Comparing the usefulness of VividTrac and classic Macintosh laryngoscope in intubation in pediatric patients with cleft palate | ||||
| Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology | ||||
| Volume 15, Issue 1, January 2023 PDF (869.79 K) | ||||
| DOI: 10.1186/s42077-023-00335-5 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Hani I. Taman   ; Tarek Habeeb Ramadan ; Mohamed E. Elshahawy ; Ahmed M. Farid ; Mostafa S. Elawady ; Sherif I. Elfayomy ; Hosam I. El Said Saber
| ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Background Surgical repair for pediatric patients with cleft palate is performed under general anesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation. However, intubating these cases is usually difficult because of the cleft itself and associated airway abnormalities. VividTrac, a video laryngoscopy that could provide a real-time picture of the glottic area, could be helpful in these cases. Methods We conducted the current prospective investigation to compare VividTrac and conventional Macintosh laryngoscope in intubating pediatric patients with cleft palate. Results All patient demographics did not express significant differences between the two groups. The number of trials and the first trial success rate were in favor of group L. The former had mean values of 1.28 and 1.05, while the latter occurred in 81.4% and 97.7% of patients in groups L and V, respectively. Group V showed a significant increase in the time interval passing between mouth opening and connecting the tube with the ventilator. Conclusions VividTrac laryngoscope could be a valid and more suitable option for intubation in pediatric patients with cleft palate. Compared to the conventional laryngoscope, it has a higher success rate, lower attempt number, and lower need for assisting maneuvers. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| VividTrac; Macintosh laryngoscopy; Intubation; cleft palate | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 14 PDF Download: 16 |
||||
