Evaluation of chlorhexidine and povidone iodine activity against biofilm forming Staphylococcus epidermidis clinical isolates

Makled, amal Fathalla; Ghareib, Mohamed Medhat; Ali, Sahar; Sharweed, Mostafa Mahmoud; Sleem, Asmaa shaban

doi:10.21608/mid.2023.240761.1631

	Evaluation of chlorhexidine and povidone iodine activity against biofilm forming Staphylococcus epidermidis clinical isolates
Microbes and Infectious Diseases
Article 21, Volume 5, Issue 1, February 2024, Page 190-200 PDF (722.08 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/mid.2023.240761.1631
View on SCiNiTO
Authors
amal Fathalla Makled ¹; Mohamed Medhat Ghareib ²; Sahar Ali ¹; Mostafa Mahmoud Sharweed ²; Asmaa shaban Sleem ¹
¹Medical Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shebin El-kom32512, Egypt.
²Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Menoufia University, Shebin El-kom32512, Menoufia, Egypt
Abstract
Background: Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis) has emerged as a major etiological factor in implant-related infections, primarily due to its biofilm forming ability. These biofilms enhances bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents. Aim: This study aimed to detect and characterize drug-resistant S. epidermidis strains in clinical samples obtained from Menoufia University Hospitals, with evaluating their biofilm-forming ability and assessing the antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine and povidone iodine. Methodology: Drug-resistant S. epidermidis strains were identified using the Vitek2 system and their biofilm producing ability was determined. The presence of biofilm-related genes (icaA and icaD) was confirmed through polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Multi-drug resistant S. epidermidis isolates capable of biofilm formation were exposed to varying concentrations of chlorhexidine (0.025%, 0.035%, 0.05%, 0.12%) and povidone iodine (1.5%, 3.5%, 7.5%, 10%) for different exposure times. Results: Of 354 clinical isolates, 75 (21.2%) were identified as drug-resistant S. epidermidis using Vitek2 system. Biofilm production was observed and confirmed by the presence of icaA / icaD genes among 61-isolates. Chlorhexidine demonstrated significant effectiveness in vitro at concentration of 0.05% with a short exposure time of 1 minute. In contrast, povidone iodine required higher concentrations and prolonged exposure times to exhibit antibacterial activity. Conclusion: Chlorhexidine was an effective antimicrobial agent against S. epidermidis, particularly when used at clinically available concentrations (0.05%) with short exposure time, whereas povidone-iodine required higher concentrations with prolonged exposure times. Further investigations are warranted to optimize the use of these antiseptics.
Keywords
S. epidermidis; biofilm; resistance; chlorhexidine; povidone iodine


Statistics Article View: 276 PDF Download: 105