Failure Analysis of Zirconia Versus PolyEtherEtherKetone Custom Made Posts in Endodontically Treated Anterior Teeth. (An In vitro Study) | ||||
| MSA Dental Journal | ||||
| Volume 2, Issue 4 - Serial Number 22, October 2023, Page 89-98 PDF (795.71 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/msadj.2023.251393.1026 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Mohannad Moutaz Al Bezreh  1; Aya Ahmed Salama 2; Rabab Mohammed Abdallah3
| ||||
| 1Restorative and Esthetic Dentistry Master Program, Dentistry, October University for Modern Sciences and Arts, 6 october, Egypt | ||||
| 2Department of Prosthodontics, October University for Modern Sciences and Arts, 6 October, Egypt | ||||
| 3Fixed Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Background: PolyEtherEtherKetone and zirconia are two recent esthetic post materials used in treatment of endodontically treated teeth. Although both materials share similar esthetic properties but have different mechanical properties which could affect their mode of failures. Therefore, the aim of the study was to analyze the failure modes of zirconia versus PEEK custom made posts in anterior endodontically treated teeth. Materials and Methods: Thirty-six anterior maxillary incisors with similar dimensions were collected, decoronated, endodontically treated, and post space prepared. The teeth were divided according to material of post into two groups: group (1) PolyEtherEtherKetone post and group (2) zirconia post. PolyEtherEtherKetone posts were surface treated via sulfuric acid while zirconia posts were sandblasted by 50um aluminum oxide particles. All posts were cemented using dual cure self-adhesive cement. Thermocycling at 5,000 cycles was done to all samples. The samples were loaded to failure via universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Failure modes were evaluated using a scanning electron microscope under magnifications of 52x, 250x and 400x. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between failure modes of the two post material types at the cervical, middle as well as apical root levels (P-value = 0.070), (P-value = 0.580) and (P-value = 1), respectively. Conclusions: The failure modes between both zirconia and PEEK posts were comparable, making them viable options as custom-made post materials. However within the PEEK posts adhesive and adhesive-cohesive failures were more common while in zirconia posts cohesive failure was more dominant. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Custom post; Endodontically Treated; Failure mode; PEEK; Zirconia | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 87 PDF Download: 59 |
||||
