The role of the Ex-PRESS device implantation in the management of pseudophakic glaucoma
Abdelhameed, H., Kamel, A., Ismail, A., Mohammed, U. (2018). The role of the Ex-PRESS device implantation in the management of pseudophakic glaucoma. EKB Journal Management System, 22(3), 209-217. doi: 10.21608/smj.2018.33465
Hany Mahmoud Abdelhameed; Ahmed Gad Kamel; Ali Mahmoud Ismail; Usama Ali Mohammed. "The role of the Ex-PRESS device implantation in the management of pseudophakic glaucoma". EKB Journal Management System, 22, 3, 2018, 209-217. doi: 10.21608/smj.2018.33465
Abdelhameed, H., Kamel, A., Ismail, A., Mohammed, U. (2018). 'The role of the Ex-PRESS device implantation in the management of pseudophakic glaucoma', EKB Journal Management System, 22(3), pp. 209-217. doi: 10.21608/smj.2018.33465
Abdelhameed, H., Kamel, A., Ismail, A., Mohammed, U. The role of the Ex-PRESS device implantation in the management of pseudophakic glaucoma. EKB Journal Management System, 2018; 22(3): 209-217. doi: 10.21608/smj.2018.33465

The role of the Ex-PRESS device implantation in the management of pseudophakic glaucoma

Sohag Medical Journal
Article 24, Volume 22, Issue 3, October 2018, Page 209-217  XML PDF (115.33 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/smj.2018.33465
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Hany Mahmoud Abdelhameed1; Ahmed Gad Kamel2; Ali Mahmoud Ismail1; Usama Ali Mohammed3
1Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University.
2Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University
3Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University.
Abstract
Purpose: evaluation of the role of the Ex-PRESS device implantation in the management of pseudophakic glaucoma.
Design: non-comparative case series study.
Patients and methods: 6 eyes with pseudophakic glaucoma scheduled to undergo Ex-PRESS glaucoma filtration device. Each study patient underwent a complete ophthalmic examination preoperatively including full clinical history taking, VA measurement, autorefraction examination, slit lamp biomicroscopy of the anterior segment, IOP measurement using Goldmann applanation tonometer, gonioscopic examination to evaluate of the angle of AC, and ophthalmoscopy of the posterior segment using a direct ophthalmoscopy. All the patients were subjected to functional and structural evaluation by SAP (HFA 745i) for central 30-2 threshold test, endothelial cell evaluation by non-contact specular microscopy (Topcon specular microscope; SP-1P Version 1.20) for endothelial cell count and OCT scans (Topcon 3D OCT-2000) for peripapillary RNFL thickness measurements, ONH analysis and GCA. All patients included were having pseudophakic OAG. Patients were excluded if they were under 18 years old. All eyes underwent Ex-PRESS device implantation performed by the same surgeon for consistency, using the standardized technique for the procedure. A complete ophthalmologic follow-up examination included IOP measurement using Goldmann applanation tonometry, number of drugs required to attain IOP control and any associated complications was carried out postoperatively at the 1st and 3rd days, the end of 1st week, every month till the end of the 6th month and the end of 1st year. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was tested using Snellen chart, which was converted to LogMAR for statistical analysis. Criteria for success were defined as follows; Absolute success: IOP ≤21 mmHg without any medication, qualified success: IOP ≤21 mmHg with ocular hypotensive medications. VF test with SAP, specular microscopy and ONH analysis and GCA assessed with OCT were carried out one year postoperatively.
Results: There were 4 eyes (80%) showed complete success (IOP P<0.001) with the most reduction in IOP observed at 6 months after surgery due to controlling all cases with IOP >21 mmHg using anti-glaucoma medications by this time. There is a statistically significant improvement of postoperative BCVA (P=0.002). Moreover, there is a statistically significant reduction of number of anti-glaucoma medications used postoperatively (P<0.001). For VF indices, there is a statistically significant improvement in both MD and PSD postoperatively (MD; P<0.001) (PSD; P=0.002). However; There is no significant improvement in the staging of glaucoma according to GSS2 (P=327). For OCT parameter, there is a statistically significant increase in the thickness of both RNFL and GCC (P<0.001). Furthermore, endothelial CD shows a statistically significant increase postoperatively (P <0.001).
Conclusion: Ex-PRESS is preferable for pseudphakic glaucoma.

