadabe dos Santos Pires Soares2; Abdullah Jassim Al-Qattan3
1World Laparoscopy Hospital, Delhi, India
2Hospital Santa Joana Recife, Graças, Brazil
3King Khalid Hospital, Najran, KSA
Abstract
Background: The objective of this research is to provide an overview of the physical and biomechanical properties of composite barrier meshes frequently used in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair as well as reviewing the existing relevant literature assessing the characteristics and effectiveness of both procedures. Methods: A secondary research is used using existing literature review of the preclinical and clinical literature designed to compare the Composite prostheses with permanent barriers (COMPOSIX, VENTRIO, DUALMESH, DYNAMESH and TiMESH ) to composite prostheses with absorbable barriers ( PROCEED, C-QUR, PHYSIOMESH, PARIETEX and SEPRAMESH ). Results: Significant differences were observed between Composite prostheses with regard to its physical and biomechanical properties. Amongst the permanent barrier meshes, Dualmesh showed the highest suture retention strength. On the other hand, between the absorbable barrier meshes, Sepramesh proved to have the most significant suture retention and tears strength. Overall, all meshes established tensile strengths greater than 16-32 N/cm. Moreover, that composite meshes with absorbable barriers had less complications of adhesions, recurrences and wound infection compared with meshes with permanent barriers. Conclusion: Composite meshes with absorbable barriers proved to be superior to permanent ones. Other findings demonstrated there was no significant difference of effectiveness among absorbable barriers.
Keywords
Absorbable barrier; Laparoscopy; Ventral hernia; Mesh; Adhesions; Recurrence; Permanent barrier
Statistics
Article View: 290
PDF Download: 534