Laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through vs. posterior sagittal anorectoplasty for treating high anorectal malformations: a single-center experience
AlShawa, M., Al Wusaibie, A., Al Shanafey, S. (2022). Laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through vs. posterior sagittal anorectoplasty for treating high anorectal malformations: a single-center experience. EKB Journal Management System, 18(1), -. doi: 10.1186/s43159-022-00162-7
Mohammad Anas AlShawa; Ahmed Al Wusaibie; Saud Al Shanafey. "Laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through vs. posterior sagittal anorectoplasty for treating high anorectal malformations: a single-center experience". EKB Journal Management System, 18, 1, 2022, -. doi: 10.1186/s43159-022-00162-7
AlShawa, M., Al Wusaibie, A., Al Shanafey, S. (2022). 'Laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through vs. posterior sagittal anorectoplasty for treating high anorectal malformations: a single-center experience', EKB Journal Management System, 18(1), pp. -. doi: 10.1186/s43159-022-00162-7
AlShawa, M., Al Wusaibie, A., Al Shanafey, S. Laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through vs. posterior sagittal anorectoplasty for treating high anorectal malformations: a single-center experience. EKB Journal Management System, 2022; 18(1): -. doi: 10.1186/s43159-022-00162-7

Laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through vs. posterior sagittal anorectoplasty for treating high anorectal malformations: a single-center experience

Annals of Pediatric Surgery
Volume 18, Issue 1, January 2022  XML PDF (755.15 K)
DOI: 10.1186/s43159-022-00162-7
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Mohammad Anas AlShawaorcid ; Ahmed Al Wusaibie; Saud Al Shanafey email
Abstract
Background/purpose
Surgical management of high-type anorectal malformations (ARM) has evolved over the years with the widespread of the laparoscopic approach over the last two decades. This study aims to compare the outcome of patients with high anorectal malformation (ARM) managed with laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through (LAARP) vs. the open posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) at a single Institution.
Methods
A retrospective chart review of pediatric patients, who were managed for high-type ARM at our institution, was performed for the period 2000–2015. Nine were excluded because of a lack of important data. Demographic data, surgical approach, associated anomalies, and complications were collected. Functional outcome was measured using the modified clinical scoring for the defecation function of the Japanese study group of anorectal anomalies. Comparison between groups was done using the test for continuous variables and the Fisher-exact test for proportions.  < 0.05 is considered statistically significant.
Results
There were 82 patients with high type imperforate anus (59 males and 23 females) 73% had laparoscopy vs. 27% open. Type of fistulae were rectourethral (36), rectovesical (12), no fistula (19), and (15) cloaca anomalies. Patients underwent surgery at a mean age 8.4 (laparoscopy) vs. 10.1 (open) months ( value = 0.14). There was no difference between the two groups regarding weight at the surgery or associated anomalies, except for VACTRAL and genitourinary malformations which were more among the laparoscopic group (8 vs. 1).
Conclusions
The defecation function and complication rate for both laparoscopic and open groups were almost similar. This may justify the preference of the laparoscopic approach over the open one, given its minimally invasive nature.
Keywords
Anorectal malformations; High type; Laparoscopic; Sagittal
Statistics
Article View: 11
PDF Download: 8