Supplementary Files
References
  1. van Oye R and Gelisken O. Pseudophakic glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol. 1985;8(3):183-6.
  2. Jamil AZ, Iqbal K, Ur Rahman F, et al. Effect of phacoemulsification on intraocular pressure. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2011;21(6):347-50.
  3. Bhallil S, Andalloussi IB, Chraibi F, et al. Changes in intraocular pressure after clear corneal phacoemulsification in normal patients. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2009;2(3):111-3.
  4. Călugăru M. Tratat clinic de glaucoma. 1998, Editura Da­cia, Cluj-Napoca.
  5. Minckler DS, Francis BA, Hodapp EA, et al. Aqueous shunts in glaucoma: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmol. 2008;115(6):1089-98.
  6. Francis BA, Singh K, Lin SC, et al. Novel glaucoma procedures: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmol. 2011;118(7):1466-80.
  7. Quigley HA and Broman AT. The number of people of glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(3):262-7.
  8. Takihara Y, InataniM, Ogata-Iwao M, et al. Trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma in phakic eyes vs in pseudophakic eyes after phacoemulsification: A prospective clinical cohort study. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132(1):69-76.
  9. The Fluorouracil Filtering Surgery Study Group. Five year follow up of the fluorouracil filtering surgery study. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;121(4):349-66.
  10. Prata Júnior JA, Minckler DS, Baerveldt G, et al.  Trabeculectomy in pseudophakic patients: postoperative 5-fluorouracil versus intraoperative mitomycin C antiproliferative therapy.  Ophthalmic Surg. 1995;26(1):73-7.
  11. Takihara  Y, Inatani  M, Seto  T,  et al.  Trabeculectomy with mitomycin for open-angle glaucoma in phakic vs pseudophakic eyes after phacoemulsification.  Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129(2):152-7.
  12. Broadway DC, Grierson I and Hitchings RA.  Local effects of previous conjunctival incisional surgery and the subsequent outcome of filtration surgery.  Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125(6):805-18.
  13. Joseph JP, Grierson I and Hitchings RA.  Chemotactic activity of aqueous humor: a cause of failure of trabeculectomies?  Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107(1):69-74.
  14. Inoue T, Kawaji T, Inatani M, et al.  Simultaneous increases in multiple proinflammatory cytokines in the aqueous humor in pseudophakic glaucomatous eyes.  J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(8):1389-97.
  15. Liu JH,  Lin HY,  Tzeng SH, et al. Comparison of trabeculectomy with Ex-PRESS shunt implantation in primary-open-angle-glaucoma patients: A retrospective study. Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2015;5(3):120-3.
  16. Bustros YD, Fechtner R and Khouri AS. Outcomes of Ex-PRESS and trabeculectomy in a glaucoma population of African origin: one year results. J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2017;11(2):42-7.  
  17. Good TJ and Kahook MY. Assessment of bleb morphologic features and postoperative outcomes after Ex-PRESS drainage device implantation versus trabeculectomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151:507-13.e1.
  18. Costa VP, Smith M, Spaeth GL, et al. Loss of visual acuity after trabeculectomy. Ophthalmol. 1993;100:599-612.
  19. Levene RZ. Central visual field, visual acuity, and sudden visual loss after glaucoma surgery. Ophthalmic Surg. 1992;23:388-94.
  20. Wagschal LD, Trope GE, Jinapriya D, et al. Prospective randomized study comparing Ex-PRESS to trabeculectomy: 1-year results. J Glaucoma. 2015;24(8):624-9.
  21. Beltran-Agullo L, Trope GE, Jin Y, et al. Comparison of visual recovery following Ex-PRESS versus trabeculec‌tomy: results of a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Glaucoma. 2015;24:181-6.
  22. Boissonot M, Hirsch AL, Rovira JC, et al. Evolution du champ visuel enperimetrie automatisee dans le glaucoma chronique equilibrepar trabeculectomie. J Fr Ophtalmol. 1992;15:645-50.
  23. Gandolfi S. Improvement of visual field indices after surgical reduction of intraocular pressure. Ophthalmic Surg. 1995;26:121-6.
  24. Vuori ML, Vainio-Jylhä E and Viitanen TT. Localised changes in glaucomatous visual fields after trabeculectomy. Acta Ophthalmol. Scand. 2001;79:468-71.
  25. Flammer J and Drance SM. Effect if acetazolamide on the differential threshold. Arch Ophthalmol. 1983;101:1378-80.
  26. Wright TM, Goharian I, Gardiner SK, et al. Short-term enhancement of visual field sensitivity in glaucomatous eye following surgical intraocular pressure reduction. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159:378-85. 
  27. Wild JM, Searle AE, Dengler-Harles M, et al. Long-term follow-up of baseline learning and fatigue effects in the automated perimeter of glaucoma and ocular hypertensive patients. Acta Ophthalmol. 1991;69:210-6.
  28. Heijl A and Bengtsson B. The effect of perimetric experience in patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114:19-22.
  29. Sarkar KC,  Das P,  Pal R, et al. Optical coherence tomographic assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness changes before and after glaucoma filtration surgery. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2014;7(1):3-8.
  30. Quigley HA. The pathogenesis of reversible cupping in congenital glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1977;84:358-70.
  31. Albon J, Purslow PP, Karwatowski WS, et al. Age related compliance of the lamina cribrosa in human eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:318-23.
  32. Yildirim E, Bilge AH and Ilker S. Improvement of visual field following trabeculectomy for open angle glaucoma. Eye. 1990;4:103-6.
  33. Tsai CS, Shin DH, Wan JY, et al. Visual field global indices in patients with reversal of glaucomatous cupping after intraocular pressure reduction. Ophthalmol. 1991;98:1412-9.
  34. Lesk MR, Spaeth GL, Azuara-Blanco A, et al. Reversal of optic disc cupping after glaucoma surgery analyzed with a scanning laser tomograph. Ophthalmol. 1999;106:1013-8.
  35. Aydin A, Wollstein G, Price LL, et al. Optical coherence tomography assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness changes after glaucoma surgery. Ophthalmol. 2003;110:1506-11.
  36. Chang PT, Sekhon N, Budenz DL, et al. Effect of lowering intraocular pressure on optical coherence tomography measurement of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Ophthalmol. 2007;114:2252-8.
  37. Lim KS. Corneal endothelial cell damage from glaucoma drainage device materials. Cornea. 2003;22(4):352-4.
  38. Konopinska J, Deniziak M, Saeed E, et al. Prospective randomized study comparing combined phaco-ExPress and phacotrabeculectomy in open angle glaucoma treatment: 12-month follow-up. J Ophthalmol.  2015;2015:720109.
  39. Saheb H, Gedde SJ, Schiffman JC, et al. Outcomes of glaucoma reoperations in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157(6):1179-89.e2.
  40. Park JH, Lee SM, Kwon JW, et al. Ultrasound energy in phacoemulsification: a comparative analysis of phaco-chop and stop-and-chop techniques according to the degree of nuclear density. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2010;41(2):236-41.
  41. Moschos MM, Chatziralli IP and Sergentanis TN. Viscoat versus Visthesia during phacoemulsification cataract surgery: corneal and foveal changes. BMC Ophthalmol. 2011;11(1):9.
  42. Ollivier FJ, Brooks DE, Komaromy AM, et al. Corneal thickness and endothelial cell density measured by non-contact specular microscopy and pachymetry in Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) with laser-induced ocular hypertension. Exp Eye Res. 2003;76(6):671-7.
  43. Fiore PM, Richter G, Arzeno CU, et al. The effect of anterior chamber depth on endothelial cell count after filtration surgery,” Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107(11):1609-11.
  44. Lass JH, Khosrof SA, Laurence JK, et al. A double-masked, randomized, 1-year study comparing the corneal effects of dorzolamide, timolol, and betaxolol. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116(8):1003-10.
 

 


 

 

Statistics
Article View: 194
PDF Download: 265